SnowGoose69 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 NYC got a bit lucky on 2/2013, the Euro busted on that event to an extent, the GFS busted worst, but we sort of got a late interaction from the incoming vort from the Lakes that exploded the snows behind the main low/vort, if that interaction was 3 hours later we were screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 A list of Newark, NJ largest storm snowfalls 1: 27.8” (1/7-8 1996)2: 26.7” (12/26-28 1947)3: 24.2” (12/26-27 2010)4: 23.1” (2/16-18 2003)5: 22.6” (2/3-4 1961)6: 21.3” (2/11-12 2006)7: 20.4” (12/11-12 1960)8: 20.2” (2/9-11 1994)9: 19.4” (1/25-27 2011)10: 19.0” (2/6-7 1978) Newark NJ NYC top storm snowfalls 1: 26.9" (2/11-12 2006)2: 26.4" (12/26-28 1947)3: 21.0" (3/12 – 3/14 1888)4: 20.9" (2/25 – 2/26 2010)5: 20.2" (1/7 – 1/8 1996)6: 20.0" (12/26 – 12/27 2010)7: 19.8" (2/16 – 2/17 2003)8: 19.0" (1/26 – 1/27 2011)9: 18.1" (3/7 – 3/8 1941)10: 17.7" (2/5 – 2/7 1978)11: 17.6" (2/11 – 2/12 1983)12: 17.5" (1/22 – 1/24 1935)13: 17.5" (2/4 – 2/7 1920)12: 17.4" (2/3 – 2/4 1961) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 The RGEM being different would worry me more than the GFS...I think its possible the RGEM is getting so overwhelmed with the dynamics to the NNE of the low over SNE its causing it to have an oversubsident area on the W side of the low by NYC. It may be getting so WAA infatuated its overlooking frontogenetic/deformation features W or WSW of the low. RGEM also shows a distinct eastward shift in the track of the primary cyclone... not sure if the lack of precip on the RGEM is completely due to over excited frontogenesis/frontolysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Long Beach's point and click has a total snow accum of between 24 and 37 inches. That's a first and probably last. Upton is going absolutely bonkers with this-they must be really confident. This is pretty much uncharted waters for them-the most I remember them ever predicting was up to 24" when Boxing Day 2010 was raging outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 A couple of points: There has never been a snowstorm in the OKX CWA where 24" was a minimum total. The ECMWF has tended to be too intense and too far west with some of its winter cyclones this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Energy is really well organized now moving through Tennessee Valley it has that look of something historic. Really cool cyclonic spin as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 18z GEFS? On mobile right now Pretty much agree with the op Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 A couple of points: There has never been a snowstorm in the OKX CWA where 24" was a minimum total. The ECMWF has tended to be too intense and too far west with some of its winter cyclones this season. An example? Cause the euro nailed this seasons thanksgiving snowstorm in terms of being west from the GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 A couple of points: There has never been a snowstorm in the OKX CWA where 24" was a minimum total. The ECMWF has tended to be too intense and too far west with some of its winter cyclones this season. The Euro has been very consistent over the last 3 runs, it's less than 48 hours out and in the Euro's wheelhouse, and other models have been flopping around. The GFS has also consistently been too far east and weak with storms for a long time. Bottom line is that the Euro could be too extreme, but I'd be stunned to see it cave to where the GFS is now. I could see a compromise of some sort though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 The Euro has been very consistent over the last 3 runs, it's less than 48 hours out and in the Euro's wheelhouse, and other models have been flopping around. The GFS has also consistently been too far east and weak with storms for a long time. Bottom line is that the Euro could be too extreme, but I'd be stunned to see it cave to where the GFS is now. I could see a compromise of some sort though. Even a compromise would be 18-24 inches... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 A couple of points: There has never been a snowstorm in the OKX CWA where 24" was a minimum total. The ECMWF has tended to be too intense and too far west with some of its winter cyclones this season. Inside of 60 hours? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 The reality is that even 1.5" of liquid would be 20" of Snow for NYC and that would be cutting the precip forecast on the Euro by about 30%... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleetStormNJ Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Euro kind of has some support from the NAM. I mean even if you think Euro is too excessive in QPF, the models are all agreeing on one thing and that is really solid snow growth/ratios in some areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Even if models like Rgem and Gfs are correct we still end up with about a foot of snow. How can anyone be upset with that given how this winter has gone to date. If a bust is 10-12" then I'll take that any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Even a compromise would be 18-24 inches... I'd have gone with that and said up to 30" where heavier banding sets up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Even if models like Rgem and Gfs are correct we still end up with about a foot of snow. How can anyone be upset with that given how this winter has gone to date. If a bust is 10-12" then I'll take that any day. Yes but that would be roughly 25-50% of what the NWS is currently forecasting for NYC. That would be a significant bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I'd have gone with that and said up to 30" where heavier banding sets up. Yes that would be a perfect call at this time... However NWS is not the only ones calling for such high totals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Upton shows the storm lasting from 11am tomorrow through wed 4am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 My gut is with the euro but I would like to see the nam and gfs show the same solution at 00z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdurango Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Boston, New York and Philly all have similar maps/thoughts at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 18z guidance range from lowest to highest is 14 - 25 inches for NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wthrmn654 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Question, blizzard warning 1 p.m. to midnight Tuesday... Doors that technically mean Wednesday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Boston, New York and Philly all have similar maps/thoughts at the moment. They all called each other and collaborated. Mt Holly also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 A question that hasn't been asked yet, and maybe a met could answer, with the air mass in place, how much if any of the precip could fall as virga tomorrow afternoon, especially with light sounding The clipper itself was never suppose to produce much. 1-3. The real deal is after the evening commute, we will loose nothing of that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The clipper itself was never suppose to produce much. 1-3. The real deal is after the evening commute, we will loose nothing of that I know the clipper is what I was referring to sorry I should have been more specific, I wondering about out of the 1-3 what falls as virga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdp146 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Boston, New York and Philly all have similar maps/thoughts at the moment. They collaborated to come up wih a unified forecast. That's a lot of meteorlogical talent making a strong statement with the public spotlight on them. Doesn't make it right, but it is a heck of a forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 There won't be a long virga period, the only notably dry layer is 925 to the surface, and its not necessarily bone dry either, I think it may reach the ground rather quickly tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 There won't be a long virga period, the only notably dry layer is 925 to the surface, and its not necessarily bone dry either, I think it may reach the ground rather quickly tomorrow. Yea, and there are already returns showing up over eastern PA. Comin' in hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 There could be someone who sees 4-5 inches during the day tomorrow if the area of snow holds together or some localized heavier bands form, the ratios may be better tomorrow than during the storm due to winds being lighter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Looks like precip is already hitting the surface pretty far east too. York, PA reporting light rain at this hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.