Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Storm Disco for Manitoba Mauler 01/26/27


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Basing my forecast ideas more on a blend than specifically on Euro. With almost all guidance showing explosive development south of Long Island, would expect a surge of very strong winds during the mid to late day on Tuesday, my original comment about 70 mph was meant to refer to peak gusts which still seems reasonable at least in areas exposed to the east or northeast, sustained winds of 45-55 mph possible in coastal and elevated locations, somewhere like ORH or PVD likely to peak at about 35 mph gusting to 55. Hope that gives a clearer picture of what I'm forecasting on wind speeds, not expecting region-wide 70 mph sustained winds (Lord help you if that happens).

 

As for snowfall amounts, local bullseye amounts of 30-35 inches possible between BOS and ORH, and in w CT, otherwise patchwork quilt of 15-25 inch amounts except only 4-8 on Cape Cod which I think will be overshot by the rapidly spinning up precip shield.

 

Central Long Island to see perhaps 20-25 inch local max, NYC about 15-20, some higher amounts in n NJ ... I am not totally buying into a huge back-thump into n NJ and prefer a storm max in MA rather than NJ despite analogues (have to say that to some extent Mar 11-12 1888 is in the analogue set too).

 

Not much risk of mixing issues except outer Cape Cod perhaps. No doubt it will form strong bands and variance from location to location might be on the order of 25% or even 40%.

 

Over/under on DT insults is 37. Justified 23.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basing my forecast ideas more on a blend than specifically on Euro. With almost all guidance showing explosive development south of Long Island, would expect a surge of very strong winds during the mid to late day on Tuesday, my original comment about 70 mph was meant to refer to peak gusts which still seems reasonable at least in areas exposed to the east or northeast, sustained winds of 45-55 mph possible in coastal and elevated locations, somewhere like ORH or PVD likely to peak at about 35 mph gusting to 55. Hope that gives a clearer picture of what I'm forecasting on wind speeds, not expecting region-wide 70 mph sustained winds (Lord help you if that happens).

As for snowfall amounts, local bullseye amounts of 30-35 inches possible between BOS and ORH, and in w CT, otherwise patchwork quilt of 15-25 inch amounts except only 4-8 on Cape Cod which I think will be overshot by the rapidly spinning up precip shield.

Central Long Island to see perhaps 20-25 inch local max, NYC about 15-20, some higher amounts in n NJ ... I am not totally buying into a huge back-thump into n NJ and prefer a storm max in MA rather than NJ despite analogues (have to say that to some extent Mar 11-12 1888 is in the analogue set too).

Not much risk of mixing issues except outer Cape Cod perhaps. No doubt it will form strong bands and variance from location to location might be on the order of 25% or even 40%.

Over/under on DT insults is 37. Justified 23.

what are your early thoughts for southern nh?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick notes of caution...  This system has evolved in the models to be a very large, and powerfully dynamic system.  So much so that it will have "it's own" internal idiosyncrasies that will inevitably emerge, and be poorly modeled when they do.  Such nuances can and do have an impact on sensible as well as more meaningful strike events...  

 

Having said that, the Euro actually is processing details that may not even exist ... or, perhaps they will; but the point being, with immense systems of certain power comes along equally daunting complexities, and the Euro's creating a wave out over the Gulf Stream may have a couple considerations....

 

 attachicon.gifecm1.jpg

 

One, it may rob some moisture from wrapping W into the CCB band.  It may also cut off some of the WCB ingest into the core deep layer mechanics.  The 2ndary result of that (if in deed it is an error) is that the system may actually not be currently modeled deep or prolific enough in that particular guidance source... 

 

That said, there is soooo much incredible dynamics with this thing, satellite vortices (to borrow an expression from our Plains brethren) almost seem necessary.  I could almost even envision a wave forming over the Bahamas after the cold front clears Florida.

 

CMC has that feature too:

 

 

With both Euro and CMC, multiple pieces of vorticity swinging around the trough, one piece gets out farther east:

 

 

Third note of caution, probably less likely, is a fujiwara effect swinging our main bombing low south and east?

 

I also wonder, in the positive column, if that stray energy farther east is preventing this from occluding sooner and further southwest, and ultimately yielding a better result for SNE?

 

Still doesn't take away from fact that there's incredible consensus in the 12z suite for explosive cyclogenesis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strong cluster on the individuals(Probably 30/50 within 25-50 miles of each other) just west of the mean and similar to or perhaps a hair west of the op. Then another cluster slightly NE of the mean and a couple members that are total misses(Probably miss the phase if I had to guess).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

I don't think we want another bump west, as it is you're sort of in a min between the two areas of max in NYC metro and BOS metro. I wouldn't mind even ticking it east a smidge.

I'm not worried about anyone being in any "min". Those things never end up working out like models show them..It's a big hit for everyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see if that is legit. IT shows up on the vorticity field too..kind of blows up NE of HSE between 60-66 versus the "real" vorticity further east swinging around the east side of the shortwave much further E.

Very obvious on the vorticity fields but I don't think it can be discarded as an artifact as it could conceivably develop that way.

IMO convective feedback is an overplayed relic from modeling days gone by

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...