Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,888
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sphinx9i
    Newest Member
    Sphinx9i
    Joined

1/25-1/26 Snow Threat


DDweatherman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/24/2015 at 6:22 PM, Bob Chill said:

It would only take a small adjustment with neg tilt and precip shield goes west quickly. 

What do you think bob? Every run the thing has been digging more, and the Euro might be taking the head in this one. Do you think its got more room to work with? I'd say about 75 more miles, which is barely needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:24 PM, UVVmet84 said:

What do you think bob? Every run the thing has been digging more, and the Euro might be taking the head in this one. Do you think its got more room to work with? I'd say about 75 more miles, which is barely needed.

 

Comparing h5 @ 60 vs 72 from last night and it's a big improvement. One more shift like that and the huge hit moves west. One shift the other way and we are all on the outside looking in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:23 PM, HighStakes said:

We could be in for a nail biter. I'm nervous.

Even without the bombing coastal, we see a few inches on the front end. I'm keeping expectations low. Two days of snow falling won't be horrible to see at least, whether it piles up or not... We shall see. I'm ready to sacrifice some goats though for decent snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:23 PM, UVVmet84 said:

Its becoming less wrap around and more coastal associated (as in straight up CCB/deform). Yes it backs into us but that is due to the pseudo block stalling it and retrograding it a bit. Plus its absolutely plummeting in pressure down to sub 980.

In these situations, are the changes we see now on the latest EURO run possibly not completely done with? In other words, do the models pick up on a trend but not necessarily show the final outcome?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:29 PM, Wonderdog said:

In these situations, are the changes we see now on the latest EURO run possibly not completely done with? In other words, do the models pick up on a trend but not necessarily show the final outcome?

Usually that can happen. However, it can also correct to an over-extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:30 PM, Bob Chill said:

The uneasy feeling I have is if we took the last 30 relatively similar setups over the last however many years, heartbreak is a heavy favorite. The MA is rarely a complicated snow region. 

That is what worries me, what was the storm I'm thinking of...December 30, 2000?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2015 at 6:30 PM, zwyts said:

Obviously parsing the minutia of a new solution is silly, but I have access to other subscription maps and are wetter and further west than WB....I wonder if WB even with the higher res has an off output this run

I'm not sure. Accuweather Pro text matches WxBell almost exactly for my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...