Gilbertfly Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 18Z RGEM pulling south and west of it's 12Z run with the QPF shield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 LOT going with 2-4" along/north of a SQI-IKK line sounds right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 LOT going with 2-4" along/north of a SQI-IKK line 2.3 in my hourly....and this via LOT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 looks old EDIT: i see the time stamp but still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 looks old EDIT: i see the time stamp but still yeah...double checked the timestamp after posting for the same thoughts.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Yeah I don't agree with that map and certain amounts where Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 2.3 in my hourly....and this via LOT TotalSnow2_small.png Expand it out a bit, and IWX looks like they're going relatively bullish for their CWA. Nasty cut-off for LAF and OKK (and that area in between to the north) though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Expand it out a bit, and IWX looks like they're going relatively bullish for their CWA. Nasty cut-off for LAF and OKK (and that area in between to the north) though. TotalSnow2_Fcst.png Obviously drawn according to the boundaries of their cwa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 18Z RGEM pulling south and west of it's 12Z run with the QPF shield it actually bumped north in MI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Obviously drawn according to the boundaries of their cwa. I know. Just funny looking around here, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCNYILWX Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Obviously drawn according to the boundaries of their cwa. That's the problem with the maps based off NDFD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 18z RGEM with snow still falling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Gfs was lame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Gfs was lameTossEdit first and final call: 2.78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 it actually bumped north in MI I think it may have more to do with the effects for MI getting into the time range of the 18Z RGEM....with the 12Z not much had reached MI yet but in the Dakotas and iowa the shield ended up being a bit further south and west...axis orientation seem to flatten a bit as opposed to the direct NW/SE axis it showed at 12Z .... all fwiw....although rgem seems to be doing well (relatively speaking) with NW flow events over the last few month or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Global_Warmer Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Absolutely pathetic modeling. Talk about screwing Detroit and huge parts of Michigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Absolutely pathetic modeling. Talk about screwing Detroit and huge parts of Michigan. We have gotten most of the clippers so far this month so missing the clipper is not the issue...the modeling is the issue...but we need to keep talk about how terrible the models are in the banter thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 2.0" looks good for ORD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 2.0" looks good for ORD. It's always good to see Jerry Taft check in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 It's always good to see Jerry Taft check in Haha your calls are less than an inch apart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 I will roll with 3.3 for my front yard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 well, dang..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitown Storm Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Lol...Jerry Taft. I don't miss that anti-weenie one bit. Revising my 'first and only' call to 2.5". I can't see this thing missing the TC that badly. I just jinxed it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Haha your calls are less than an inch apart My calls are based on watching every snow potential that's come through Chicago since 1970. In other words;gut,trend,history. Chi storms based on real meteo. So his call counts-mine not so much. Though I reserve the right if that low can pass southwest of us and entrain some lake moisture 4" on the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Tough call for here/QC. Gonna go with a broad 1-3" call for now. Depending on the model we may have some rain/dry slot issues to contend with. Gut feeling is we end up closer to 1", but if the meat of the band moves through here as a few models indicate we could get the 2-3". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitown Storm Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Pretty close to the old hood! Sneak attack. well, dang..... day2_psnow_gt_08.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 I'll go with 2.6" for now, which seems like a call I've made like six times this winter already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Pretty close to the old hood! Sneak attack. Lol....reelin' her in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indystorm Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 South Chitown burbs along U.S. 30 corridor in IN to Ft. Wayne looks golden at this point if moisture increases. IND talking at present a mix to possibly one inch just north of the metro Sunday night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Lol...Jerry Taft. I don't miss that anti-weenie one bit. Revising my 'first and only' call to 2.5". I can't see this thing missing the TC that badly. I just jinxed it... Chitown.....see my latest over at the Minnesota Forecaster site, I am known as randyinchamplin, for others here, if you read that you could extrapolate what could happen further east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.