ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 GFS has a nice dynamic CCB with heavy snow...but still doesn't quite phase all the energy smoothly. It's part of the reason the taint gets about to the pike before things crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Got precip up here to, Good run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toller65 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 SW Maine all snow on the Goofus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 That swath around Bob's house looks like a great spot onthis run. Goes to town for a while. 974 near the benchmark edit 978 need glasses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 SW Maine all snow on the Goofus? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Benchmark low with taint to the pike is not easy to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Rain to snow. Pretty decent looking storm on the GFS. Let's see what Dr. No does! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 That swath around Bob's house looks like a great spot onthis run. Goes to town for a while. 974 near the benchmark Looks sloppy but I should get some light snows on the initial WAA burst before 850s torch and than it's a waiting game on how fast the SLP can go to town and crash heights. An hour or 2 will make a big difference in totals for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I have a difficult time believing that track and profile would get sleet to the pike. That looks like an sll out snow thump within 30 miles of shore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Benchmark low with taint to the pike is not easy to do. Yeah - if there's a way to do it it's when you have absolutely zero high pressure to the north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 It's not going to start as rain inland. No way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Yeah - if there's a way to do it it's when you have absolutely zero high pressure to the north. Funny no one has mentioned that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 It's not going to start as rain inland. No way Thanks for the analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 It's not going to start as rain inland. No way Does the "new and improved" GFS show any type of warm bias? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Does the "new and improved" GFS show any type of warm bias? We havent really had a good system to test it out on yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Does the "new and improved" GFS show any type of warm bias?Considering the srefs have better verification scores the answer is yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I'm pretty sure I read a few weeks ago it does have a warm bias in the lower levels . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Does the "new and improved" GFS show any type of warm bias? Don't know about that one, I am hoping it is getting a clue on coastal cyclogenesis.................lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 It looks like it also has its fathers SE bias on esst coast lows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I'm pretty sure I read a few weeks ago it does have a warm bias in the lower levels . Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it. It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that. This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quizplz Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 SW Maine all snow on the Goofus? I don't think that was ever an issue for SW Maine for this storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quizplz Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 The GFS is coming around a bit. Looks like heavy snow to about GYX and south. Lewiston/Auburn on north sees very little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it. It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that. This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas. Like you said, it doesn't quite bomb it and develop a nice coherent CCB. Looks like best blob of precip is near the Cape with the real good height falls and low level frontogenesis. NAM is doing the same, it can't quite close off H5 in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it. It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that. This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas. this would be fun, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Like you said, it doesn't quite bomb it and develop a nice coherent CCB. Looks like best blob of precip is near the Cape with the real good height falls and low level frontogenesis. NAM is doing the same, it can't quite close off H5 in time. Anyone think the precip shield will wind up being even more compact than modeled? It seems to me the models tend to "overdo" the precip shileds when you have one of these compact nukes feeding off DCVA as opposed to the QPF field not being broad enough for the more generic big warm advection/DCVA storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 this would be fun, Yes, it would be but between 00z and 03z it looks like you get one or two hundreths of an inch. That sounding is a bit misleading for ptype forecasting during the height of the storm. I do agree tyhat someone gets croaked. Hopefully it's me but I'm not terribly optimistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 That swath around Bob's house looks like a great spot onthis run. Goes to town for a while. 974 near the benchmark edit 978 need glasses It doesn't look all that great to me. I think we taint/rain for a decent amount of time with that look. The million dollar question is how fast do we flip back over. As Bob noted, 1 or 2 hour differences are huge.I think the box map is pretty good. I think that illustrates the most likely scenario for this area. Flips to heavy snow for a short period and we pick up a couple of inches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack66 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I know this may be too early to ask, but when do you think watches may go up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leesun Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 SLP on GFS appears to me to be too far north initially based on H5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Anyone think the precip shield will wind up being even more compact than modeled? It seems to me the models tend to "overdo" the precip shileds when you have one of these compact nukes feeding off DCVA as opposed to the QPF field not being broad enough for the more generic big warm advection/DCVA storms. If the GFS is right, it's more concentrated further SE IMO. You aren't getting a ton of moisture advection when it's forced out in one area leaving a narrow CCB. But, that is only speaking of the GFS verbatim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.