Jump to content

  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Possible Weekend Snowstorm, Jan 24 2015

ineedsnow

By ineedsnow,
in New England

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ORH_wxman

ORH_wxman

Posted
Posted

Harv seemed pretty subdued over this event...even implying that the follow up storm maybe more significant.

 

 

Tomorrow is the day to start hyping it if it's going to happen as a warning event or better.

 

There's still a lot of stuff that can go wrong in this.

 

 

00z GGEM looks SE of 12z...though not a shock considering it was the most amped of the solutions at 12z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weathafella

weathafella

Posted
Posted

Well he could. Except for s couple of mets on this forum I consider him one of the best. I've bern watching him since the late 70s when tv was the only source of info.

Harv's not riding the gfs. He's bg appropriately cautious still 3 days out. He knows the deal with gfs and he's arguably the dean of the ocm in New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FRWEATHA

FRWEATHA

Posted
Posted

Harv's not riding the gfs. He's bg appropriately cautious still 3 days out. He knows the deal with gfs and he's arguably the dean of the ocm in New England.

Yes. One of the best. I do think he explained how fickle this weekend deal is. You and I are not far as the crow flies but could be worlds apart in what we ultimately get.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thomasnh

thomasnh

Posted
Posted

People only see what they want to see. Being a statistician I struggle with how models are just disregarded? All data points must be accounted unless they are considered outliers though data is needed for this. The way I see all of these models are probability and that means no data point can be thrown out. Also all probability is calculated by known and probable variables which creates algorithms to give you these datapoints. So unless someone can tell me without bias why one model is better than the other no data point can be thrown out. All of these models are sampling the same data so the difference is the algorithm. Which means all data should be analyzed and proofs should be used to determine the validity of the data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SR Airglow

SR Airglow

Posted
Posted

It's drier though because there's a couple of weak vorts on the NW edge of the precip shield as a result of the phase not being great and as a result it acts as subsidence and kills the precip shield to the west, no good CCB either until it's pulling out(clips 495 east) really which means it's pretty warm. Verbatim most of SNE east of say ORH or south of BOS is +0 to +0.3 at 850 at the height of it, but it's showing a strong dynamic cooling signal towards the center of the bands and I think it would probably be an isothermal paste job verbatim, hard to know for sure though. Everyone goes to snow at the end and eastern areas(East of 128 say) grab 3-6"+ then.

 

1" QPF line is HVN to the NE corner of MA. 1.5" is SERI to Scott, 2"+ on the cape. 

Snowfall is 3-6" for most of CT. 6" line runs from south of Steve  north to the MA/CT border and then turns NE and clips the corner of SENH, then it goes down the coast to south of Scooter before turning WSW back to CT. 10" line is Scooter to TAN to extreme NE RI to Newburyport. Boston proper jackpot verbatim with 12" even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...