Jump to content

Model Discussion for Late January into February


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/21/2015 at 1:56 AM, mahk_webstah said:

Well for those of you who don't want to get invested, neither GYX or BOS seemd particularly excited.  I'm waiting til tomorrow.

It would be premature for them to do anything more then mention that a storm of some sort could impact the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 2:51 AM, dryslot said:

Its the 0z Nam but it is pretty amped and west with saturdays storm at 84 hrs fwiw, DC/NJ is rain

Wow!  That is really amped.  Maybe PF reels this one in? lol

 

That "kicker" has really trended so far north to be a non-factor here.  Lack of blocking means this could become a rather amped solution - my amateur forecasting skills deduce. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 2:58 AM, NorEastermass128 said:

Wow!  That is really amped.  Maybe PF reels this one in? lol

 

That "kicker" has really trended so far north to be a non-factor here.  Lack of blocking means this could become a rather amped solution - my amateur forecasting skills deduce. 

 

That looks like it would qualify as a hugger being that close to the coast which would present coastal problems as discussed earlier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 2:51 AM, dryslot said:

Its the 0z Nam but it is pretty amped and west with saturdays storm at 84 hrs fwiw, DC/NJ is rain

 

Exactly where you want it, the NAM is always amped/north/west at 84 hours with any developed storm system, you definitely don't want the NAM over the BM at this range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 2:58 AM, NorEastermass128 said:

Wow! That is really amped. Maybe PF reels this one in? lol

That "kicker" has really trended so far north to be a non-factor here. Lack of blocking means this could become a rather amped solution - my amateur forecasting skills deduce.

The NAM is always NW at the end of its run. Caution flag would be if it was SE, not NW. That's about all it's good for at this range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 3:01 AM, SnowGoose69 said:

Exactly where you want it, the NAM is always amped/north/west at 84 hours with any developed storm system, you definitely don't want the NAM over the BM at this range.

 

That's why i mentioned it, That's a flag to me, Although in the last event it was not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 2:58 AM, NorEastermass128 said:

Wow!  That is really amped.  Maybe PF reels this one in? lol

 

That "kicker" has really trended so far north to be a non-factor here.  Lack of blocking means this could become a rather amped solution - my amateur forecasting skills deduce. 

 

That H7 low looks like it would be nice for CNE/NNE haha.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/21/2015 at 3:01 AM, SnowGoose69 said:

Exactly where you want it, the NAM is always amped/north/west at 84 hours with any developed storm system, you definitely don't want the NAM over the BM at this range.

 

lol it was the least amped the entire time with this past storm.  

 

There were several ECM individual ensembles that look pretty close to that actually.  Low probability, but some time left to go.  That's why the EPS was so amped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...