Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

JAN 23-24 anyone ?


DTWXRISK

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Does that mean we taint more?  I would think that we would be okay... as long as the SLP is moving ENE or NE out to sea

 

The track of the surface low is not determinative of subtle nuances over DC metro....That is why we have soundings and high res models....detecting mixing and subtle differences between rain/snow/sleet over a small area by using the sfc low is something that was probably done in 1953....the track is important, but not every track is going to yield the same result....it is different every storm...we could get rain with that track..other features are of crucial importance..you realize that though...you have been following models for 12 years....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks pretty much like the op. Draw a line from Pamlico sound to 40/70

 

Somehow not too much of a surprise at this point that it's mirroring the ops.  I know you mentioned there are virtually no lows east of OBX, but what's the spread like approaching the VA/NC border?  Either way, as has been said many times, we're looking at a real knife-edge here.

 

 

I am ready to discuss the NAM ad nausem

 

Since it's the NAM, it might be more like "reductio ad absurdum!" :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...