Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Winter medium range model pbp I


GaWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I agree FULLY!!  GFS is very close around here yes MCN to some snow.  I know verbatim its a big NO, but it wouldn't take much.

 

Well, if we had the Pacific blocked up, I would give you guys down in the extreme deep south the green light, referring again to December 1989 & February 1973, you don't necessarily need the NAO to be down, but the Pacific usually has to cooperate if the Atlantic doesn't. Although the Equatorial VP looks fantastic, potentially poised to rack up the 9th winter storm in a row in central NC when the -VP was over 30-60E, I don't like the trough axis extending from the Gulf of Alaska thru Alaska itself. If only we had this setup a couple of weeks later when the jet wavelengths were considerably shorter, I'd feel a lot better about our chances...

 

I'm torn between whether to buy into history & climatological behavior of the pattern response to troughing over Alaska (which usually isn't all that favorable for wintry wx in the south) that doesn't favor this event occurring or continue to ride my red hot Equatorial VP research which is 8 for 8 on winter storms in central NC since I began to monitor it's evolution. (All 7 RAH events since the beginning of last winter & the historic snowfall in & around Columbia on November 1st). This will be fun to watch w/ the mean epicenter of the active cell of the MJO closing in on that pivotal 30-60E band. I have my popcorn ready... :)

 

Maybe I should just split it right up the middle & go w/ a flizzard on this one, lol

28.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK... I have a test of the GFS going on. 

I'm capturing all 4 model runs beginning with 06Z Saturday, for 06Z Tuesday the 27th. and saving images of the following:

 

NH 500 MB temps

NH 500 MB  temp anomalies

NH 850 MB temps

NH 850 MB temp anomalies

Conus T2

Conus 6hr precip-ptype-mslp

Conus 850t-precip

 

All of this will be loops of each type. That way you can see the model changes day by day for each particular category. There are only 4 images in the loops so far but I will add additional images after the model runs are complete. Use the forward and backward buttons to toggle between images.

 

Here's a link to the 500 MB anomalies and there are links on this page to take you to the other loops. 

http://www.daculaweather.com/4_gfs_test_500mb_anom_loop.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS @ 132

 

gfs00_PT.30.gif?t=1421569369

 

@ 144

 

gfs00_PT.31.gif?t=1421569369

 

CMC @ 120

 

gemglb00_PT.29.gif?t=1421568682

 

@ 132

 

gemglb00_PT.30.gif?t=1421568682

 

EURO @ 120

 

f120.gif

 

@ 144

 

f144.gif

 

GFS Ensembles @ e-WALL are showing various depictions of this storm as well.  As others have stated, temps will be a factor, except maybe the northern fringe. But overall I like the look.  We don't want to be in the bullseye at this stage in the game anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the DGEX, an extension of the NAM if I understand correctly, has a clown map that is usually largely a joke (after all, the DGEX model overall is a clown), it probably shouldn't be totally ignored in this case. One reason is that this is not at all a ZR/IP situation, which is one thing that I think causes the DGEX to overdo things on its clown (similar to the Euro). Also, as mentioned, the Euro as well as the NEW GFS, both have a warm bias at 2M causing their clowns to potentially underdo things in this case. I'll put it this way. I would rather have the DGEX on our side than against it in this case. I so wish that the old Goofy were still running, especially because it didn't have a warm bias at 2M.

By the way, I loved the 6Z GFS as one might guess. The ball game is very much back on (it really never had ended).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes everything is a challenge here in the south has to be perfect but id rather have it suppressed at the moment compared to a cutter. Ive heard the same from others. I think the 6z could evolve into something doable down the line. NEXT cmon big dog lets go deep sea fishin mack!!!!!!Reel these boys in a monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks,

I like the 12Z GFS run, the third GFS run in a row with a bonafide Miller A. I love where it is almost as much as if it showed an actual widespread snow.

We already have had more than enough runs of the various models to allow us to assume that just a little jog back north (like on the 0Z GFS, GFS/Euro runs from Thu night and earlier, and the several members of yesterday's 12Z GEFS) could easily put many well inland board members into a sig snowfall of multiple inches on 1/22-3 the modeled 2M temperatures be darned.

We have also had incredibly good agreement going back some 4-5 days on the timing of some Gulf precip generating system being centered on late 1/22 through much of 1/23. How often does that happen from 8-9 days out and doesn't materialize at all with at least some precip in the SE (wintry or not)? I say not often at all.

When one also considers that model consensus generally has more of a tendency to move back north with the track than to move the other way, especially when it was further north earlier, these just a little but too far south tracks are still a pleasure to see. Add to this the late Jan climo, which is about as good as any other part of winter for much of the SE for these to occur. Furthermore, a weakish Miller A moving ENE from the W GOM off of S TX to over N FL and then offshore the SE US (with some strengthening once out there) is about the most common track for major, widespread SE snowstorms that I've been able to find based on looking at wx maps going back well over 100 years.

Put this all together and I can't help but at be hopeful/kind of excited about the possibilities even knowing it still may end up as nothing wintry. I always know that to be the case in just about any potential event due to the relative rarity of widespread, sig. SE snowstorms. That keeps me grounded. I'm not going to Vegas right now to bet on a sig winter storm for many. It is still too early to even consider doing that. All I want to have at this stage is reasonable hope for something really nice wintrywise and I have that hope. Game on. Let's see what actually happens.

Regarding a phase that results in a stronger but further north track, that would obviously take out many in the more southern areas though there are no absolute parameters. Keep in mind that there's a reason that only 3 of 32 Miller A's that have produced major SN or IP at Atlanta have had a lowest SLP while still in the Gulf that was under 1000 mb. One was the 3/1993 Storm of the Century, which gave them the bulk of their SN on the backside, and two others were in the 995-999 range. So, getting a strong low typically doesn't excite me down in GA as I see it more than likely being detrimental to chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing what jet wavelengths can do to a setup like this, the stronger jet and longer wavelengths are going to be a primary contributor to the suppression of this storm, and will shove it further to the south & east... OTOH, if we had this coming about 3-5 weeks later into @ least the 2nd week of February, it would be game, set, match for a snowstorm in the SE US. not so much now however, as we're likely going to be splitting hairs to receive considerable wintry precipitation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...