Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2015 ENSO super thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 469
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Statistical models are still more of a weaker ENSO. I think the odds of something stronger than this past winter may be higher, but I wouldn't get excited for moderate quite yet.

http://iri.columbia.edu/our-expertise/climate/forecasts/enso/current/

Per this evening's free weekly newsletter, LC still doesn't think we'll have El Niño this summer and even thinks we'll have neutral negative! I don't agree at all as I'm expecting El Nino. However, if he somehow gets this correct, it would be one of the greatest seasonal calls in a number of years:

"Part of the issue here is whether we will have an El Nino that builds through the summer into the fall and winter of 2015. I say no, on the idea that the general mean of forecasts are skewed due to the crazy depiction shown by the PC/CFS outlook (+2.8 deviation at peak). There are a number of outlooks that predict a neutral ENSO anomaly signal. Since the tropics are booming with thunderstorms, and drought appears to be at a minimum in the 'usual suspect' places like Africa, Indonesia, Australia, and South America, the scenario shaping up is to favor a gradual cooling of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to a slightly negative phase this coming summer."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite wish-cast there. I think it was done to sustain the integrity of LC's hurricane season forecast. Without a new OHC update, we will not be able to fully grasp the extent of sustainment for this warm ENSO.

 

For all we know, there could be a huge pool of heat down to 350 meters. I still think we will enter into permanent el nino sometime this century, similar to the Pliocene pacific state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite wish-cast there. I think it was done to sustain the integrity of LC's hurricane season forecast. Without a new OHC update, we will not fully grasp the extent of sustainment for this warm ENSO.

For all we know, there could be a huge pool of heat down to 350 meters. I still think we will enter into permanent el nino sometime this century, similar to the Pliocene pacific state.

What do you mean permanent El Niño? Do you mean that the waters in Niño 3.4 will be permanently 0.5 C or warmer than the surrounding waters to the north and south? If so, why would that be the case?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean permanent El Niño? Do you mean that the waters in Niño 3.4 will be permanently 0.5 C or warmer than the surrounding waters to the north and south? If so, why would that be the case?

Evidence for El Niño– like conditions during the Pliocene

http://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/16/3/pdf/i1052-5173-16-3-4.pdf

 

Apparently there are many similarities to current conditions, including a reduced latitudinal SST gradient across the pacific ocean and significant evolution in ocean heat transport systems.

 

To the best of my knowledge, it would be a permanent el nino in relation to the 20th century average. The sub-tropical pacific would also warm rapidly as the hadley cells expand.

 

 

 

SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS Compilation of data from across the tropical Pacific indicates that surface and thermocline conditions were similar on both sides of the basin, resembling a permanent El Niño, during the warm Pliocene, and that the modern-day east-west asymmetry of the equatorial Pacific developed through the Pliocene as climate cooled. What are the global implications of this transition in tropical Pacific conditions over the past 5 m.y.? The transition is thought to have a global impact on terrestrial climate because data-based reconstructions of continental climate anomalies during the early Pliocene compared to today have an El Niño–like fingerprint (Molnar and Cane, 2002); however, the nature of teleconnections between tropical and extratropical regions that operate over long time scales will need further investigation. Observational data support the idea that the depth of the thermocline determines the strength of air-sea interactions that sustain Walker circulation with farfield global effects (Philander and Fedorov, 2003b). More specifically, shoaling of the thermocline in the eastern equatorial Pacific occurred as the amplitude of glacial-interglacial cycles increased; it appears that as the thermocline shoaled, air-sea coupling increased, and the feedbacks that amplify solar forcing of glacial-interglacial cycles were strengthened (Ravelo et al., 2004). Studies that show further strengthening of the eastwest SST difference across the Pacific at the mid-Pleistocene transition (de Garidel-Thoron et al., 2005; McClymont and Rosell-Melé, 2005; Medina-Elizalde and Lea, 2005) also attest to the possible role of tropical Pacific air-sea interactions in the amplification of climate variability

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per this evening's free weekly newsletter, LC still doesn't think we'll have El Niño this summer and even thinks we'll have neutral negative! I don't agree at all as I'm expecting El Nino. However, if he somehow gets this correct, it would be one of the greatest seasonal calls in a number of years:

"Part of the issue here is whether we will have an El Nino that builds through the summer into the fall and winter of 2015. I say no, on the idea that the general mean of forecasts are skewed due to the crazy depiction shown by the PC/CFS outlook (+2.8 deviation at peak). There are a number of outlooks that predict a neutral ENSO anomaly signal. Since the tropics are booming with thunderstorms, and drought appears to be at a minimum in the 'usual suspect' places like Africa, Indonesia, Australia, and South America, the scenario shaping up is to favor a gradual cooling of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to a slightly negative phase this coming summer."

That's so unlikely without a major pattern change.

At this time last year subsurface warmth was already being torn to shreds.

That's not happening this year.

And wind forecasts don't show it happening anytime soon.

Zpp8xem.jpg

QrIsP4t.jpg

FcZg8KN.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unc,

Thanks for the update on the warming weekly. Consistent with this, the Cowan number as of 6Z today of +1.164 is the warmest I can recall since I started following his graph (last year I think). The chance of the 2nd year Nino ONI (3 month average) peaking only in weak is rapidly dwindling while the chance for strong is obviously increasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest April ENSO statistical model average is for a weak Nino peak while the dynamical model average is moderate intensity.

 

Right now I'm leaning toward a low-end moderate peak (+1.0c to +1.2c).

 

http://iri.columbia.edu/our-expertise/climate/forecasts/enso/current/

 

Average, dynamical models 0.8 1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1

 

 

Average, statistical models 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9

 

 

Average, all models 0.7 0.8 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As forecast earlier, another strong WWB has emerged over the equatorial WPAC in conjunction with a nice atmospheric kelvin wave, which has helped kick off some TC genesis. The MJO is forecast to come to life over the next week or so and may help sustain it.

 

The western warm pool is still strong and elongated to the east, which will likely help increase the odds of follow-on WWBs in that area(at least to my understanding here).

 

Nino4 SSTs have stayed stubbornly high (and are now up to a whopping +1.4), but this doesn't appear to have halted Nino development in the eastern portion of the basin as the trades have been very weak nearly basin-wide over the past 2 weeks or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warm Water Volume 5-month running average in the main ENSO regions is now higher than last year and highest since the 1997-1998 "super Nino."    

 

I wonder how accurate those WWV estimates are for the 1982 super El Nino.  I'm skeptical of those values, which are indicated here as being little more than half the values in 1997, yet 1982 was just a hair below 1997 in terms of Nino 3.4 and beats 1997 in terms of SOI and MEI. 

 

Speaking of SOI, the 30-day moving average has really taken a tumble as of late, below -10 now:

https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/seasonalclimateoutlook/southernoscillationindex/30daysoivalues/

 

If we can get a sustained period of 30-day averages below -15, that could be signs that we're going into a strong El Nino. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SST is a very poor method of diagnosing ENSO strength.  Depending on the degree of coupling, it's borderline irrelevant.  Many metrics suggest 82-83 was stronger than 97-98, including the MEI, which is still a basic metric, but much more thought out than that ONI thing or any other SST-only garbage.

 

MEI indicates this to be the 6th strongest on record at this juncture.  Water vapor imagery this week is textbook el Nino.  I like where we're going with this one.  Looking forward to a fun el Nino-filled next 12 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SST is a very poor method of diagnosing ENSO strength.  Depending on the degree of coupling, it's borderline irrelevant.  Many metrics suggest 82-83 was stronger than 97-98, including the MEI, which is still a basic metric, but much more thought out than that ONI thing or any other SST-only garbage.

 

MEI indicates this to be the 6th strongest on record at this juncture.  Water vapor imagery this week is textbook el Nino.  I like where we're going with this one.  Looking forward to a fun el Nino-filled next 12 months.

 

I wouldn't quite say that.  The atmosphere forces the ocean (e.g. westerly wind bursts) while the ocean forces the atmosphere (shift of the Pacific warm pool undoubtedly alters the Walker circulation).  If you have sufficient ocean warming, it's going to alter the global circulation, period.  Of course in borderline El Nino events where you have lots of other factors at play, the ENSO signal can become overwhelmed. 

 

I agree that regardless of metric, this current warm phase is currently looking impressive at this juncture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SST is a very poor method of diagnosing ENSO strength.  Depending on the degree of coupling, it's borderline irrelevant.  Many metrics suggest 82-83 was stronger than 97-98, including the MEI, which is still a basic metric, but much more thought out than that ONI thing or any other SST-only garbage.

 

MEI indicates this to be the 6th strongest on record at this juncture.  Water vapor imagery this week is textbook el Nino.  I like where we're going with this one.  Looking forward to a fun el Nino-filled next 12 months.

So this Nino is forecast to max out at strong? I thought it was mod or weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several computer models are forecasting an event more significant than the 1997 super El Nino.

I'll leave it up to you how much faith to put into them.

U7faf1x.png

interesting. Also looks like whatever the peak is, its more likely to peak in fall rather than winter. Im mostly interested in el nino to see what, if any, impact it has on local weather. Even then enso is only one factor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone briefly give me an idea of what the "normal" warm ENSO weather is for summer/fall in the south central US (OK/AR/TX)?

 

NOAA has ENSO anomaly maps here - http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/ENSO/composites/

 

Choose the parameter (temp/precip) across the top and the tri-monthly period on the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...