Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January Banter


mackerel_sky

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've been on weather boards for years and love winter weather events.  If you're a winter lover like myself, I don't care what you say on the board, deep down you're disappointed when the models shift like today.  Can things change in future runs? Sure.  But you see that foot of snow the models were giving you yesterday taken away today, you can't help but to feel some disappointment.  Of course, this is just my opinion.  If this makes me a weenie so be it.  At least I'm an honest weenie.

 

 

 I do think that long range solutions that put down a massive amount of SN in the SE (say close to a foot+ outside of the mountains and perhaps GSO) should almost always be dismissed as pure fantasy with extremely high odds against it in the long range based on climo, which shows that they're the rare exception rather than the rule. Actually, a place like Atlanta has none on record since 1879! A place like RDU has had a couple but we're talking only a once a mutidecade type of occurrence. These extreme solutions do not do much other than result in disappointment when they don't materialize. The problem is that some people buy into them as a reasonable possibility. OTOH, a run that gives, say 4-10" (still major) is much more reasonable (especially the 4-8" range) and shouldn't normally be dismissed as an extreme dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm cautiously optimistic. I doubt we've seen the last of the storm on the models, and I'm hopeful that subsequent runs come back better than ever. However, I'm a little worried about the situation because what the models are showing, with the magnitude of cold forcing the moisture south, is certainly a viable solution. Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how often it just goes away versus going away and then coming back down the road. Or is it better for nothing to show up until about 3 to 5 days beforehand?

 

That is what I mean. I have never seen a model nail an event from 240 without big changes and not losing it.

 

(Can't believe I agree with Brick)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm cautiously optimistic. I doubt we've seen the last of the storm on the models, and I'm hopeful that subsequent runs come back better than ever. However, I'm a little worried about the situation because what the models are showing, with the magnitude of cold forcing the moisture south, is certainly a viable solution. Time will tell.

 

You have to hate it when the reason you don't have snow is because it's too cold for the precip to get here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't exactly been a great winter.

 

 

Bored people are bored.

 

It's really been boring, weather-wise, for like 10 months or so now.

Yeah, I agree. It's been incredibly boring. But 10 day storms rarely work out as initially shown. As bad as it's been, that expectation should not change. If the models are right and we're headed into a colder regime, there will be chances. We don't need to track them in from 10 days. They'll pop up. My biggest concern isn't whether a SW piece of energy comes out 10 days from now. It's getting a favorable pattern to deliver cold into the SE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is way to much lamenting over a 10 day snowstorm.

 

Yep, we have seen this like how many times now.  There is a reason we have had 10 inches of snow total over the past 14 winters months (30% of climo in almost 5 winters).  Meanwhile the MA is going to get 10" of snow in about 2 weeks this month just from renegade clippers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I do think that long range solutions that put down a massive amount of SN in the SE (say close to a foot+ outside of the mountains and perhaps GSO) should almost always be dismissed as pure fantasy with extremely high odds against it in the long range based on climo, which shows that they're the rare exception rather than the rule. Actually, a place like Atlanta has none on record since 1879! A place like RDU has had a couple but we're talking only a once a mutidecade type of occurrence. These extreme solutions do not do much other than result in disappointment when they don't materialize. The problem is that some people buy into them as a reasonable possibility. OTOH, a run that gives, say 4-10" (still major) is much more reasonable (especially the 4-8" range) and shouldn't normally be dismissed as an extreme dream.

 

Hey Larry...I agree completely but there is always that small part of you that hopes it can happen.  Now realistically I know the odds are not in my favor.  After following weather and models for 10 years I know how the game is played but there will always be a small part of me that "hopes" it'll happen. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Larry...I agree completely but there is always that small part of you that hopes it can happen.  Now realistically I know the odds are not in my favor.  After following weather and models for 10 years I know how the game is played but there will always be a small part of me that "hopes" it'll happen. :)

 

I would be happy right now if we can just get a good event, like 4 inches of snow. Right now that doesn't seem likely just based on today's runs. Plenty of time for it to change, but I am not encouraged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus is the worst first half of winter of my life besides 2011-2012. I don't have a ton of years to draw from, but this is just awful. Fab Feb might save us, but most of us haven't even seen snow fall yet, which is a joke. There's no sugarcoating it. At least 2011-2012 was warm, so it was comfortable outside.

It's nice to have company. Time for Lucy to have a white flag in her hand. We knew how this was going to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus is the worst first half of winter of my life besides 2011-2012. I don't have a ton of years to draw from, but this is just awful. Fab Feb might save us, but most of us haven't even seen snow fall yet, which is a joke. There's no sugarcoating it. At least 2011-2012 was warm, so it was comfortable outside.

Good news is next winter should be a repeat of 11/12. #pacflip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I do think that long range solutions that put down a massive amount of SN in the SE (say close to a foot+ outside of the mountains and perhaps GSO) should almost always be dismissed as pure fantasy with extremely high odds against it in the long range based on climo, which shows that they're the rare exception rather than the rule. Actually, a place like Atlanta has none on record since 1879! A place like RDU has had a couple but we're talking only a once a mutidecade type of occurrence. These extreme solutions do not do much other than result in disappointment when they don't materialize. The problem is that some people buy into them as a reasonable possibility. OTOH, a run that gives, say 4-10" (still major) is much more reasonable (especially the 4-8" range) and shouldn't normally be dismissed as an extreme dream.

That's crazy. How does Atlanta not have a foot of snow in any storm in 135 years ? Even Birmingham and Macon and Columbia have had storms of that magnitude. I think even Columbus has had one too. Has Charleston or Savannah had storms of a foot or greater ? Maybe one of these days Atlanta's 1,000' + elevation will come in handy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...