Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January Banter


mackerel_sky

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Seasonable and normal are nearly interchangeable terms, 5 degrees above normal (even for a 5 day average) is hardly much of an anomaly & is commonly observed at some point in every season, even outside of winter... At those temperatures, you're not roasting...

I never used the term "roasting". Again, as I mentioned, in my many years of professional experience, +5F above (or -5F below) is not considered seasonable. Have you observed otherwise in your profession? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are going to get a big snow this winter.  You don't want to be over the cliff when it comes, do you?

 

Yes, snow is dead to me after Feb 20th.  Pre-emergent goes out Valentines day or so and soccer starts up.  I want to roast...oh I mean be seasonably warm to mild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called shotgun earlier!  Everyone else can have the backseat.

 

I really thought going through 05-08 was going to be the worst stretch of winters we would have to experience for a while but with 11/12, 12/13 and now 14/15 we are darn close.  I could argue that 13/14 was a let down with getting fringed so bad to the west and then to the east on the Jan 28th and Feb 12th events and then just missing the early March event.  But that seems to be the norm now.  And let's not forget that debacle that was Jan 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never used the term "roasting". Again, as I mentioned, in my many years of professional experience, +5F above (or -5F below) is not considered seasonable. Have you observed otherwise in your profession? 

 

I never accused you of using the term "roasting" & it's really a matter of opinion... The occurrence of temperatures 5F or -5F from normal is common enough to be termed as "seasonable". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really thought going through 05-08 was going to be the worst stretch of winters we would have to experience for a while but with 11/12, 12/13 and now 14/15 we are darn close.  I could argue that 13/14 was a let down with getting fringed so bad to the west and then to the east on the Jan 28th and Feb 12th events and then just missing the early March event.  But that seems to be the norm now.  And let's not forget that debacle that was Jan 2011.

 

Yeah its been a brutal lately. "Thread the needle" is becoming a yearly term for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never accused you of using the term "roasting" & it's really a matter of opinion... The occurrence of temperatures 5F or -5F from normal is common enough to be termed as "seasonable". 

 

Let's just leave it at that...a matter of opinion. It has been many years since I have been on weather boards so I will need to remember I am not writing or editing manuscripts for publication here...just having some fun talking about the weather. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just leave it at that...a matter of opinion. It has been many years since I have been on weather boards so I will need to remember I am not writing or editing manuscripts for publication here...just having some fun talking about the weather. 

 

Neither am I, but I challenge you to look @ the data for yourself before you solidify your opinion...

http://www.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=rah

 

The occurrence of temperatures at or exceeding +/-5F from normal is very common here in central NC, or throughout much of the southeastern US for that matter, hence why I used the term "seasonable". There does come a point when actual data trumps even what may superficially appear as a viable opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither am I, but I challenge you to look @ the data for yourself before you solidify your opinion...

http://www.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=rah

 

The occurrence of temperatures at or exceeding +/-5F from normal is very common here in central NC, or throughout much of the southeastern US for that matter, hence why I used the term "seasonable". There does come a point when actual data trumps even what may superficially appear as a viable opinion...

 

 I am not even sure what you are talking about here at this point. Where do you work in the profession may I ask? What exactly are you "challenging" me to do?. For full disclosure, I am a numerical weather prediction scientist with over 15 years in the profession. I earned my BS, MS and PhD degrees in atmospheric science. In NWP science and verification parlance, +/-5F is certainly not termed "seasonable" or "normal"...although those are not terms that we use for verification. Perhaps those terms are used more frequently in your part of field for those thresholds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not even sure what you are talking about here at this point. Where do you work in the profession may I ask? What exactly are you "challenging" me to do?. For full disclosure, I am a numerical weather prediction scientist with over 15 years in the profession. I earned my BS, MS and PhD degrees in atmospheric science. In NWP science and verification parlance, +/-5F is certainly not termed "seasonable" or "normal"...although those are not terms that we use for verification. Perhaps those terms are used more frequently in your part of field for those thresholds.

He's a smart guy but he's only a teenager. Doesn't have a profession.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I am not even sure what you are talking about here at this point. Where do you work in the profession may I ask? What exactly are you "challenging" me to do?. For full disclosure, I am a numerical weather prediction scientist with over 15 years in the profession. I earned my BS, MS and PhD degrees in atmospheric science. In NWP science and verification parlance, +/-5F is certainly not termed "seasonable" or "normal"...although those are not terms that we use for verification. Perhaps those terms are used more frequently in your part of field for those thresholds. 

 

Wow...  Go get your red tag with all of those degrees (message a moderator or staff member through PM)  You are highly qualified, please post more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a smart guy but he's only a teenager. Doesn't have a profession.

Thanks for the information. It is great to see young folks so interested in the weather. This looks like a great group of people here with much passion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I am not even sure what you are talking about here at this point. Where do you work in the profession may I ask? What exactly are you "challenging" me to do?. For full disclosure, I am a numerical weather prediction scientist with over 15 years in the profession. I earned my BS, MS and PhD degrees in atmospheric science. In NWP science and verification parlance, +/-5F is certainly not termed "seasonable" or "normal"...although those are not terms that we use for verification. Perhaps those terms are used more frequently in your part of field for those thresholds. 

 

All I'm saying is here's the actual data (which goes back in many stations to 1887), go out & prove it to me that +/-5F is somehow not "seasonable" & then we'll talk. I could really care less about what degree you hold or your prior experiences, I'm just interested in what the data says...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nwp and webber, would you mind taking your intense discussion, which is interesting, to banter. It isn't all that relevant to pattern discussion imo. Please?

 

 

Oh yeah it's really interesting. +5 for a day, seasonal(ish). +5 for a week, warm. +5 for a month, torch. It's all about the size of the data set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'm saying is here's the actual data (which goes back in many stations to 1887), go out & prove it to me that +/-5F is somehow not "seasonable" & then we'll talk. I could really care less about what degree you hold or your prior experiences, I'm just interested in what the data says...

 

And, that's about where it would be a good idea to take the advice I gave you earlier in the PBP thread.  Come on, man.  Respect the knowledge and the degrees.  They don't hand 'em out for free.  You'll have yours in a few years, I'm quite sure.  There are other ways to make your points without belittling the individual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'm saying is here's the actual data (which goes back in many stations to 1887), go out & prove it to me that +/-5F is somehow not "seasonable" & then we'll talk. I could really care less about what degree you hold or your prior experiences, I'm just interested in what the data says...

It is great to see folks with such a passion for the weather. Just to be clear, there is nothing to "prove" or "disprove" here about the +/-5F thresholds. In my profession, those thresholds are not considered "seasonable" or "normal"...period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I am not even sure what you are talking about here at this point. Where do you work in the profession may I ask? What exactly are you "challenging" me to do?. For full disclosure, I am a numerical weather prediction scientist with over 15 years in the profession. I earned my BS, MS and PhD degrees in atmospheric science. In NWP science and verification parlance, +/-5F is certainly not termed "seasonable" or "normal"...although those are not terms that we use for verification. Perhaps those terms are used more frequently in your part of field for those thresholds. 

 

 

This is from the NWS in Raleigh. They define the "normal" temperature range with about 18-20 degree spread, meaning that +/- 8-10F from "average" is considered normal or seasonable. Thus far this month Raleigh has averaged about -1.45F below normal, the winter thus far since December 1st, +.234, both are fairly close to normal in their own respect.

Raleigh-NC-Average-Temperature-851x1024.

 

The US temperature distribution in the first half of the month closely followed my Warm Neutral-Weak El Nino composites, however just like in December, a more "traditional" El Nino look is trying to take over w/ the core of the cold being centered towards Texas... We should end up w/ the core of the coldest anoms. vs normals in the SE US & on the E coast in February, which is essentially a colder modification of December in a broad sense.

ncep_cfsr_noram_t2m_anom.png

 

US-Winter-Monthly-Temps-DJF-El-Nino-Plac

 

It is great to see folks with such a passion for the weather. Just to be clear, there is nothing to "prove" or "disprove" here about the +/-5F thresholds. In my profession, those thresholds are not considered "seasonable" or "normal"...period.

 

Ok then, I'm going to ask the same question as Dacula, what do you define as "normal" or seasonable, because this is obviously going against what the NWS & I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'm saying is here's the actual data (which goes back in many stations to 1887), go out & prove it to me that +/-5F is somehow not "seasonable" & then we'll talk. I could really care less about what degree you hold or your prior experiences, I'm just interested in what the data says...

Back off, and I mean right now. You in way over your head here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...