Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January Med/Long Range Disco


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

  The GFS   SOLUTION here is  just  total  BULL****

 

 at  SOME point the AO  many finally  go negative...    BUT  the    ECMWF  EPS  AO   is  WAAAAAAY positive  

and it stays   there  through JAN  25

 

Is it? Could it?

 

ao.sprd2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

DT, except that the EPS have the EPO tanking and sending the cold into the western USA again.

I liked seeing the shift on the 12z run not confining it to the west like the last couple runs. It was a shift towards the gefs. Pretty far down the line to dissect but it was an improved run for us eastern folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked seeing the shift on the 12z run not confining it to the west like the last couple runs. It was a shift towards the gefs. Pretty far down the line to dissect but it was an improved run for us eastern folks.

 

Yeah I think most numerical guidance has been indicating the same idea: warm-up in 6-10 day and then a shift to cold in the West with EPO after that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS SOLUTION here is just total BULL****

at SOME point the AO many finally go negative... BUT the ECMWF EPS AO is WAAAAAAY positive

and it stays there through JAN 25

The 12z eps run was the first time in at least the last 3-4 that didn't take it neutral or negative. 12z drops to neutral around the 18th or so but never goes over +1sd after that from what I'm seeing. I'm skeptical about going negative because we haven't been there of any consequence since Nov but personally, I'm not all that worried either way. If the epo does in fact push and build higher heights around the pole then we aren't in a shutout pattern. If the GEFS is more right than the eps in the d11-15 range it wouldn't surprise me either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think most numerical guidance has been indicating the same idea: warm-up in 6-10 day and then a shift to cold in the West with EPO after that...

I'm a bit relieved that a "resolution" to the relaxation is coming into focus fairly quickly. I didn't like seeing the goa trough and all those flat isobars @ h5 slamming into the west coast when it first showed up. It took us weeks to shake that kind of deal in Dec. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several El Niño years and years with similar SST to this year had a much more -AO. We are in the small class of years that go against that, lol. As far as El Niño, you'll recognize some of these which had an elevated AO:

 

1991-92

1972-73

1982-83

1994-95

2006-07

2004-05

1951-52

 

Some of these did switch in February....a few did not. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit relieved that a "resolution" to the relaxation is coming into focus fairly quickly. I didn't like seeing the goa trough and all those flat isobars @ h5 slamming into the west coast when it first showed up. It took us weeks to shake that kind of deal in Dec. lol.

 

Yeah! lol...the warm-up with the jet extension/EPO was easy to see. What wasn't as easy to see what the follow-up jet retracting and retrograding, leading to another -EPO. This should prevent a full-blown December outcome again. Obviously, if those two things do not occur, well December repeat is ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah! lol...the warm-up with the jet extension/EPO was easy to see. What wasn't as easy to see what the follow-up jet retracting and retrograding, leading to another -EPO. This should prevent a full-blown December outcome again. Obviously, if those two things do not occur, well December repeat is ahead.

 
Hopefully the atlantic reshuffles a bit. Some hints that the unflappable +nao is going to make a move at least towards neutralish. Ridging keeps showing up over or east of Greenland on the GFS down the line. And the low heights over iceland that have been in place since what feels like the beginning of time may move out. 
 
Interesting look for entertainment here...
 
 
gfs_polar_360_500_vort_ht.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob, have you noticed that the models are trying to upwell a warm anomaly over N. America into the stratosphere in 2 weeks? The EPO ridge is strong/permanent enough to resonate into the stratosphere. It could possibly signal yet another wave 2. I'm bringing this up to refer back to our conversation earlier in the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob, have you noticed that the models are trying to upwell a warm anomaly over N. America into the stratosphere in 2 weeks? The EPO ridge is strong/permanent enough to resonate into the stratosphere. It could possibly signal yet another wave 2. I'm bringing this up to refer back to our conversation earlier in the week.

 

I look at strat maps every day but I never post about them. I'm too dumb on the subject. I see what your talking about but I don't really grasp temps as much as height plots. GFS has been set on a very elongated and disturbed vortex late in the runs from 100mb on up for a while. I can imagine that any anomalous and stable ridging in the troposphere pressing poleward from any side is our friend right now. Something has to break and I hope it isn't my hopes and dreams. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several El Niño years and years with similar SST to this year had a much more -AO. We are in the small class of years that go against that, lol. As far as El Niño, you'll recognize some of these which had an elevated AO:

 

1991-92

1972-73

1982-83

1994-95

2006-07

2004-05

1951-52

 

Some of these did switch in February....a few did not. :/

 

All of the +ENSO years w/ +AO in December & January that didn't flip in February (1992-93, 1972-73, 1991-92, & 1994-95) were all in the cold multidecadal AMO phase. Coincidence? Nope... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the +ENSO years w/ +AO in December & January that didn't flip in February (1992-93, 1972-73, 1991-92, & 1994-95) were all in the cold multidecadal AMO phase. Coincidence? Nope... 

 

Some would argue we are currently in the process of flipping to a cold phase but I don't see much evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS SOLUTION here is just total BULL****

at SOME point the AO many finally go negative... BUT the ECMWF EPS AO is WAAAAAAY positive

and it stays there through JAN 25

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you write a lengthy post a while back explaining how the Euro ens completely busted on the forecast for late Dec-early Jan?

Why are you so confident that they will be proven correct this time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some would argue we are currently in the process of flipping to a cold phase but I don't see much evidence.

 

It's certainly exceedingly difficult to pin down if we're actually seeing a multidecadal flip because our reliable record only encompasses enough time to observe a few phase shifts and relying on the premise of a 25-30 yr resonance period isn't wise, and there are clearly other factors that play a large role in the AMO. Most notably of which @ least to my knowledge is the ENSO index... On shorter timescales, it's well known that particularly during +ENSO/El Nino events, the AMO responds positively, because an El Nino invigorates the subtropical jet in the Pacific/western hemisphere, which in the Atlantic, feeds back to cooler than normal SSTs in the subtropics... The cooler SSTs also provide a positive feedback on the atmospheric heights, causing them to lower in the subtropics, thus weakening the Azores-Bermuda High and hence the northeasterly trade winds, and it's this reduced wind stress that is imparted onto the tropical Atlantic that leads to a net warming of the deep tropics and a re-establishment of the +AMO signature. It's not just mere happenstance that the mean El Nino Winter 500mb is nearly a carbon copy of the +AMO...

 

AMO DJF 500mb height correlation

DJF-N-Hem-500mb-AMO-Regression.gif

 

Top 20 El Ninos since 1950 DJF 500mb mean height anomaly

DJF-N-Hem-500mb-Top-20-El-Ninos.png

 

Essentially ENSO acts as a battery for the AMO, w/ El Ninos recharging the AMO, while La Ninas through enhanced easterly trades, higher tropical cyclone frequency, etc, favor a net discharge, and even over long periods of time, ENSO can dictate the behavior of the AMO even though its own internal variance at least makes it quasi-independent.

MEI-AMO-boxed-1950-2013.jpg

 

 

 

AMO-MEI Cross Correlation, MEI leads the AMO index by ~10 months

MEI-Cross-correlation-to-AMO-AMM.png

 

The recent lull in Atlantic hurricane activity is unusual for the multidecadal +AMO phase (but not unexpected if one gave the interdecadal ENSO performance a look) and is analogous to the mid-late 1930s when following the record-breaking hurricane season of 1933 (has ~10 more ACE points than 2005), the dearth of El Ninos to recharge the AMO was subsequently followed by relatively quieter hurricane seasons until the Atlantic emerged out the other end of the 1939-42 multi yr El Nino event...

 

Atlantic-Hurricane-ACE-1851-Present-5-yr

Looking at the Atlantic Hurricane ACE activity smoothed over 5 year intervals, it becomes relatively easy to pick out interdecadal trends, and considering the lack of El Ninos in the mid-late 1930s & 1940s, it's not surprising to see the dramatic downturn in Atlantic ACE during this period despite a conducive multidecadal phase. It's plausible to conclude that we've already peaked in this warm phase and the -PDO regime flip in the mid-late 2000s along w/ the shortage of El Ninos, especially w/ the ongoing El Nino drought that has remained since 2009-10 were (& still are) red flags that the AMO was going to falter sooner rather than later. As far as a full-blown regime flip, I'm quite uncertain, but we're still in the warm phase for the moment at least. Thus, I think we'll be hard-pressed to find ourselves in the +AO regime through February, it simply hasn't happened when both the ENSO & AMO indices were positive and the warm water currently off Atlantic Canada is lending a huge clue to the ultimate fate of the AO in February... (i.e. the warmer waters are more akin to the El Ninos that observed the NAM flip in Feb, despite remaining predominantly positive in December & January)

IRdjsp0raH.png

 

BTW, I am very pleased w/ how well my monthly El Nino temperature composites are verifying thus far this month, virtually spot on w/ what one would anticipate in Warm Neutral-Weak El Nino state...

ncep_cfsr_noram_t2m_anom.png

 

 

US-Winter-Monthly-Temps-DJF-El-Nino-Plac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro showed a long drawn out period of precip a few days back before there was clarity on how the energy would eject. It's certainly possible to have an additional piece in between the 2 more prominent waves. It won't be organized or significant but nobody would complain about a sneaky dusting to an inch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...