Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

Christmas Grinch Storm Potential


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts


MID-LEVEL SHORTWAVES PASSING THROUGH SRN BRITISH COLUMBIA TODAY

DOWNSTREAM SURFACE LOW DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE LOWER MISS VALLEY

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PREFERENCE: 00Z ECMWF/UKMET

CONFIDENCE: BELOW AVERAGE

GIVEN THE CONNECTION TO WHAT HAPPENS ACROSS THE DAKOTAS WITH A

CLOSED LOW REFERENCED IN THE ABOVE SECTION...IT APPEARS THIS NEXT

WAVE FOLLOWS SUIT...WITH THE 00Z GFS MORE AMPLIFIED WITH SHORTWAVE

ENERGY DIVING SWD TOWARD TEXAS...WHILE THE 12Z ECMWF IS ON THE

WEAKER SIDE...AND THE 12Z CMC IS MORE FRAGMENTED WITH THE

SHORTWAVE ENERGY DIVING EAST OF A LARGE E-PAC RIDGE. IT APPEARS

THE 00Z GFSP IS A PREFERRED BLEND BETWEEN THE 12Z ECMWF / 00Z GFS.

THE NEW 00Z ECMWF/UKMET HAVE ADJUSTED TOWARD THE PREVIOUS

PREFERENCE...WITH MORE AMPLIFICATION AS THE SHORTWAVE DIVES DOWN

ACROSS THE ROCKIES...AND HAS SIMILARITIES TO THE GFSP. ALTHOUGH NO

SINGLE MODEL SHOWS A PREFERRED EVOLUTION AT THIS TIME...THE 00Z

ECMWF/UKMET/GFSP FORM A REASONABLE COMPROMISE FOR NOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 982
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Board is comical at times. Thank Goodness there is always a pragmatic version to assess the situation:

HOWEVER...GIVEN THIS

SYSTEM IS STILL 3.5 TO 4 DAYS AWAY...I AM HESITANT TO MAKE ANY

MAJOR CHANGES TO THE GOING FORECAST FOR THIS PERIOD...AS IT

APPEARS THE LATEST DETERMINISTIC MODEL SOLUTIONS ARE REALLY JUST

SHOWING US THE INHERENT HIGH AMOUNT OF CHAOS IN THE SYSTEM WITH

SUCH A RAPIDLY CHANGING PATTERN. AS SUCH...I REALLY HAVE NO

CONFIDENCE IN ANY OF THE LATEST 00 UTC DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE AND

WOULD PREFER TO SEE ADDITIONAL RUNS OVER THE NEXT DAY OR TWO SHOW

SIMILAR TRENDS BEFORE BEGINNING TO MAKING ANY BIG CHANGES. -LOT AFD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS APX (Gaylord) put out an excellent AFD this morning

 

 

 

.LONG TERM...(TUESDAY NIGHT THROUGH SATURDAY)
ISSUED AT 413 PM EST SAT DEC 20 2014

PART 2 OF OUR STORM: WILL SANTA DELIVER FOR THE SNOW LOVERS NEAR
CHRISTMAS...OR WILL THE GRINCH WIN OUT THIS YEAR? THAT IS THE
MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION AS WE HEAD INTO MIDWEEK...WITH 00Z GUIDANCE
SUITE CONTINUING TO OFFER AN EVEN LARGER PLETHORA OF SOLUTIONS AS TO
JUST HOW THIS WILL ALL UNFOLD. THE KEY TO THIS PERIOD REMAINS THE
TRUE STRONG JET CORE AND EMBEDDED STRONG SHORTWAVE ENERGY ALREADY
WELL EVIDENT OVER THE SOUTHERN GULF OF ALASKA. THIS ENERGY WILL PLOW
ASHORE IN THE STRONG PACIFIC "FIRE HOSE" PATTERN...DIVING THROUGH
THE CENTRAL CONUS TROUGH AND HELPING FURTHER AMPLIFY THE UPPER
PATTERN ON THE HEELS OF 150+ KNOTS OF UPPER JET HELP DIVING TOWARD
NORTHERN MEXICO. HATE TO TRY TO ESTABLISH ANY TRENDS EVEN AT THIS
JUNCTURE...BUT MY GUT FEELING BASED ON HISTORY AND GUIDANCE TRENDS
IS THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT A STRONGLY DIGGING SYSTEM...SUFFICIENT TO
SLOW THINGS DOWN QUITE A BIT AS WE PUSH TOWARD CHRISTMAS.

THE SHEER AMOUNT OF JET ENERGY STRONGLY ARGUES IN THAT DIRECTION AS
DOES HISTORY OF SUCH SETUPS... WITH MANY ANALOGS (THOUGH STILL NO
BIG MATCHES) SUGGESTING SHORTWAVE ENERGY CROSSING AS FAR SOUTH AS
THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO BEFORE WRAPPING INTO THE EXISTING MID-
CONUS UPPER TROUGH. THAT SETUP ALONE HAS TO GIVE ONE PAUSE AS IT AT
LEAST OPENS THE DOOR FOR RAPIDLY DEEPENING CYCLOGENESIS SOMEWHERE
NEAR THE GULF...LIFTING NORTH AND EITHER WRAPPING BACK BENEATH THE
PRIMARY MID LEVEL CYCLONE...OR BEING SLING-SHOTTED NORTHWARD QUICKLY
INTO CANADA. AND THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS A SLIGHT CHANGE IN TIMING!!
SHOULD THE UPPER WAVE (YET TO BE WELL MODELED ON THE UPPER AIR
NETWORK I MIGHT ADD) SLOW DOWN AND DIG BY JUST 6-12 MORE HOURS...
THIS WHOLE BOMBOGENESIS THING MAY BE AWASH...AS HAS BEEN HINTED AT
BY A NUMBER OF GEFS/EPS/NAEFS MEMBERS OVER THE PAST FEW DAYS...
THOUGH OF COURSE MANY OPERATIONAL RUNS STILL SHOW QUITE THE SLEW OF
DIFFERING OPINIONS...INCLUDING THE EURO CAVING WITH ITS CONTINUITY
RECENTLY. IN ALL HONESTY...THIS REMAINS A VERY FLUID SITUATION...
WITH CHANGES STILL TO BE EXPECTED. HOWEVER...CONFIDENCE IS BEGINNING
TO INCREASE THAT THIS SYSTEM AT LEAST HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE A BIT
OF A DUD ACROSS THE GREAT LAKES.

WITH ALL OF THAT SAID...REALLY NOT SURE HOW TO PLAY THE TUESDAY
NIGHT/WEDNESDAY PORTION OF THE FORECAST...OR EVEN INTO CHRISTMAS DAY
FOR THAT MATTER...WITH A WHOLE SMORGASBORD OF POSSIBILITIES.
AGAIN...GUT FEELING HAS TO KICK IN SOMEWHERE...AND SUSPECT THAT THE
NORTHERN STREAM WAVE INITIALLY WILL BE IN THE STRONGER CAMP OF
POSSIBILITIES...OPENING THE DOOR THAT OUR SECONDARY WAVE MAY WELL
END UP FARTHER EAST. CURRENT FORECAST HAS CATEGORICAL POPS GOING FOR
THOSE PERIODS...AND EVEN IF WE SEE AN EASTERLY SOLUTION VERIFY...
HAVE TO BELIEVE THERE WILL BE PERIODS OF RAIN ROTATING BACK INTO THE
AREA BENEATH THE INITIAL UPPER TROUGH AS IT MEANDERS TOWARD THE
GREAT LAKES. SHOULD ENOUGH COLD AIR BLEED INTO THE DEVELOPING SYSTEM
OFF TO OUR WEST...CAN SEE A TRANSITION FROM WEST TO EAST TO SOME
SNOW INTO WEDNESDAY EVENING...BUT WITH LIMITED WRAPAROUND PRECIP FOR
CHRISTMAS MORNING AS THE FASTER DEPARTURE OF OUR SYSTEM THINS
MOISTURE QUICKLY. STILL WORTH AT LEAST A CHANCE MENTION...BUT WINDS
MAY NOT TURN OUT ALL THAT BAD WITH AN EASTWARD TREND EITHER...AS THE
TIGHTER GRADIENT ENDS UP IN ONTARIO OR QUEBEC. THIS WHOLE FORECAST
IS REALLY JUST A MESS...WITH ADDITIONAL CHANGES LIKELY OVER THE NEXT
48 HOURS...INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY THAT PRECIP CHANCES MAY BE
YANKED ALTOGETHER INTO MIDWEEK IF MORE EASTERLY SOLUTIONS COME TO
FRUITION.

REGARDLESS OF HOW THIS WHOLE CHRISTMAS STORM THING SHAKES OUT...ONE
THING LOOKS MORE CERTAIN. ANY COLD ADVECTION IN ITS WAKE WILL BE
LIMITED AS THE REALLY COLD AIR BUILDS INTO WEST-CENTRAL CANADA AND
OUR FLOW STAYS PROGRESS. THAT MAY OPEN THE DOOR TO ANOTHER SYSTEM
EMERGING FROM THE SOUTHERN PLAINS INTO NEXT WEEKEND...BUT WITH
ANOTHER HUGE RANGE OF SOLUTIONS MODELED AT THIS POINT...ALL THE WAY
FROM ANOTHER RAIN MAKER HERE TO A SIGNIFICANT SNOW STORM. DON`T WANT
TO EVEN HAZARD A TRUE GUESS JUST YET ABOUT THAT ONE...BUT AM
BECOMING INCREASINGLY CONVINCED THAT A MORE DRAMATIC PATTERN CHANGE
WILL TAKE SHAPE BEYOND THE CURRENT FORECAST PERIOD. AS SUCH...SNOW
LOVERS - DON`T LOSE HOPE JUST YET.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Board is comical at times. Thank Goodness there is always a pragmatic version to assess the situation:

HOWEVER...GIVEN THIS

SYSTEM IS STILL 3.5 TO 4 DAYS AWAY...I AM HESITANT TO MAKE ANY

MAJOR CHANGES TO THE GOING FORECAST FOR THIS PERIOD...AS IT

APPEARS THE LATEST DETERMINISTIC MODEL SOLUTIONS ARE REALLY JUST

SHOWING US THE INHERENT HIGH AMOUNT OF CHAOS IN THE SYSTEM WITH

SUCH A RAPIDLY CHANGING PATTERN. AS SUCH...I REALLY HAVE NO

CONFIDENCE IN ANY OF THE LATEST 00 UTC DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE AND

WOULD PREFER TO SEE ADDITIONAL RUNS OVER THE NEXT DAY OR TWO SHOW

SIMILAR TRENDS BEFORE BEGINNING TO MAKING ANY BIG CHANGES. -LOT AFD

This is wrong. The universal loss of the storm by all members of the 00z suite is not a measure of high chaos inherent in the system. He's thinking of model SPREAD, which there is relatively little of at this point. This forecaster is probably just trying to hang on for another model run or two and hope he doesn't have to back off the forecast.

Yes, the storm could reappear in all the models, but don't hold your breath. Model consensus with decreasing lead time and improving sampling is reason for increased certainty, not decreased. Sampling was not great last night, but like I said, the Seattle raob nabbed the lead edge of the PV anomaly. That may have been enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is wrong. The universal loss of the storm by all members of the 00z suite is not a measure of high chaos inherent in the system. He's thinking of model SPREAD, which there is relatively little of at this point. This forecaster is probably just trying to hang on for another model run or two and hope he doesn't have to back off the forecast.

Yes, the storm could reappear in all the models, but don't hold your breath. Model consensus with decreasing lead time and improving sampling is reason for increased certainty, not decreased. Sampling was not great last night, but like I said, the Seattle raob nabbed the lead edge of the PV anomaly. That may have been enough.

Perhaps. My point really wasn't about the meteorology rather the constant model worship that causes SOME to live and die with each run. Is it fair to say when a significantl pattern change is taking place model variability is enhanced? For that matter I've seen instances where it is the second wave in the train that ultimately is the big kahuna versus the initial one the models latched on to. Either way, continues to be fun to track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. My point really wasn't about the meteorology rather the constant model worship that causes SOME to live and die with each run. Is it fair to say when a significantl pattern change is taking place model variability is enhanced? For that matter I've seen instances where it is the second wave in the train that ultimately is the big kahuna versus the initial one the models latched on to. Either way, continues to be fun to track.

Unfortunately, this wont be changing anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since none of us knows the true outcome of this event, until more comes in line with one of the GFS models, not sure if we can put too much stock in either yet, even if the PGFS has the potential to be a better model with its higher resolution. We were speculating about a farther west track yesterday but given lack of run to run continuity, could just be noise still. Also that's quite the hard left track portrayed. Negative tilt to the trough makes it more reasonable but would like to see more support for a due north track on the rest of the 12z suite. The position of the sfc low at hr 60 and 66 typically portends a good track for snow in Chicago and points west.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low passes over Rockford and Milwaukee, with Hawkeye getting hammered on the PGFS.  It'll be interesting to see if the other models pick up on a stronger/more northwest solution now that the sampling is becoming more complete. 

 

 

12/1/2006 was one of the CIPS analogs as of yesterday.  I cringed when I saw it but I'm sure you'd be fine with an outcome like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha, yeah that'd be okay with me.  Even back in '06 I don't think we had this much model disagreement. 

 

 

NAM was the first model to suggest a northwest track.  I clearly remember a GFS run about 60-72 hours out that didn't have much of anything.  Other than that, it's kinda tough to remember what each model did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...