Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Ending out December with a Potential Pattern Change


CoastalWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Euro ensembles look marginalv at best for 21st and are a total Grinch storm for most of new england with the Christmas storm.

Looks like trash for anyone who likes snow in SNE

 

Does most of New England include the ski resorts? I know the Whites can do pretty well with inland runners if there's enough CAD... or is this a case of rain to the border??? I know it's going to change, but curious of how much at risk Xmas week skiing is... Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whether its two days or 10 days out doesn't matter the majority of the modeling is showing a storm track to the west of New England .You like to nit pick my comments it's kind of annoying. obviously there's plenty of time for things to change

 

I didn't notice that I was singling you out, so you probably just think I'm annoying.

 

Anyway, of course it matters whether it is two or ten days out, what a ridiculous comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't think the 21st looked bad for a 3-6 type advisory event.

  

When the snow maps show zilch it doesn't look good. Neither the euro nor the ensembles of the ecmwf show an ad isory event south of ORH

Thats exactky what it is just away from that ocean

 

Away from the ocean and NW of Boston by 40+ miles.

 

You're all snow verbatim. Not sure what you mean . The Xmas storm is 9 days away and trending colder. Anything is on table

He's not all snow nor are you by the euro solutions today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't notice that I was singling you out, so you probably just think I'm annoying.

Anyway, of course it matters whether it is two or ten days out, what a ridiculous comment.

its not a ridiculous statement at all, whether its 2 days out or 10 days out the computers are showing what they are showing I'm simply interpreting the data and saying that the majority of them are showing a track west of New England. obviously the margin for error is much greater in the 10 day time period I'm simply saying what the models are showing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not a ridiculous statement at all, whether its 2 days out or 10 days out the computers are showing what they are showing I'm simply interpreting the data and saying that the majority of them are showing a track west of New England. obviously the margin for error is much greater in the 10 day time period I'm simply saying what the models are showing

 

I don't have access to the ECENS, so maybe I am missing something, but I wouldn't call what I have access to a consensus other than the fact that there is a storm of some sort.

 

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_eus_36_zps1a5cee18.png

 

gem-ememb_lowlocs_eus_36_zpsedeae604.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...