Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Northern Ohio Obs/Discussion Part 2


Trent
 Share

Recommended Posts

So far it looks like NW PA and SW NY have struggled to change over to snow in the higher terrain, although I think it's very close. In SW NY, most stations under the band are in the 30s, with several at 35 or cooler, which given heavy precip rates is probably resulting in snow falling. In Erie County most stations are in the upper 30s/lower 40s, however a couple of stations under a heavier band in the NE corner of the county are down to 34-35. The band is really starting to crank now with some 40-50dBZ echoes out over the lake and some lightning showing up south of Buffalo, near Erie and also in the squalls over the western part of the lake. Some deeper synoptic moisture is starting to rotate south over the lake and 850mb temps should cool a tad more over the next few hours, so if the band is going to dynamically cool the column in NW PA and SW NY enough for a change to snow it will do it reasonably soon. BUF has added some accums to the higher terrain downwind of the lake this afternoon, but CLE still ( :rolleyes:) has all rain for everyone till this evening. Given over 1000 J/KG of lake induced CAPE, deep ambient moisture and strong convergence, I'd have to imagine this band will be capable of producing precip rates of a quarter inch per hour or more...so if a change to snow does occur, I still think my idea of a "surprise" advisory or warning event in the higher terrain in NW PA and SW NY is on the table. 

 

For NE Ohio, the trough swings through around rush hour and brings the winds around. Instability and moisture are still plenty favorable for decent precip rates at this point, although the temps around 700mb may warm just enough to prevent much if any lightning from occurring with any lake effect precip this evening. Surface temps have warmed into the mid 40s, but temps aloft are plenty cold enough and dew points are near 30, so any half decent squalls should still produce wind swept graupel or wet snow. In fact a station along the lake in NE Ashtabula County just dropped into the 30s under the heavier band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUF just went with an advisory for SW NY and CLE probably should do the same for NW PA. Probably too warm for much more than heavy snow or graupel showers in NE OH that maybe drop a quick coating but not more.

Edit: although let's see how cool eastern Cuyahoga and Geauga can get over the next hour with all that moisture still over the lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS and Euro have really trended cooler for this upcoming weekend and have a WNWish wind...so I'd have to think if the idea holds that the first plowable LES could be on the table in about a week.

As for Thanksgiving week when I'll be in town, the idea seems to be for a second, possibly larger surge of cold somewhere later in the week. Whether or not this second dump of cold comes in far enough east to give us another shot of LES later in the week is debatable, but that's a long ways off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models seem to be continuing to come into agreement on a cold enough airmass for the first decent LES of the season this weekend. There's still some time to change, but if the general idea holds for another day I'd become pretty confident in the cold happening.

 

Just for kicks, since this is the first GFS run that really agreed with the Euro on the amount of cold for this weekend, the 12z run looked decent in BUFKIT. Not great, but decent. Plenty of instability and enough moisture with W to WNW winds. The window for this possible weekend event wouldn't be tremendous, possibly not even more than 24 hours, but there could be enough to work with to get a warning criteria event in the primary Snowbelt especially given a W to WNW event favoring a single band.

 

Later on during the week of Thanksgiving there's still a lot of uncertainty. The ensembles have been consistently hinting at a second shot of cold possibly around Thanksgiving or Black Friday and then perhaps a third shot later that weekend...but aren't agreeing on where each shot of cold dumps in the US which has large implications for us. It's possible one or both of those shots dumps in well to our west, which would quite possibly limit how much LES we'd get once that cold eventually sloshed east.

 

But, we could have something to track in the fairly near future...I'm personally more curious in what happens Thanksgiving week just because I'll be up there, but this weekend could bring something half decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models seem to be continuing to come into agreement on a cold enough airmass for the first decent LES of the season this weekend. There's still some time to change, but if the general idea holds for another day I'd become pretty confident in the cold happening.

 

Just for kicks, since this is the first GFS run that really agreed with the Euro on the amount of cold for this weekend, the 12z run looked decent in BUFKIT. Not great, but decent. Plenty of instability and enough moisture with W to WNW winds. The window for this possible weekend event wouldn't be tremendous, possibly not even more than 24 hours, but there could be enough to work with to get a warning criteria event in the primary Snowbelt especially given a W to WNW event favoring a single band.

 

Later on during the week of Thanksgiving there's still a lot of uncertainty. The ensembles have been consistently hinting at a second shot of cold possibly around Thanksgiving or Black Friday and then perhaps a third shot later that weekend...but aren't agreeing on where each shot of cold dumps in the US which has large implications for us. It's possible one or both of those shots dumps in well to our west, which would quite possibly limit how much LES we'd get once that cold eventually sloshed east.

 

But, we could have something to track in the fairly near future...I'm personally more curious in what happens Thanksgiving week just because I'll be up there, but this weekend could bring something half decent.

 

Thanks for the update. Yeah, this weekend has potential. The duration does seem short but as you mentioned... a favorable WNW flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read the thread for this time last year when we had our first les event. Almost forgot just how impressive that was with 16" here and many locations above 10". Then several additional snows that week and the 3" per hr band around Thanksgiving. Impressive stretch!

Going for a repeat this year, just 10 days later :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha that would be nice!

How is the le looking this weekend? Noticed cle put snow in the fc for sat night and sun.

The GFS remains consistent in its idea of about an 18 hour window for very good lake effect with a W to WNW wind...the 12z Canadian looks similar to the GFS in terms of lake effect. The Euro has the low that tracks to our north winding up more to our northwest on Saturday which delays the cold some and results in a shorter window.

 

At this point I'm pretty confident in accumulating lake effect, but not confident on amounts. Something like the GFS or Canadian would be a significant event, likely featuring a single convergence band into the primary Snowbelt with heavy snows for a good 18 hours...the GFS has about an 18 hour window from late Saturday evening through much of Sunday afternoon with extreme instability (near or above 1000 J/KG of lake induced CAPE) and good moisture, with well aligned winds at west or WNW...I'd be shocked not to see totals pushing a foot in such a scenario. On the other-hand, the Euro would be much more pedestrian (but still likely accumulating LES).

 

With a W or WNW wind this looks like a primary Snowbelt event...Lake, northern Geauga and Ashtabula Counties east into NW PA. The areas that could also do well depending on exactly how much of a northerly component the winds have would be NE Cuyahoga and the rest of Geauga.

 

Still lots of details to work out (and lots of time for change)...so I'm trying to temper my expectations (especially since the Euro hasn't been consistent on a good event)...but a GFS and Canadian scenario would be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS remains consistent in its idea of about an 18 hour window for very good lake effect with a W to WNW wind...the 12z Canadian looks similar to the GFS in terms of lake effect. The Euro has the low that tracks to our north winding up more to our northwest on Saturday which delays the cold some and results in a shorter window.

 

At this point I'm pretty confident in accumulating lake effect, but not confident on amounts. Something like the GFS or Canadian would be a significant event, likely featuring a single convergence band into the primary Snowbelt with heavy snows for a good 18 hours...the GFS has about an 18 hour window from late Saturday evening through much of Sunday afternoon with extreme instability (near or above 1000 J/KG of lake induced CAPE) and good moisture, with well aligned winds at west or WNW...I'd be shocked not to see totals pushing a foot in such a scenario. On the other-hand, the Euro would be much more pedestrian (but still likely accumulating LES).

 

With a W or WNW wind this looks like a primary Snowbelt event...Lake, northern Geauga and Ashtabula Counties east into NW PA. The areas that could also do well depending on exactly how much of a northerly component the winds have would be NE Cuyahoga and the rest of Geauga.

 

Still lots of details to work out (and lots of time for change)...so I'm trying to temper my expectations (especially since the Euro hasn't been consistent on a good event)...but a GFS and Canadian scenario would be fun.

 

Thanks for the update. Yeah, the euro isn't near as much fun as the gfs. Although, we may a bit too far south for this event if current wind trajectories were to hold. Hopefully we'll see bit more of NW'erly direction. A few degrees change will make a huge difference. 280 - 290 would be an ideal single band scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Lake Erie is just getting warmer ...

 

RECORD EVENT REPORT

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CLEVELAND OH
602 PM EST WED NOV 18 2015

...RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURES TIED AT CLEVELAND AND AKRON TODAY...

TODAY AT 511 PM EST THE TEMPERATURE CLIMBED TO 71 DEGREES AT
CLEVELAND HOPKINS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. THIS TIES THE OLD RECORD
SET IN 1954.

TODAY AT 359 PM EST THE TEMPERATURE CLIMBED TO 70 DEGREES AT THE
AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL AIRPORT. THIS TIES THE OLD RECORD SET IN 1958.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CLE seems to be anticipating a WSW flow based on the areas they are highlighting.

THIS COULD BE THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT LAKE ENHANCED EVENT OF THE SEASON WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF 6 OR MORE INCHES OF ACCUMULATION SOMEWHERE IN THE

SNOWBELT...MOSTLY LIKELY IN NW PA AND ASHTABULA CO.

Although I do share your concerns that you and dta may be too far south by a little bit, it should get into Lake and northern Geauga at the least...it does look like every model gets wind around to at least west (at least to me lol)

It looks like they put the mention in their HWO as far west as Cuyahoga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I do share your concerns that you and dta may be too far south by a little bit, it should get into Lake and northern Geauga at the least...it does look like every model gets wind around to at least west (at least to me lol)

It looks like they put the mention in their HWO as far west as Cuyahoga

 

My guess is that we'll see a 270 flow... the 322 corridor on east has been the hot spot the past few years it seems. If the storm takes a more easterly path vs. cutting hard to the NNE would that be a better scenario for WNW winds behind the storm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that we'll see a 270 flow... the 322 corridor on east has been the hot spot the past few years it seems. If the storm takes a more easterly path vs. cutting hard to the NNE would that be a better scenario for WNW winds behind the storm?

That's sort of what I'm thinking for a preliminary jackpot zone..:and id agree that a storm moving more E as opposed to cutting would allow the winds to have a more northerly component. I'm going to try to have a more substantial post tonight but it will probably be pretty late.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE TIME HAS COME! For the first time this fall, we are looking at the potential for a decent lake effect snow event in Northeastern Ohio late Saturday night through Sunday night.

 

gfs-60-850.gif?w=640&h=480

 

A fairly potent low pressure will track northeast across Lake Erie Saturday evening and push a strong cold front across Lake Erie. Behind this front, the coldest airmass of the season thus far will move into Northeastern Ohio on a west to at times west-northwest wind. This system will drop moderate to heavy snow across Iowa, southern Wisconsin, northern Illinois, Michigan, far northern Indiana and perhaps extreme northwestern Ohio. Very little synoptic snow from this system will fall in Ohio outside of far NW Ohio, where perhaps a few inches may fall Saturday into Saturday evening.

 

gfs-51-925.gif?w=640&h=480

 

925mb temperatures will fall below freezing quickly by mid to late Saturday evening across N OH, signaling any remaining precipitation changing to snow. The deformation zone will miss NE OH well to the northwest Saturday night due to the low track being to our northwest, so any synoptic snow showers will not add up to much.

 

The attention will then turn to Lake Erie later Saturday night as instability increases off the lake and winds become better aligned out of the west.

 

bufkit-1.png?w=640&h=448

 

The GFS and NAM (NAM shown above) both bring the winds around to westerly with moderate lake induced instability, moisture to about 8k feet and high inversion heights by 6z Sunday. This should allow some lake response to begin late Saturday night. With a mainly west wind, you’d expect the best snow to occur over Lake, Geauga and Ashtabula Counties in NE Ohio into NW PA, with northern Cuyahoga County (especially northeastern) possibly getting grazed. The question at this point is how strong is convergence over the Snowbelt, and is any upstream lake moisture involved?

 

bufkit-2.png?w=640&h=449

 

The NAM and GFS both briefly get winds to a little more WNW for a few hours Sunday morning, before ridging starts building in and the winds starts slowly turning more W and then eventually SW.

 

bufkit-3.png

 

The GFS has a similar, brief backing of the winds to a slightly more WNW direction early Saturday, so this is actually pretty good agreement among the two American models at least. Both models have extreme lake induced instability (lake to 850mb temp differentials of 20-22C, lake to 700mb temp differentials of 30-32C, lake to 500mb differentials of near 40C, and 750-1000 J/KG of lake induced CAPE, to go with inversions remaining near 10-15k feet), moisture to at least 7-8k feet, and fairly negligible low level wind shear. This would seemingly support any bands producing heavy snows.

 

nam-72-sfc.gif?w=640&h=480

 

As winds start backing Sunday afternoon thanks to ridging building in, convergence should remain strong/possibly strengthen across the northern primary Snowbelt, but banding will also start slowly shifting up the lakeshore. Inversion heights and moisture depth really start diminishing Sunday evening after remaining decent to favorable through Sunday afternoon, and by midnight Sunday night any lake effect should be light to moderate and confined to perhaps northern Ashtabula County and Erie County PA as winds continue to back as ridging pushes in.

 

bufkit-4.png?w=640&h=448

 

The NAM maintains decent lake effect conditions at Erie until midnight Sunday night, before ridging pushes the winds completely offshore, inversions crash and moisture goes away. This should cause an end to the lake effect in NE Ohio by midnight Sunday night.

 

In general, the ingredients appear to be there for heavy lake effect snow:

 

-Instability is moderate to extreme late Saturday evening through Sunday evening

-Moisture depth is between 7-10k feet through Sunday afternoon

-Wind shear is fairly weak

-Steep lapse rates and high RH through the snow growth zone much of the event

-Long fetch

 

The big questions are when does convergence flare up and help support a strong, single band, exactly where does the band setup, does the band move much, and how will Lake Michigan moisture possibly influence lake effect off of Lake Erie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nam-4-57.gif

 

With winds trying to turn more WNW early Sunday, that tends to strengthen convergence near the lakeshore…especially when surface pressures over land are trying to rise and push winds more offshore. The 0z hi-res NAM shows convergence starting to develop over the Snowbelt by 4am Sunday, and shows it persisting until the end of the run at 7am Sunday.

 

gfs-60-wind.png?w=640&h=480

 

The 0z GFS also has pretty strong convergence across the Snowbelt Sunday morning, but actually weakens it for a few hours Sunday afternoon. I can’t get a good zoomed in version of the lower res NAM right now, but it appears to do something similar. The GFS and NAM then both flare up convergence late Sunday into Sunday evening as ridging really starts nosing in, before any banding would then shift offshore:

 

gfs-72-10m.png?w=640&h=480

 

I’m not sure what causes this possible brief weakening of the convergence Sunday afternoon. The NAM appears to hint at potentially a very, very subtle trough moving by, possibly disrupting the wind fields? Either way, as we head towards evening, convergence should really increase as temps on land plummet and surface pressure continue to rise from the south. If there is indeed a small trough that passes early Sunday afternoon, which would argue for decent activity Sunday morning, as heavy lake effect often occurs just before a trough passes.

 

With pretty good evidence for decent convergence Sunday morning for several hours, I’d have to imagine a fairly well defined convergence band will form. With winds over the lake fairly strong and out of the WNW, this convergence and any associated band would likely settle inland a little bit into southern Lake, a good portion of Geauga and central and southern Ashtabula Counties. With a WNW wind, there is some risk of any band settling into northern Cuyahoga and perhaps even northeastern Lorain County too. If convergence weakens as shown on the models Sunday afternoon, any band could become disorganized for a few hours…although with well aligned winds, good shear, orographic lift in the higher terrain of the primary Snowbelt and still some frictional convergence, I can’t picture the snow completely stopping. I’d then expect the snow to redevelop Sunday evening as ridging really builds in and convergence increases again, although by this point the band would likely occur farther northeast than Sunday morning and slowly be shifting farther northeast as time went on.

 

nam-winds.png?w=640&h=480

 

As for how steady any banding would be, the NAM doesn’t show winds moving much late Saturday night into Sunday morning. There are some fluctuations, but no large shifts until Sunday afternoon when the winds start backing towards the southwest. With any banding Sunday morning driven by convergence caused largely by the lakeshore, and winds not moving a ton, it’s quite possible that any band late Saturday night into Sunday morning is fairly steady for several hours, before convergence possibly weakens for a time Sunday afternoon. By Sunday evening the winds will be shifting, so any band that redevelops along the eastern lakeshore may only stay over any given spot for a couple of hours.

nam-4-57-radar.gif?w=640&h=512

As for potential Lake Michigan moisture, the models are trying to signal a significant band developing over Lake Michigan Saturday night on a NNW wind behind the surface low, with the band possibly swinging east late Saturday night into Sunday morning as the low pulls northeast and the winds go more westerly off of Lake Michigan. The models are trying to hint at pretty good convergence with this band, with colder air trying to work in from the southwest. This could give a few hours of good Lake Michigan pre-seeding late Saturday night into Sunday morning. By Sunday evening the winds may be too southerly to get good Lake Michigan moisture to Lake Erie.

 

So, with all of this said, let’s try to figure out how things will play out and how heavy amounts may be:

 

I think there’s a good chance a good W-E convergence band develops after midnight Saturday night into mainly the primary Snowbelt…initially Lake, northern Geauga and Ashtabula Counties. The band should settle south some early Sunday morning as there seems to be good agreement on the winds going WNW in this timeframe. This should push the band into a good portion of Geauga County and southern Asthabula County, with northern Lake and Ashtabula Counties possibly seeing a lessening of snow at this time. With a WNW flow over the lake, if it actually occurs as currently modelled, convergence would likely increase enough along the central lakeshore for some banding into northern Cuyahoga and perhaps northeastern Lorain County Sunday morning for a few hours…with the best potential for decent snows on the east side, although not impossible for some accumulations on the west side. There seems to be support for convergence weakening for a few hours Sunday afternoon, possibly due to a weak trough moving through and altering the wind fields, which may disrupt the band some. However, there should still be enough support for at least snow showers continuing. Winds do start backing slowly Sunday afternoon so the snow should end during the afternoon in Lorain and much of Cuyahoga County, and shift north some in Geauga County. By Sunday evening, rapidly falling temps overland and high pressure continuing to nose in should cause convergence to increase again…probably across Lake and northern Ashtabula Counties…likely causing any banding to reflare. The banding should slowly shift northeast up the shoreline and be out of Ohio around midnight or so Sunday night.

 

With extreme instability, decent moisture, high inversion heights, fairly low wind shear and the potential for Lake Michigan moisture helping things late Saturday night into Sunday morning, snowfall rates of 1-2” per hour seem possible under any banding. If banding becomes slow moving for several hours as I expect, snowfall totals would quickly approach half a foot in the favored areas and could exceed it. With 850mb temps cooling below -10C by Sunday morning with 925mb temps of -5C through the event, any decent snow band will produce accumulations down to the lakeshore…and in the lower elevations of Cuyahoga and Lorain Counties…although, warmer surface temps near or slightly above freezing near the immediate shoreline could cause lower snow ratios and hence somewhat slower accumulations near the immediate lakeshore under any banding. If banding becomes more disorganized for a period Sunday afternoon as seems possible, snow accumulations would obviously slow considerably. By Sunday evening moisture and inversions do fall some, so snow rates may not exceed 1” per hour consistently in any re-flareup as it looks now.

 

I’m not extremely confident in throwing out hard accumulation numbers yet…although I will certainly do so Friday evening at some point…however, I suspect that locations that get under the good band Sunday morning…assuming it forms…would likely be the jackpot. At this point I think this occurs in far southern Lake, the northern half of Geauga and central Ashtabula Counties. Moderate accumulations could occur in parts of eastern Cuyahoga County and also along the lakeshore where banding may not be as consistent during the heaviest part of the event. I do think there’s opportunity for prolonged enough banding with good rates to see totals of at least 6” wherever the jackpot zone occurs…with a decently large area seeing at least 3”.

 

Potential caveats are the Euro is weaker with the surface low than the GFS/NAM/Canadian/UK and has a shorter window of good lake effect. The Euro did trend some towards the more amped camp this run. The GFS has remained extremely consistent with its solution. This gives me decent confidence the event plays out similar to what the GFS would imply, but it’s not 100% confidence yet.

 

With that said, here’s my general thinking…I’ll put hard numbers on this Friday evening.

 

11-22-no-neo.png?w=640&h=366

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great analysis OHweather! If I remember correctly, the last Nov lake effect started out primarily northern areas too. Either way, I'll be glad to see the first accumulation. Cle going with 1-3 sat night and 1-3 Sunday.

Does anybody have the link to the Cle snowfall maps? My link is broken for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great analysis OHweather! If I remember correctly, the last Nov lake effect started out primarily northern areas too. Either way, I'll be glad to see the first accumulation. Cle going with 1-3 sat night and 1-3 Sunday.

Does anybody have the link to the Cle snowfall maps? My link is broken for some reason.

 

http://www.weather.gov/cle/Winter_Weather

 

Doesn't appear they have a map out yet. I would think tonight or tomorrow morning they'd release one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great analysis OHweather! If I remember correctly, the last Nov lake effect started out primarily northern areas too. Either way, I'll be glad to see the first accumulation. Cle going with 1-3 sat night and 1-3 Sunday.

Does anybody have the link to the Cle snowfall maps? My link is broken for some reason.

 

It will be nice to see the snow again. Not feeling this one though... winds only turn WNW'erly for a brief time which would allow the band to sink south into this area. If the ridge builds in slower than expected I could see some decent accum's out this way. It will be interesting to see where the bands set-up. 322 on North is a great spot to be.

 

OHWeather's snowfall map looks spot-on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The weaker low (Euro beats EVERY other model again) does a couple things:

-More WNW winds yes

-Cyclonic flow doesn't stick around as long

-Moisture diminishes quicker.

I didn't get around to making a final map tonight, but am thinking I'll shift the snow a little farther southwest but not going with widespread 6"+ amounts...my thinking is 3-6" should cover it for the "jackpot zone" in NE Ohio...but I'll look again in the morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2ZvEVp.png

 

I *finally* got around to putting numbers on my map and tweaking things.

 

Unfortunately, I definitely had to lower amounts from my initial thinking. The models all converged on a solution that was weaker with the storm, which allowed drier air to move in quicker. Of course, the Euro showed this solution two days ago, and I wrote it off since seemingly every other model disagreed with it. I've found that when I disagree with the Euro it usually pulls off the coupe, so maybe I should stop doing that.

 

The winds will be WNW late tonight into Sunday morning, and moisture looks pretty good through tonight, so I do think that there's an initial burst late tonight into Sunday morning. Instability will be extreme by this point too. It still looks like things may get disrupted for a few hours Sunday afternoon as a little wind shift moves through, but we should see another increase Sunday evening as ridging over land causes convergence to increase over the Snowbelt.

 

As for amounts, instability is still going to be extreme and although moisture actually looks pretty marginal now, we do still have a long fetch working for us and the potential for some convergence over the Snowbelt to try to help focus things. Winds do look to go to a more true WNW direction which should try to push things into northern Lorain and Cuyahoga Counties, so I kept the idea of light accumulations there. The window for that looks to be a few hours long late tonight into Sunday morning, and with more questionable moisture I decided to only go with 1-2" there. We've seen bands in this area surprise with a WNW flow before, so I suppose it's not impossible someone gets 3 or 4" in northern Cuyahoga County (outside of the far east side where I have it drawn in), but it's not likely. I overall decided not to shift the area of heavier amounts much farther south in the heart of the Snowbelt compared to my first guess. There will be a pretty strong lake-land temp differential, which should create a pretty decent lake aggregate trough and tend to try to keep snow a little closer to the lake. With two potential windows for banding along with extreme instability and a long fetch, I still think a few or several inches could fall, but think amounts should stay under 6". Confined the heaviest accumulations to the higher terrain.

 

Hopefully we get a more legitimate event soon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...