Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter 2014-15 Banter Thread


Stormlover74

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Winters here are strange sometimes. You could get 70-90% of your average snow in one storm or you could get very little snow all winter. Sometimes there's a huge disconnect between the winter pattern and the results. For example 04/05 gave NYC 40" of snow but most occurred during a perfectly timed KU while most of that winter was mild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winters here are strange sometimes. You could get 70-90% of your average snow in one storm or you could get very little snow all winter. Sometimes there's a huge disconnect between the winter pattern and the results. For example 04/05 gave NYC 40" of snow but most occurred during a perfectly timed KU while most of that winter was mild.

This is why when we were making our snowfall predictions I went with very few overall events but above average snowfall. Quality over quantity in an El Nino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winters here are strange sometimes. You could get 70-90% of your average snow in one storm or you could get very little snow all winter. Sometimes there's a huge disconnect between the winter pattern and the results. For example 04/05 gave NYC 40" of snow but most occurred during a perfectly timed KU while most of that winter was mild.

1982-83 0 0 0 0 0 D 3.0 J 1.9  F 21.5 M T A 0.8 0 0 27.2  And if you ask those of us who were around for that winter . That Feb Blizzard is all we remember from it . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1982-83 0 0 0 0 0 D 3.0 J 1.9  F 21.5 M T A 0.8 0 0 27.2  And if you ask those of us who were around for that winter . That Feb Blizzard is all we remember from it . 

Yep or an even more extreme example. The most boring winter ever 94-95. One snow event the entire winter that gave us 100% of our total snowfall. I don't think any other winter exists that gave us 0 snow in Dec, Jan and March. Correction Central Park has .2 in January

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I know that some would say that a snowless December is a bad sign for the rest of the Winter, but the way I see it, no pattern is going to persist forever. So would you rather have things favorable now and less favorable during the heart of Winter? Or can we take what we can get now and when things eventually flip clean up later in the season?

it is bad if you are looking for a winter with much above normal snowfall here in NYC- look at the records dating back to the 1800's

 

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/monthseasonsnowfall.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is bad if you are looking for a winter with much above normal snowfall here in NYC- look at the records dating back to the 1800's

 

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/monthseasonsnowfall.html

Just looking from 2000 and shrinking the time frame I like the last 14 years .

8 above 2 Normal 4 Below .  71 ^ at or above . I will take those odds . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is bad if you are looking for a winter with much above normal snowfall here in NYC- look at the records dating back to the 1800's

 

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/monthseasonsnowfall.html

My prediction was based off of 3-4 high end events during the second half of Winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing you have to ask yourself is to get 50" it will probably take most of the winter being snowy or an extreme period like 2010-11. However we can get a nice 35-40" winter from one good 4-6 week period with one or two big storms like we saw in 2004-05. I'd

be very happy with a 2nd half winter like that if the first half sucks. Certainly better than having a great December early January and then shutting off the rest of the winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My prediction was based off of 3-4 high end events during the second half of Winter.

in other words you are looking for a winter comparable to 1977 - 78 but then again you predicted 12.7 inches of snow for  this month in the contest.......almost 3 X normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could the solar activity spike have affect our winter to an extent in which the 01/02 winter was affected. I remember many forecasts believes 01/02 would be a good winter only to end up one of the warmest and least snowiest in history because of high solar activity. I also read how it helps strengthen the stratospheric vortex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GREAT discussion in the main pattern thread today. Very refreshing to read and a good example of how good posters (Mets and hobbyists alike) can add such a great deal to this board when the posts like "well if the pattern was changing, where is the snow?" are kept out of it. No one has all of the answers, but reading stuff like we have in there today can give you some of the tools to finding out WHY the pattern is at it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in other words you are looking for a winter comparable to 1977 - 78 but then again you predicted 12.7 inches of snow for  this month in the contest.......almost 3 X normal

Yes I did, one good KU event during the second half of December. Hopefully we can get that NAO/AO flip that we've been patiently awaiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I did, one good KU event during the second half of December. Hopefully we can get that NAO/AO flip that we've been patiently awaiting.

KU events have only grown on trees since 1996 - there have only been 36 KU events ( 12 + inches ) in recorded history at NYC. 8 of them since 1996. Good luck with all the KU's you expect this year..........Common sense would tell one the frequency of such events should decrease in frequency soon............

 

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/footplussnow.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KU events have only grown on trees since 1996 - there have only been 36 KU events in recorded history at NYC. 8 of them since 1996. Good luck with all the KU's you expect this year..........Common sense would tell one the frequency of such events should decrease in frequency soon............

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/footplussnow.html

We currently remain in an active cycle as noted by the numerous heavy precipitation events over the past decade or so. You can't just say things will have to shut off because we've had these events so often, you have to show and prove why they will stop.

Also climate change is no joke and it could very well be part of the cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huge win by both the UKMET and EURO with it`s MJO amplitude and running it into the COD from 7 days ago . Just blew away the GFS .

Not a surprise there IMO. COD isnt exactly terrible for us. I for one am glad to see the NAO tanking towards nuetral around christmas. Big step in the right direction and the EPO always dipping quite a bit around that time period as well paul.

Those heights keeps on getting higher in canada as time goes on with the models, notably with the ECMWF/CANADIAN. The GFS seems very aggressive with getting greenland blocking well established ATM.

Regardless i am not dissapointed one bit with the pattern we have from the 17th and on especially with the strong +PNA picking up the work load. gave me my first coating of snow for the season last night and this morning. Not bad for a "stale air mass" if i must say so myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much for this so called torch. December will probably end up normal if not below in temps. <_<

 

There was really only one person calling for a torch, but he just did so over and over and over again. Foolish to let that poster act the way he did to be honest.

 

There was never any indications that this would be anything more than a transient warm up and pattern reload here in mid december. Almost anyone worth listening to reiterated it time and time again. i.e. Earthlight, PB GFI, HM, etc. Some people will forever continue to live and die by the 300+ hour OP runs I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KU events have only grown on trees since 1996 - there have only been 36 KU events ( 12 + inches ) in recorded history at NYC. 8 of them since 1996. Good luck with all the KU's you expect this year..........Common sense would tell one the frequency of such events should decrease in frequency soon............

 

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/climate/records/footplussnow.html

No offense, but I don't need a lesson on the frequency of KU events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...