Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

November II Discussion


CapturedNature

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't think normal LES has ratios that high, but I could be wrong. Maybe in some cases? The nature of LES and convection I think cause ratios to still be high, but aren't true fluff bombs. 

 

It depends on the specific microphysics of a particular case and where the greatest lift occurs. I've seen fairly dense snow fall from LE where surface temperatures were around freezing and 850 mb temperatures were around -10C (just under the 13C delta T threshold). The aggregates were wet due to some freezing but also probably some accretion of supercooled water. Other cases where it's really cold in the region of greatest lift you can get dry, low-density aggregates of pristine crystals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think normal LES has ratios that high, but I could be wrong. Maybe in some cases? The nature of LES and convection I think cause ratios to still be high, but aren't true fluff bombs. 

i have no idea, just going by what Buffalo guy said. even with 20-1 thats a lot of water with another 24 inches coming , yikes. Heavy heavy roof loads, then rain? serious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ART

New Snow Depth 10.5 in. New Snow Water Equivalent 0.80 in. Total Snow Depth 15.0 in. Total Snow Water Equivalent 1.10 in. (13.3 to 1)

That's all they got yesterday with all of those 1/4SM or less obs? The possible measuring error has to be pretty large in an event like this...snow and w.e.

Whatever though. It's a sh1tton of snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have no idea, just going by what Buffalo guy said. even with 20-1 thats a lot of water with another 24 inches coming , yikes. Heavy heavy roof loads, then rain? serious

I had like a foot of liquid on my roof in 07-08. The farmer down my road had his barn collapse. Hopefully people there roof rake it before it turns to a glacier like mine did.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After all of that, though, the 35" depth was a little underwhelming.

Most of us have seen that at one time or another.

Don't get me wrong....I'm sure there are some spots over 40".

Have you seen the pics in West Seneca? Not for nothing thats way more than the 35 Buffalo Soldier has, i have never seen that even with a 38 inch max depth. Arna has a 57 inch depth reported on Cocorahs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on the specific microphysics of a particular case and where the greatest lift occurs. I've seen fairly dense snow fall from LE where surface temperatures were around freezing and 850 mb temperatures were around -10C (just under the 13C delta T threshold). The aggregates were wet due to some freezing but also probably some accretion of supercooled water. Other cases where it's really cold in the region of greatest lift you can get dry, low-density aggregates of pristine crystals.

 

I just think with convection and latent heat release, you may locally raise the temperature a bit and also run the risk of riming if temps are warmer. Not to mention other cloud microphysics issues when you have convection involved. It all relates to what you said basically...but in this setup..I find 30:1 ratios are probably not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LES ratios can be higher than 30 to 1...I've seen it up around 40 to 1. But usually the snow is falling at a lighter rate when it's that high. More like an inch an hour or less rather than 4-5 inches per hour. 5 inches per hour just compacts down on itself too quickly to get 40 to 1.

 

Dendrite structure, moisture and sfc temps will all play a role of course as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...