ROOSTA Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Drove through Natick on my way to the GTG, should have stuck with my original guess, man what a downgrade Will made. Across the domain. In the hidden recesses still have visions of a couple of KU's dancing around. Still time might still go pop but hard to buck climo end of December. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Drove through Natick on my way to the GTG, should have stuck with my original guess, man what a downgrade Will made.What's Will thinking now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 What's Will thinking now?lol no in his move from ORH to Natick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 lol no in his move from ORH to Natick Natick is fine. They probably avg U50s in snow. That's actually a good spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Natick is fine. They probably avg U50s in snow. That's actually a good spot.That seems about right. I think I average about 58" here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Natick is fine. They probably avg U50s in snow. That's actually a good spot.snow retention sucks in that valley,huge downgrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Across the domain. In the hidden recesses still have visions of a couple of KU's dancing around. Still time might still go pop but hard to buck climo end of December. Plenty of time left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Natick is fine. They probably avg U50s in snow. That's actually a good spot. I think I was low 50's 53 or so in Framingham near Southboro Line. So prob around 51-52 in Natick. I think amount jump nicely just west of BOS but don't really get much higher till you hit those elevated spots in ORH. I would guess if the airport sees 67 or so that 500' (in city) is maybe at 60. . Def a sizeable downgrade from near 1K in N ORH, in retention/ R/S lines/frozen icing situ's elevation events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 That seems about right. I think I average about 58" here. seems a smidge high but maybe my memory is not based on accurate info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I think I was low 50's 53 or so in Framingham near Southboro Line. So prop around 50 in Natick, maybe 51 or so. MEH, CF on a few occasions pushed just about to that area while I was west in the one winter I was there....which was a very good winter for all. Def a big downgrade from near 1K in ORH. Nah they are higher for sure. Brookline is almost 50". My guess is U50s. Even Ray is like 62 or something like that. Natick has good longitude and is plenty west of the CF in most events. Will would back me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Nah they are higher for sure. Brookline is almost 50". My guess is U50s. Even Ray is like 62 or something like that. Natick has good longitude and is plenty west of the CF in most events. Will would back me up. Well on the map will posts with ave snowfall the 60" inch mark is west of 495 along the pike, I can picture that map pretty clearly so I respectfully disagree lol. But who cares anyway haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Well on the map will posts with ave snowfall the 60" inch mark is west of 495 along the pike, I can picture that map pretty clearly so I respectfully disagree lol. But who cares anyway haha51 per Wills map,181 ft elevation doesn't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Well on the map will posts with ave snowfall the 60" inch mark is west of 495 along the pike, I can picture that map pretty clearly so I respectfully disagree lol. But who cares anyway hahaYou're respectfully wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I avg 62-63" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I avg 62-63"no way Natick averages as much as you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 no way Natick averages as much as you They might. Anecdotal but I was so distraught 12/30/00 that I drove west on rt 9 until I was in legitimately getting crushed. Natick Mall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 They might. Anecdotal but I was so distraught 12/30/00 that I drove west on rt 9 until I was in legitimately getting crushed. Natick Mall.well of course they get more than you lol but same as Ray, not buying it. Natick Coop is pretty scrappy with data, don't know how anyone would really know anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 well of course they get more than you lol but same as Ray, not buying it. Natick Coop is pretty scrappy with data, don't know how anyone would really know anyways They're south of Ray but further from the ocean. Ray likely averages more but not by much. Also wooded neighborhoods retain it much better than areas near thorofares but nothing like ORH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Lol, were there any predictions here I think Boston gets 31.5" Orh 48" Ray 40" and Kev around 38" Odds currently favor below normal annual amounts thanks to that wonderful study Kevin kept citing this a.m from the folks at Taunton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 well of course they get more than you lol but same as Ray, not buying it. Natick Coop is pretty scrappy with data, don't know how anyone would really know anywaysThey avg in the high 50's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 They're south of Ray but further from the ocean. Ray likely averages more but not by much. Also wooded neighborhoods retain it much better than areas near thorofares but nothing like ORH. Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 They avg in the high 50's Yes. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 A lot of COOP data is imperfect, but interpolation can usually give a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 I guess I would lop about 15" in general off of my earlier predictions...Big Novie here helped but Dec hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I guess I would lop about 15" in general off of my earlier predictions...Big Novie here helped but Dec hurtProbably.....I may back from 90-100" to 80-90". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yeah Steve doesn't know what he is talking abotu with Natick...how would he know anything about snow retention there by driving through the town after a month in which nobody had any snow? It retains snow fine...it's not ORH, but most places aren't. But it west of the criticial 128 belt. They average around high 50s like a few of the more knowledgable E MA posters already said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yeah Steve doesn't know what he is talking abotu with Natick...how would he know anything about snow retention there by driving through the town after a month in which nobody had any snow? It retains snow fine...it's not ORH, but most places aren't. But it west of the criticial 128 belt. They average around high 50s like a few of the more knowledgable E MA posters already said. I would think here could be a pretty wide range in town as well. Decent sized area with some topography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 The Wikipedia article on the town shows 48" as per 1981-2010 NOAA...weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 The Wikipedia article on the town shows 48" as per 1981-2010 NOAA...weirdThat is very wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 That is very wrong.Yeah that entry FTL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.