Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,600
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

NNE Winter Thread


powderfreak

Recommended Posts

Event totals: 0.3” Snow/0.01" L.E.

 

Today's observations for the current event are below; I probably could have gotten measurable liquid out of that second round if I'd cored it sooner, but it's definitely sublimating and only averaged 0.004" out of three stacked cores by the time I checked it, so it goes down as a trace.

 

Details from the 6:00 A.M. Waterbury observations:

 

New Snow: 0.1 inches

New Liquid: 0.01 inches

Snow/Water Ratio: 10.0

Snow Density: 10.0% H2O

Temperature: 9.1 F

Sky: Light Snow/Flurries

Snow at the stake: 1.0"

 

Details from the 2:00 P.M. Waterbury observations:

 

New Snow: 0.2 inches

New Liquid: Trace

Temperature: 22.3 F

Sky: Partly Cloudy

Snow at the stake: 1.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, I noticed that when you had posted your numbers before; that's probably an arrangement that won't happen too often. The numbers here are Nov 22.2"/Dec 24.9", so December did end out on top by a bit. When December and November come in close like that, it's almost guaranteed to be December's fault – I don’t have any Novembers in my records up near the typical 40" December numbers, and I suspect a 40" November would be tough to do down here in the valley.

Seasonal snowfall is a few inches behind average here now with the somewhat cold & clear setup we've had the past few days, but hopefully this next stretch will help to keep things somewhat on pace.

Yeah a few lucky snowfalls during those lake effect streamers in November really helped...like 3.5" and 2.5" type snowfalls has me running better than normal relative to like your numbers. I'm always behind you by this point in the year, haha, but with the lack of larger upslope events that favor your area, I've been able to hang in there ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some cool Lake Champlain effect snow this morning for those interested in mesoscale stuff:

 

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=789552861116617

We got a good 1-2" at Lincoln peak. Certainly freshened things up. Fine dust. Didn't do much for the ungroomed terrain. A mess Saturday night might be just what the doctor ordered.

Happy new year everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we saw from reports in the thread this morning, there were various appetizer snows starting today, but we're getting close on this next event that PF mentioned, and the BTV NWS forecast discussion shared some thoughts:

 

BY FRIDAY EARLY MORNING A SURFACE FRONT WILL BEGIN DRIFTING SOUTH FROM CANADA INTO THE NORTH COUNTRY AND IT WILL COLLECT THE LAKE EFFECT SNOW BAND AND PUSH IT SOUTH. THE COMBINATION OF THE MOISTURE IN THE LOW LEVELS FROM THE LAKES AND THE SURFACE FORCING FROM THE FRONT WILL ALLOW FOR A CHANCE OF SYNOPTIC SNOW SHOWERS ACROSS MOST OF THE NORTH COUNTRY ON FRIDAY DURING THE DAY AND EARLY EVENING. THE HIGHER TERRAIN WILL LIKELY SEE ENHANCED SNOW FALL AND I WOULDN`T BE SURPRISED IF JAY PEAK ETC SAW A FOOT OF SNOW WITH THE FRONT DROPPING SOUTH.

 

Perhaps they're thinking of something similar to those two episodes that hit us back around November 20th during the big lake-effect period?  It's always appreciated when the lakes inject an extra shot of moisture this way; combining lake-effect with upslope can lead to some good stuff as we saw last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTV discussion notes the potential for mountain snows on Thurs/Friday...

"The combination of the moisture in the low levels from the lakes and the surface forcing from the front will allow for a chance of synoptic snow showers across most of the north country on Friday during the day and early evening. The higher terrain will like see enhanced snow fall and I wouldn't be surprised if Jay Peak et cetera saw a foot of snow with the front dropping south. &&"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is worth posting too... Great AFD as usual from TABER on the weekend system:

&& Long term /Saturday through Wednesday/... as of 250 PM EST Wednesday...an active days 4 through 7 expected across the north country...with two precipitation events anticipated. Saturday will feature surface high pressure shifting into northern New England and clouds increasing during the afternoon hours. The calm before the storm with temperatures after a very chilly start warming into the 20s. First system arrives late Sat night into Sunday...with snow changing to a wintry mix...then to drizzle/freezing drizzle...before ending as some light mountain snow showers. This event looks like advisory type snowfall in the valleys and low end warning in the favorable southeast upslope regions of the dacks/Green Mountains All models in good agreement with potent short wave energy ejecting from middle/upper level trough across the inter mountain west on Friday with surface low pressure developing over the MS valley. This surface low will race NE into the Ohio Valley...then up the slv on Sunday...placing our County Warning Area in the warm sector. GFS/ECMWF/Gem initially show thermal profiles cold enough to support a burst of snow Sat night into Sunday morning...associated with strong 850 to 700mb fgen forcing...favorable deep layer moisture profiles (pw values between 0.65 to 0... strong upward vertical velocities associated dual couplet of 850 mb jet of 55 to 65 knots and rrq of 25h jet across southern Canada. These favorable dynamics and moisture quickly lift from SW to NE across our County Warning Area between 06z-12z Sunday...with a period of moderate snow expected. Also...given such strong low level wind fields...expecting some shadowing of precipitation/snowfall with lighter amounts across the western slopes/cpv and parts of the nek...with higher quantitative precipitation forecast/snowfall in the favorable southeast orographic upslope regions of the central Green Mountains and eastern dacks. Initial accumulations given track/quick movement and thermal profiles supports 1 to 4 inches cpv/nek downslope regions to 4 to 8 inches eastern dacks/southeast upslope regions of the Green Mountains from Ludlow to Sugarbush to Stowe to Jay Peak...with some light ice accumulation possible on Sunday morning. Low level 850 mb jet will quickly push very warm air into our region with prognosticated temperatures at 850 mb near +6c by 18z Sunday...and the 1000 to 500mb 540dm line well north of our County Warning Area...resulting in snow changing to a wintry mix...then to rain/drizzle by 15z Sunday. Current forecast has this transition handled very well in grids and will keep current thinking. Given the fast southwest follow aloft...system will be very progressive with impacts only lasting 6 to 12 hours...and middle/upper level dry slot quickly racing from SW to NE across our County Warning Area on Sunday. This dry slot will result in steadier/heavier precipitation...switching to a drizzle...with pockets of freezing drizzle possible between 1000 and 2000 feet per latest GFS sounding. Temperatures Saturday night will start cold...especially east of The Greens where low level cold air will be trapped...but will quickly warm toward middle night with increasing southerly follow and precipitation developing. Will try to show this trend in hrly temperature grids. Temperatures on Sunday will be extremely tricking and highly depend upon amount of mixing. Have noted near 7c at 950mb off the GFS sounding for btv...which would support middle/upper 40s...maybe near 50f. Otherwise...colder/protected valleys will stay mainly in the middle/upper 30s on Sunday. Bottom line expect a large range in surface temperatures depending upon elevation/location from western dacks/slv to nek/lower CT River Valley. Surface cold front sweeps quickly across our County Warning Area late Sunday into Monday with strong low level cold air advection. However...deep layer moisture is north of our County Warning Area...so even with favorable backside northwest upslope follow...qpf/snowfall will be light...given the lack of moisture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Borrowing dendrite's format (again):

 

December 2014

 

Averages/Totals
Max 31.65°F (+0.85°F)
Min 18.39°F (+5.34°F)
Mean 25.02F (+3.09°F)  6th mildest of 17. 

The avg diurnal range of 13.26F is the lowest, by 1.78F, for any month in my records.

Precip 6.46"   +2.04"

Snow 17.7"    -1.9"

SnowDD 250   3rd most for Dec, behind 2003 and 2007.

Extremes
High Max 46°F (1st)
Low Min -12°F (8th)
Low Max 12°F (8th)
High Min 32°F (24th, 25th)

Max Rain 1.60" (10th)

Max Snow 7.5" (13th)

Max Snowstorm 7.5" (13th)

Max Depth 14" (13th)

Some notes on the year of 2014:

Average temp of 40.13F was 2nd coolest.  (2007: 39.99)

Average maxima of 50.76F was coolest.  (2009: 51.04)

 

Total precip of 51.96" was +1.94" and 5th highest.

Largest one-day:  1.94" on Aug 14.

Largest precip event:  2.75" on Dec 9-11.

 

Largest snowstorm:  13.5" on March 12-13.

Greatest snowdepth:  43" on March 20.  (That was at 9 PM.  My 7 AM obs for cocorahs was 46".)

 

13 days with thunder were 2.6 below avg, and we omly had thunder in 3 months (May 1; July 8; Aug 4)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah a few lucky snowfalls during those lake effect streamers in November really helped...like 3.5" and 2.5" type snowfalls has me running better than normal relative to like your numbers. I'm always behind you by this point in the year, haha, but with the lack of larger upslope events that favor your area, I've been able to hang in there ;).

 

Yeah, that's awesome though, it's kind of nice to get some of those surprises and witness some of the other mechanisms the Northern Greens have for getting snow.  Even though things are basically running around average now (about half a foot behind at our site as of today), and my numbers are actually only a couple inches ahead of last season, hopefully there's not another January with 30-40% of average snowfall on the way.  After the way the past few seasons have gone relative to average, it's nice to see the VT sites doing well:

 

01JAN15A.jpg

 

What's neat about the VT sites on that list is that they're covering some disparate areas, like the NEK, southern Champlain Valley, and Northern Greens spine/east slope, so all those areas are doing OK in a relative sense.  Presumably Orwell is well ahead of average on snowfall as I think you guys were discussing a while back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After finalizing with yesterday morning's data, totals for December here came in at 24.9" snow/4.89" L.E., and for the accumulating snowfall season that began on 11/6 this time around, the numbers are 47.1" snow/7.91" L.E.  Based on my data set, December snowfall was 61.3% of average, and season snowfall is running at 89.2% of average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A surprise 2.5" on the 3000ft snowboard. Pure dust haha.

 

Today's new snow didn't do much to the conditions as it was low density stuff, but cosmetically it went a long way towards whitening up the evergreens and bringing back that nice wintery look of snow on the trees.

 

Looks like winter again up there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A surprise 2.5" on the 3000ft snowboard. Pure dust haha.

 

 

Pure dust that skied really well for my first day back on the flying sofas. 

 

Pretty interesting front dynamics tonight. Certainly possible there is some hook up with the flow off the lakes and the Northern Greens gets a surprising 6+ tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's awesome though, it's kind of nice to get some of those surprises and witness some of the other mechanisms the Northern Greens have for getting snow.  Even though things are basically running around average now (about half a foot behind at our site as of today), and my numbers are actually only a couple inches ahead of last season, hopefully there's not another January with 30-40% of average snowfall on the way.  After the way the past few seasons have gone relative to average, it's nice to see the VT sites doing well:

 

01JAN15A.jpg

 

What's neat about the VT sites on that list is that they're covering some disparate areas, like the NEK, southern Champlain Valley, and Northern Greens spine/east slope, so all those areas are doing OK in a relative sense.  Presumably Orwell is well ahead of average on snowfall as I think you guys were discussing a while back.

 

That is a great point and fun to see... the VT sites at the top of the list span all the different areas.  Champlain Valley to the NEK.  While here in the mountains we are losing ground to climo every day now that it doesn't snow, the Champlain Valley still has to be a bit above normal...but not quite the same as ApacheTrout having 40" by mid-December.  That's a very solid total for the CPV for that time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pure dust that skied really well for my first day back on the flying sofas. 

 

Pretty interesting front dynamics tonight. Certainly possible there is some hook up with the flow off the lakes and the Northern Greens gets a surprising 6+ tonight. 

 

Tomorrow morning has my attention with the front.  The radar though has been showing moisture working into the mountains this evening, and it was snowing lightly but steadily at the end of the day up there.  Who knows, but I'm thinking just an inch or so overnight.  Could see where its sneaky above 3,000ft with slightly more saturated air...one of those things where its like 0.75" at the base in real dry air, but like 3-4" up at 3,000ft+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PF how does Waterbury do better than your condo? Is it because you are further east of Mansfield as compared to Waterbury and the mtns just west of them? That's awesome you have 48" even at Stowe village.

 

Its on a more localized scale than just towns... parts of Stowe get more snow than parts of Waterbury, and parts of Waterbury get more snow than parts of Stowe, lol.  Its hard to really illustrate how localized the differences can be in this area...but you saw it in that event earlier in December where it was raining in one area, and snowing significantly 2 miles down the road in another area of Stowe.  Its not even elevation dependent at times, and yearly precip amounts aren't as much tied to elevation but more actual location in respect to the Spine axis. 

 

The town of Stowe goes from the 3,000+ (peak of 3,600ft) ridgeline of the Worecester Range to the east, to the 4,000ft ridgeline of Mansfield in the west.  So there can be some highly variable snowfall amounts across town depending on slight meso-scale and wind differences.

 

Waterbury mirrors Stowe to the south, and can also have highly variable snowfall from west to east.

 

 

J.Spin is on the actual Spine axis and averages a few more inches of annual liquid than my location.  On this map below, the red dots include the Mountain Operations office (west red dot) and where I actually reside.  The blue represents J.Spin's location in the west, and the center of Waterbury to the east.  There can be a significant differences in orographic events depending on the Froude number.  Blocked flow and low froude can really cut off the precip on the east side, so much so that its snowing at the Mtn Ops office and J.Spin's house, but the sun is out at my house and in the center of Waterbury.  The biggest differences in the seasonal totals generally occur during those events, especially with J.Spin's location being a localized convergence zone in the Winooski Valley through the mountains, including the Bolton Flats.  West winds and blocked flow can really squeeze out the moisture there as the moisture gets squeezed between the mountains.

 

 

Anyway.... haha sorry that was so wordy... at home in the village we are hanging on to 3" of crusty snowpack.  This stuff is rock hard and you could probably drive a car over it without sinking into it, lol.  I think the upcoming pattern has good potential, but also risky with cutters a real possibility.  The cold will be impressive regardless.  Photo of the neighboring condos.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mansfield Coop comes in with a 3" increase in depth but only a Trace of new snow.

 

I had 2.5" on the snow board... looks like a board was a better measuring device than the wind-swept rain gauge for measuring snow today.

DAILY HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL DATA
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BURLINGTON VT
603 PM EST WED DEC 31 2014

STATION            PRECIP   TEMPERATURE   PRESENT         SNOW
                   24 HRS   MAX MIN CUR   WEATHER     NEW TOTAL SWE
...VERMONT...
MOUNT MANSFIELD     0.02     4  -5   1                  T  29
DAILY HYDROMEOROLOGICAL DATA
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BURLINGTON VT
552 PM EST THU JAN 1 2015

STATION            PRECIP   TEMPERATURE   PRESENT         SNOW
                   24 HRS   MAX MIN CUR   WEATHER     NEW TOTAL SWE
...VERMONT...
MOUNT MANSFIELD        T     8   0   8                  T  32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

J.Spin is on the actual Spine axis and averages a few more inches of annual liquid than my location.  On this map below, the red dots include the Mountain Operations office (west red dot) and where I actually reside.  The blue represents J.Spin's location in the west, and the center of Waterbury to the east.  There can be a significant differences in orographic events depending on the Froude number.  Blocked flow and low froude can really cut off the precip on the east side, so much so that its snowing at the Mtn Ops office and J.Spin's house, but the sun is out at my house and in the center of Waterbury.  The biggest differences in the seasonal totals generally occur during those events, especially with J.Spin's location being a localized convergence zone in the Winooski Valley through the mountains, including the Bolton Flats.  West winds and blocked flow can really squeeze out the moisture there as the moisture gets squeezed between the mountains.

 

01JAN15C.jpg

 

Following up on PFs comments from above, I created an image in Google Earth looking through the Green Mountain Spine at the point of the Winooski Valley:

 

01JAN15B.jpg

 

With respect to PFs overhead map from the quoted text, the Google Earth image here would be looking eastward from a vantage point near/southwest of the Richmond area.  My location is around where the "y" is in Winooski Valley, and you can see the center of Waterbury roughly 2 to 3 miles behind that point.  Our place is only at an elevation of ~500', which is ~200'-300' lower than PF's place as I recall, but in terms of snowfall, the elevation difference appears to be more than made up for by the fact that we're much more in line with the axis of the spine of the Greens.  This means that our area can get in on upslope precipitation in just about any storm with flow from the east or west.  The Stowe Village (and likewise Waterbury Village) areas to the east of the spine cash in if the flow is from the east, or when flow from the west or northwest occurs with appropriately high Froude Numbers, but our area along the spine gets an added boost in snowfall by getting in on flow from the west with somewhat lower Froude Numbers as well.  These are the types of events where the Western Slopes (areas in the foreground of the Google Earth image) are getting bombed, but the moisture is not making it over the spine very well.  As you can see in the image, the air flowing from the west can try to squeeze through the Winooski Valley, as it is a prominent gap in the wall of the Greens.  But, the air gets funneled in there, and this presumably creates the area of convergence and gives the location an additional boost in precipitation/snowfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...