Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Oct 31- Nov 2nd Storm Disco


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Some get very touchy over this day 5-6 stuff.

It could go both ways, right now it's not being modeled at the surface. As 40/70 often says, it's a shame we don't live at H5.

hopefully it goes back to that awesome look of the other day of a wicked good upslope event. Lots of the analogs were great for you. I'd rather discuss possibilities.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry .. this sounds like a down spin.

truth? "500 low over your head can be some CU and a few flakes too" sure! In April, when ULLs rot and there are no 110kt jet cores ripping into the underbelly right through climate central, ripping a frontogenic potential (not to mention) out of hades it's self.

Not for me. The surface dictions are incorrect and the QPF is under modeled as an almost immediate correction requirement.

we cant discuss this for fear of being snowstorm mongers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hopefully it goes back to that awesome look of the other day of a wicked good upslope event. Lots of the analogs were great for you. I'd rather discuss possibilities.

I'm out of town for the weekend so I've got no horse in the race...personally it goes both ways, would love to come back on Tuesday to snow but would also not want to miss a sweet event.

The H5 progs are pretty wild, but I do trust the models enough that there's something missing right now that isn't causing the real potential to hit the surface. As we discussed earlier, I think instability showers changing to snow showers with the core overhead is a good bet right now. Those cold troughs swinging through the Lakes region this time of year, entraining some moisture from the high delta-Ts, then moving directly over New England...I picture a shredded radar with maybe an area or two of more organized stuff amid numerous showers, lake bands, stuff sparked over the terrain but able to carry all the way to the coast with mid-level support...all the while the p-type radar goes from green to almost all blue cellular stuff. A few spots picking up an inch or so under the better showers.

That to me is what I'd lean towards at this point. Still freakin' sweet cause I'm on the most should see flakes train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that isn't a cutoff. Again I have no idea how this got spun into some sort of weenie argument.

 

I'm not arguing with anyone... (but I'm not sure you meant me...?)  

 

Heads down in code all day at work... Come home, got impressed by a lot of products; preceded to a party policed blogosphere to the extent that would make the soup-Nazi envious, and decided to point out that's a bit contrived the way it comes off as "too" conservative.  

 

I don't care about that other stuff -- whatever it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm out of town for the weekend so I've got no horse in the race...personally it goes both ways, would love to come back on Tuesday to snow but would also not want to miss a sweet event.

The H5 progs are pretty wild, but I do trust the models enough that there's something missing right now that isn't causing the real potential to hit the surface. As we discussed earlier, I think instability showers changing to snow showers with the core overhead is a good bet right now. Those cold troughs swinging through the Lakes region this time of year, entraining some moisture from the high delta-Ts, then moving directly over New England...I picture a shredded radar with maybe an area or two of more organized stuff amid numerous showers, lake bands, stuff sparked over the terrain but able to carry all the way to the coast with mid-level support...all the while the p-type radar goes from green to almost all blue cellular stuff. A few spots picking up an inch or so under the better showers.

That to me is what I'd lean towards at this point. Still freakin' sweet cause I'm on the most should see flakes train.

exactly what I picture,that's all I am saying
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing with anyone... (but I'm not sure you meant me...?)

Heads down in code all day at work... Come home, got impressed by a lot of products; preceded to a party policed blogosphere to the extent that would make the soup-Nazi envious, and decided to point out that's a bit contrived the way it comes off as "too" conservative.

I don't care about that other stuff -- whatever it is.

Just ease back and enjoy the new Taylor Swift CD you picked up at Target today
Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly what I picture,that's all I am saying

 

Pretty huge win and plenty to be excited about for so early in the season. 

I also am impressed by the mid levels in general.  Historically there have certainly been impressive troughs -- sure. But this is nothing to shake a stick at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing with anyone... (but I'm not sure you meant me...?)

Heads down in code all day at work... Come home, got impressed by a lot of products; preceded to a party policed blogosphere to the extent that would make the soup-Nazi envious, and decided to point out that's a bit contrived the way it comes off as "too" conservative.

I don't care about that other stuff -- whatever it is.

No I didn't mean you. I'm well aware how his could be bigger, but I think you believe I'm downplaying it when I am not. I was just clarifying something about closed lows. Lol it's all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In any event .. of course this could totally miss...  My own point of contention is that ignoring the heavier impact potential too willfully isn't a very sound forecast philosophy.

 

I'll leave it at that.

 

Completely Understand where you're coming from Tip. Very good points IMO, and very Sound as usual(you are incredibly Intelligent/Experienced...most Impressive). I also get why people are trying to stay tempered as well...trying not to get to carried away/excited about "What Could Be?" As usual, there is lots that has to come together for this to be a "High Impact Event." And there is more of a Chance that it just "Doesn't!" And we are 5 days out still.

As Tip pointed out, it's O.K. to talk about the "Heavier impact potential," and not be branded a Winnie either...if it's kept in some type of control. From this inexperienced poster(inexperienced with regard to most of your Degrees, knowledge and Professions), there does seem to be quite a bit of Potential within this set-up. And I think Tip is seeing all of this (as are alot of you as well), and he is just telling us what his gut is telling him could very well happen if these things come together like he thinks they should.

Personally, I love the both sides of the coin discussion. Love hearing why it may not happen/come together. And why it could/should from guys like Typhoon Tip. Great info Fella's. JB has been posting on his site(I'm a member) about how he thinks the models should be correcting to more of a phased system since Saturday night...and how it "COULD" become a bigger event for the east coast. Hey, it's fun to have something to watch whatever happens.

Glad to be along for the ride. :-).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I didn't mean you. I'm well aware how his could be bigger, but I think you believe I'm downplaying it when I am not. I was just clarifying something about closed lows. Lol it's all good.

 

Yeah I should be more clear -- I used yours as an example in the sense of the royal you; as you , yous guys'...  In all fairness, I didn't pay much attention to who said what, just the what... 

 

Btw folks, hard to ignore the indian summer potentially signaled later next week - ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...