Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

T-Storms Part 2 : "North and West of the city!"


TalcottWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That's exactly the scan time I was looking at. CC and velocity would say yes, ZDR is less clear. But it does move with time in the direction of the storm motion, and has vertical continuity. So I'm pretty confident that's not an artifact.

We're finding more and more ZDR is not appropriate for determining a TDS signature.  Size sorting by shear tends to leave a higher number of large oblate hydrometeors near the updraft, which can be easily entrained into the circulation and skew ZDR high.  This is especially the case for QLCSs, HP supercells, or supercells embedded in precip.  Schultz et al. 2012a and b do not use ZDR for any identification purposes beyond "added confidence."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAUNTON MA

115 AM EDT MON SEP 1 2014

...TORNADO CONFIRMED IN WORCESTER MA ON AUGUST 31 2014...

LOCATION...WORCESTER IN WORCESTER COUNTY MA

DATE...AUGUST 31 2014

ESTIMATED TIME...810-814 PM EDT

MAXIMUM EF-SCALE RATING...EF0

ESTIMATED MAXIMUM WIND SPEED...85 MPH

MAXIMUM PATH WIDTH...0.1 MILES

PATH LENGTH...1.7 MILES

BEGINNING LAT/LON...42.24N / 71.80W

ENDING LAT/LON...42.26N / 71.77W

* FATALITIES...0

* INJURIES...0

* THE INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO

CHANGE PENDING FINAL REVIEW OF THE EVENT(S) AND PUBLICATION IN

NWS STORM DATA.

...SUMMARY...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN TAUNTON MA HAS CONFIRMED THAT A

A TORNADO TOUCHED DOWN IN THE CITY OF WORCESTER MA ON AUGUST 31

2014.

A NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TEAM INVESTIGATED THE DAMAGE WITH THE

HELP OF A MEMBER OF THE WORCESTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY LATE

THIS EVENING. NUMEROUS REPORTS FROM AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS AND

SKYWARN SPOTTERS HELPED FOCUS WHICH AREAS WERE IN NEED OF

INVESTIGATION.

THE INITIAL TOUCHDOWN OCCURRED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF PERRY

AVENUE AND FAIRFAX ROAD...JUST TO THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 290 AND

NORTH OF ROUTE 146. THERE WAS A WELL-DEFINED NARROW PATH OF

DAMAGE THAT EXTENDED NORTHEASTWARD FOR NEARLY 1.7 MILES...PASSING

JUST EAST OF SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL AND ENDING ON GORDON STREET...

JUST NORTH OF HAMILTON STREET AND WEST OF HARRINGTON WAY.

NO DAMAGE WAS SEEN NEAR NORTH HIGH SCHOOL.

OVERALL...THE DAMAGE WAS MOSTLY TO TREES...SOME OF WHICH WERE

UPROOTED OR SNAPPED. THE SNAPPING OCCURRED 40-50 FEET ABOVE THE

GROUND IN SOME LOCATIONS AND CLOSER TO THE BASES AT OTHER

LOCATIONS. SOME TREES LANDED ON CARS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO

THE CARS. A COUPLE OF TREES ALSO LANDED ON HOMES. HOWEVER THERE

WAS LITTLE IF ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO HOMES IN AN AREA THAT IS

RELATIVELY DENSELY POPULATED WITH HOMES. A FEW WINDOWS WERE

BROKEN...BUT BY BRANCHES HITTING THEM AND NOT BY BEING BLOW OUT.

ON HEYWOOD STREET TO THE EAST OF SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL...A FEW

NARROW METAL POLES WERE SNAPPED BUT THE POLES HAD NETTING

ATTACHED TO THEM WHICH COULD HAVE ACTED SOMEWHAT AS A SAIL.

A SOCCER NET WAS ENTANGLED IN TREES. IN A FIELD...A FEW LARGE

BRANCHES WERE FOUND THAT APPARENTLY HAD BEEN AIRBORN AND DEPOSITED

IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FIELD...FAR FROM ANY TREES. THERE WAS

DISTINCT EVIDENCE OF TORNADIC FLOW...WITH TREES BLOWN DOWN FROM

SOUTHWEST TO NORTHEAST ON ONE SIDE AND NORTHEAST TO SOUTHWEST ON

THE OTHER SIDE AT THAT LOCATION.

ACCORDING TO THE DEGREES OF DAMAGE PORTION OF THE ENHANCED FUJITA

SCALE...THE MAJORITY OF THE DAMAGE WAS AT THE VERY HIGH END OF THE

EF0 SCALE...WHICH CORRESPONDS TO WIND SPEEDS OF APPROXIMATELY

85 MPH. DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED A TORNADIC DEBRIS SIGNATURE AT

811 PM AND THUS WE ESTIMATE THAT THE TORNADO BEGAN AT 810 PM AND

WAS ON THE GROUND UNTIL 814 PM. RADAR INDICATED THAT THE DEBRIS

SIGNATURE CONTINUED FOR SEVERAL MORE MINUTES WITH ROTATION

CONTINUING ALOFT...BUT THERE WAS NO MORE EVIDENCE OF DAMAGE ON THE

GROUND AFTER 814 PM.

AGAIN...THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR

AMATEUR RADIO SKYWARN SPOTTERS AND THE WORCESTER EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR ENABLING US TO RAPIDLY INVESTIGATE THE

DAMAGE FROM THIS STORM.

THIS INFORMATION CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE AT

WEATHER.GOV/BOX.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAUNTON MA

115 AM EDT MON SEP 1 2014

...TORNADO CONFIRMED IN WORCESTER MA ON AUGUST 31 2014...

LOCATION...WORCESTER IN WORCESTER COUNTY MA

DATE...AUGUST 31 2014

ESTIMATED TIME...810-814 PM EDT

MAXIMUM EF-SCALE RATING...EF0

ESTIMATED MAXIMUM WIND SPEED...85 MPH

MAXIMUM PATH WIDTH...0.1 MILES

PATH LENGTH...1.7 MILES

BEGINNING LAT/LON...42.24N / 71.80W

ENDING LAT/LON...42.26N / 71.77W

* FATALITIES...0

* INJURIES...0

* THE INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO

CHANGE PENDING FINAL REVIEW OF THE EVENT(S) AND PUBLICATION IN

NWS STORM DATA.

...SUMMARY...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN TAUNTON MA HAS CONFIRMED THAT A

A TORNADO TOUCHED DOWN IN THE CITY OF WORCESTER MA ON AUGUST 31

2014.

A NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TEAM INVESTIGATED THE DAMAGE WITH THE

HELP OF A MEMBER OF THE WORCESTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY LATE

THIS EVENING. NUMEROUS REPORTS FROM AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS AND

SKYWARN SPOTTERS HELPED FOCUS WHICH AREAS WERE IN NEED OF

INVESTIGATION.

THE INITIAL TOUCHDOWN OCCURRED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF PERRY

AVENUE AND FAIRFAX ROAD...JUST TO THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 290 AND

NORTH OF ROUTE 146. THERE WAS A WELL-DEFINED NARROW PATH OF

DAMAGE THAT EXTENDED NORTHEASTWARD FOR NEARLY 1.7 MILES...PASSING

JUST EAST OF SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL AND ENDING ON GORDON STREET...

JUST NORTH OF HAMILTON STREET AND WEST OF HARRINGTON WAY.

NO DAMAGE WAS SEEN NEAR NORTH HIGH SCHOOL.

OVERALL...THE DAMAGE WAS MOSTLY TO TREES...SOME OF WHICH WERE

UPROOTED OR SNAPPED. THE SNAPPING OCCURRED 40-50 FEET ABOVE THE

GROUND IN SOME LOCATIONS AND CLOSER TO THE BASES AT OTHER

LOCATIONS. SOME TREES LANDED ON CARS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO

THE CARS. A COUPLE OF TREES ALSO LANDED ON HOMES. HOWEVER THERE

WAS LITTLE IF ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO HOMES IN AN AREA THAT IS

RELATIVELY DENSELY POPULATED WITH HOMES. A FEW WINDOWS WERE

BROKEN...BUT BY BRANCHES HITTING THEM AND NOT BY BEING BLOW OUT.

ON HEYWOOD STREET TO THE EAST OF SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL...A FEW

NARROW METAL POLES WERE SNAPPED BUT THE POLES HAD NETTING

ATTACHED TO THEM WHICH COULD HAVE ACTED SOMEWHAT AS A SAIL.

A SOCCER NET WAS ENTANGLED IN TREES. IN A FIELD...A FEW LARGE

BRANCHES WERE FOUND THAT APPARENTLY HAD BEEN AIRBORN AND DEPOSITED

IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FIELD...FAR FROM ANY TREES. THERE WAS

DISTINCT EVIDENCE OF TORNADIC FLOW...WITH TREES BLOWN DOWN FROM

SOUTHWEST TO NORTHEAST ON ONE SIDE AND NORTHEAST TO SOUTHWEST ON

THE OTHER SIDE AT THAT LOCATION.

ACCORDING TO THE DEGREES OF DAMAGE PORTION OF THE ENHANCED FUJITA

SCALE...THE MAJORITY OF THE DAMAGE WAS AT THE VERY HIGH END OF THE

EF0 SCALE...WHICH CORRESPONDS TO WIND SPEEDS OF APPROXIMATELY

85 MPH. DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED A TORNADIC DEBRIS SIGNATURE AT

811 PM AND THUS WE ESTIMATE THAT THE TORNADO BEGAN AT 810 PM AND

WAS ON THE GROUND UNTIL 814 PM. RADAR INDICATED THAT THE DEBRIS

SIGNATURE CONTINUED FOR SEVERAL MORE MINUTES WITH ROTATION

CONTINUING ALOFT...BUT THERE WAS NO MORE EVIDENCE OF DAMAGE ON THE

GROUND AFTER 814 PM.

AGAIN...THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR

AMATEUR RADIO SKYWARN SPOTTERS AND THE WORCESTER EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR ENABLING US TO RAPIDLY INVESTIGATE THE

DAMAGE FROM THIS STORM.

THIS INFORMATION CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE AT

WEATHER.GOV/BOX.

We had noticed an additional bit of rotation into Connecticut earlier today as spotted by velocity scans.

 

http://weather-talk.net/?attachment_id=6775  <---- Velocity Scan showing rotation.

 

Although I am under the idea that no tornado had actually developed from this particular rotation, I am surprised once again at the number of tornado-type incidents we have been having up here into New England. I am starting to wonder if this will become more common as we head into the later days of summer and early autumn, and if this could carry over into next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had noticed an additional bit of rotation into Connecticut earlier today as spotted by velocity scans.

 

http://weather-talk.net/?attachment_id=6775  <---- Velocity Scan showing rotation.

 

Although I am under the idea that no tornado had actually developed from this particular rotation, I am surprised once again at the number of tornado-type incidents we have been having up here into New England. I am starting to wonder if this will become more common as we head into the later days of summer and early autumn, and if this could carry over into next year.

 

:weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy stuff for some people.  Congrats to all who were able to enjoy things, and good thoughts to those who now need to deal with their car insurance companies.

 

We pulled off a whopping .02" of rain with absolutely no thunder.  GC, ftl.

 

Maybe .1" at home. I can't buy even a third of an inch of rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That tornado in ORH was close to the wind mill generator at Holy Name.....that thing must've been spinning! Although I'm sure they have some kind of braking mechanism.

Most shut down above 45 mph.

There is also a Walmart on Rte 146 with a bunch of small turbines in the parking lot. Wonder if those were affected

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're finding more and more ZDR is not appropriate for determining a TDS signature.  Size sorting by shear tends to leave a higher number of large oblate hydrometeors near the updraft, which can be easily entrained into the circulation and skew ZDR high.  This is especially the case for QLCSs, HP supercells, or supercells embedded in precip.  Schultz et al. 2012a and b do not use ZDR for any identification purposes beyond "added confidence."

 

Last night it seemed to be bolded case. I actually wasn't aware of that research but I'm glad to hear it, as it makes total sense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a nice PNS write up with the added tidbit about dual-pol. I like seeing that information being put out there.

 

Yeah was nice to see. Tough storm to warn for... only one volume scan where things really tightened up. By the time the TDS appeared the tornado had almost lifted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That thing was odd.   No lightning, or very little by the time the TOR event took place. 

 

I'm up here in Ayer, which as the crow flies was plenty close enough for a SC's pulsing illuminations to be seen.  Yet, I saw nothing...nadda.  Not one flash.

 

I was wondering if the fact that geopotential heights are around 582 to 588, with dm thickness well over 570 might have something to do with it, in that cloud tops were only partially glaciating.  But that's speculation...  I was also wondering if the TOR was a momentum transfer/curl thing, that had less to do with an actual updraft -- can that be identified by rad?  

 

In other words, if there was sufficient downdraft that tugged some of the mid level wind field down, and at less than meso-scale it curled around the hilly topography of Worcester, could that have mimicked a tornadic event??  There is a phenomenon known as "gustnado", which is just that ... when downburst/outflow winds curl into land-spouts, not associated with sustained updraft. 

 

I suppose in the end it wouldn't matter. At night, in sheets of horizontal wind...with transformers sparking and timbre cracking, who the hell cares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That thing was odd.   No lightning, or very little by the time the TOR event took place. 

 

I'm up here in Ayer, which as the crow flies was plenty close enough for a SC's pulsing illuminations to be seen.  Yet, I saw nothing...nadda.  Not one flash.

 

I was wondering if the fact that geopotential heights are around 582 to 588, with dm thickness well over 570 might have something to do with it, in that cloud tops were only partially glaciating.  But that's speculation...  I was also wondering if the TOR was a momentum transfer/curl thing, that had less to do with an actual updraft -- can that be identified by rad?  

 

In other words, if there was sufficient downdraft that tugged some of the mid level wind field down, and at less than meso-scale it curled around the hilly topography of Worcester, could that have mimicked a tornadic event??  There is a phenomenon known as "gustnado", which is just that ... when downburst/outflow winds curl into land-spouts, not associated with sustained updraft. 

 

I suppose in the end it wouldn't matter. At night, in sheets of horizontal wind...with transformers sparking and timbre cracking, who the hell cares. 

 

Gustnados are pretty small scale features, probably only detected with a very close mobile radar if you're lucky.

 

The meso wasn't the best I've ever seen, but it was there and had height continuity. Sometimes those local effects are enough to get that circulation to the surface.

 

The ORH area was right on the northern boundary of the highest theta-e air, so it was the right location for a stronger storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was in that carwash of a downpour, as I ascended the Worcester Hills on the MA Pike heading west when the tornado alert sounded, and indeed there was not a flash of lightning in accompaniment. Did see occasional flashes in the Framingham area, but nada thereafter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gustnados are pretty small scale features, probably only detected with a very close mobile radar if you're lucky.

 

The meso wasn't the best I've ever seen, but it was there and had height continuity. Sometimes those local effects are enough to get that circulation to the surface.

 

The ORH area was right on the northern boundary of the highest theta-e air, so it was the right location for a stronger storm.

 

That's interesting...  

 

One thing I noticed is that once the anvil rains passed by us (I think we got .25 to perhaps a third of an 1" up here around Rt 2) is that the temps and DP were above 70.   Was there perhaps even weakly defined warm boundary in play that was offering some SRH to boot?   

 

Yea, if the meso had a vertical representation it's hard to discount that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...