Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

June 1-7 Severe Threat


snowlover2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

According to EuroWX that is run by Andrew Revering, who also is the administrator for F5data, the Euro has really liked central Indiana for tornadic potential for the last 3-4 runs.  Its under the severe tab called APRWX Tornado.  He does have a link that explains that on the EuroWX home page but I can't open it according to my server. I'm sure its to expensive to show all the parameters that go into it, so he has decided on that.  Wished I could see the parameters that he uses. For what's its worth, he didn't like much of a tornado outbreak for today, but tomorrow is another story.

 

Here is a link if you want to try the free trial.

 

http://eurowx.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda cool but you have to click on this link now and select the base reflectivity loop.  I'm guessing the beam is being refracted closer to the ground because of the sharp density differential in the atmosphere just north of Indy, just a guess.  But the wind farms just north of me and up by LAF are vivdly showing up.  Never seen that.  

 

 

http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/nexrad/index.php?type=IND-N0Q-1-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda cool but you have to click on this link now and select the base reflectivity loop.  I'm guessing the beam is being refracted closer to the ground because of the sharp density differential in the atmosphere just north of Indy, just a guess.  But the wind farms just north of me and up by LAF are vivdly showing up.  Never seen that.  

 

 

http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/nexrad/index.php?type=IND-N0Q-1-24

 

I have seen wind farms on radar scans many times over southern MN, not sure how that plays into modeling however, frankly I don't think it does, as the radar will continually show the wind farms, I don't see how they can affect a strong system coming in, unless the resolution of a certain model is 1km or there about.  As of now I don't know of any model that does that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

DAY 1 CONVECTIVE OUTLOOK

NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK

0100 AM CDT WED JUN 04 2014

VALID 041200Z - 051200Z

...THERE IS A SLGT RISK OF SVR TSTMS ACROSS THE OH/TN VALLEY REGION

AND VICINITY...

...THERE IS A SLGT RISK OF SVR TSTMS OVER WRN PORTIONS OF THE PLAINS

STATES FROM THE DAKOTAS TO THE TX/OK PANHANDLE REGION...

...SUMMARY...

STRONG TO SEVERE STORMS ARE EXPECTED TO DEVELOP PRIMARILY THROUGH

THE OHIO/TENNESSEE VALLEY REGION WEDNESDAY WITH A THREAT FOR MAINLY

DAMAGING WIND AND LARGE HAIL...THOUGH A TORNADO THREAT CANNOT BE

RULED OUT. OTHER MORE ISOLATED STRONG TO SEVERE STORMS WILL BE

POSSIBLE OVER WESTERN PORTIONS OF THE PLAINS STATES...FROM THE

DAKOTAS SOUTH TO THE TEXAS PANHANDLE.

...SYNOPSIS...

THE UPPER FLOW PATTERN ACROSS THE U.S. IS FORECAST TO TREND

GRADUALLY TOWARD A QUASI-ZONAL REGIME...AS NUMEROUS SHORT-WAVE

DISTURBANCES SHIFT EWD ACROSS THE COUNTRY SUPPRESSING THE SRN U.S.

RIDGE. AT THE SURFACE...A BAROCLINIC ZONE IS FORECAST TO EVENTUALLY

BECOME ESTABLISHED IN A ROUGHLY W-E FASHION FROM THE KS/OK VICINITY

TO THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION...AS A WEAK SURFACE LOW TRACKS EWD ACROSS

THE OH VALLEY WITH TIME. THIS BOUNDARY -- AND THE UPSLOPE FLOW

REGIME N OF THE FRONT ACROSS THE CENTRAL HIGH PLAINS VICINITY --

WILL FOCUS THE MAIN AREAS OF CONVECTIVE ACTIVITY THIS PERIOD.

...THE OH/TN VALLEY VICINITY...

A RATHER DIFFICULT FORECAST WITH RESPECT TO CONVECTIVE EVOLUTION

ACROSS THE OH VALLEY REGION IS EVIDENT ATTM...AS A VERY LARGE

COMPLEX OF STORMS IS CURRENTLY MOVING SEWD ACROSS THE MID AND LOWER

MO/MID MS VALLEY REGION. THIS COMPLEX OF STORMS -- IN VARIOUS

STAGES OF DECAY WITHIN THE VARIOUS MODEL SOLUTIONS -- WILL LIKELY

RESIDE OVER THE LOWER OH/MID MS VALLEY REGION EARLY IN THE

PERIOD...WITH ANY ONGOING PRECIPITATION AND THE REMNANT CLOUD SHIELD

LIKELY TO AFFECT THE DESTABILIZATION POTENTIAL OF THE DOWNSTREAM

AIRMASS ACROSS THE SLIGHT RISK.

WITH THAT SAID...MODELS GENERALLY AGREE THAT AN AREA SE OF THE MAIN

CONVECTIVE CONTAMINATION -- LIKELY CENTERED ON THE KY VICINITY --

SHOULD DESTABILIZE SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT NEW STORM DEVELOPMENT WILL

OCCUR NEAR A CONVECTIVELY REINFORCED FRONTAL SYSTEM AND

ASSOCIATED/WEAK SURFACE LOW CROSSING THE OH VALLEY REGION. WITH

MODERATELY STRONG/WEAKLY VEERING FLOW WITH HEIGHT TO RESIDE ACROSS

THE AREA...STORMS SHOULD BECOME SEVERE -- WITH LIKELIHOOD FOR

GRADUAL UPSCALE GROWTH FROM CELLULAR TO SMALL-SCALE LINEAR MODE.

RISK FOR HAIL AND DAMAGING WINDS CAN BE EXPECTED ALONG WITH A

TORNADO OR TWO...WITH COVERAGE AND INTENSITY OF THE THREAT MODULATED

TO SOME EXTENT BY DEGREE OF DESTABILIZATION WHICH CAN OCCUR ACROSS

THE AREA.

VARIOUS MODEL RUNS SHOW VARYING CONVECTIVE EVOLUTIONS THROUGH THE

EVENING/OVERNIGHT HOURS...WITH SOME MODELS SPREADING STORMS EWD

ACROSS THE APPALACHIANS AND OTHERS WITH A MORE SWD ADVANCE OF STORMS

INTO THE GULF COAST STATES. IN ANY CASE...SEVERE RISK SHOULD

GRADUALLY DIMINISH LATER IN THE EVENING/OVERNIGHT IN CONJUNCTION

WITH DIURNAL BOUNDARY-LAYER STABILIZATION.

 

post-4544-0-45811500-1401862085_thumb.gi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new day1 pretty much illustrates the worthlessness of the NAM in all seasons beyond the 12-24hr mark.  I say reinstate the old ETA from the early 2000s and ditch the NAM.  The ETA was light years ahead of the POS NAM.

 

EDIT:  Actually I think they should just change the name of the NAM12 to the RAP84.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new day1 pretty much illustrates the worthlessness of the NAM in all seasons beyond the 12-24hr mark.  I say reinstate the old ETA from the early 2000s and ditch the NAM.  The ETA was light years ahead of the POS NAM.

 

EDIT:  Actually I think they should just change the name of the NAM12 to the RAP84.

 

 

Anecdotally it seems that way but the modeling folks will tell you that's not the case (regarding the ETA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. I am shocked by the latest outlook.

 

 

I can understand the logic...they are biting hard on areas farther north not being able to destabilize enough.  These setups with ongoing convection certainly muddle the picture.  Give me a "clean" setup any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About to expire but just saw it.

 

 

 

SEVERE WEATHER STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LINCOLN IL
157 AM CDT WED JUN 4 2014

ILC039-115-147-040715-
/O.CON.KILX.TO.W.0013.000000T0000Z-140604T0715Z/
MACON IL-PIATT IL-DE WITT IL-
157 AM CDT WED JUN 4 2014

...A TORNADO WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FOR SOUTHERN DE WITT...WESTERN
PIATT AND MACON COUNTIES UNTIL 215 AM CDT...

AT 153 AM CDT...A SEVERE SQUALL LINE CAPABLE OF PRODUCING TORNADOES
THAT MAY NOT BE VISIBLE DUE TO HEAVY RAIN WAS LOCATED ALONG A LINE
EXTENDING FROM CLINTON TO FORSYTH TO DECATUR TO BLUE MOUND...AND
MOVING EAST AT 50 MPH. THE PORTION OF THE LINE BETWEEN FORSYTH AND
MAROA IS THE MOST AT RISK FOR TORNADIC ACTIVITY.

HAZARD...TORNADO.

SOURCE...RADAR INDICATED ROTATION.

IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT
SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. DAMAGE
TO ROOFS...WINDOWS AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR. TREE DAMAGE IS
LIKELY.

LOCATIONS IMPACTED INCLUDE...
DECATUR...MONTICELLO...OREANA...ARGENTA...WELDON...MOUNT ZION...LONG
CREEK...CERRO GORDO...DE LAND...BEMENT...CLINTON LAKE DAM...LANE...
ELWIN...DECATUR AIRPORT...DE WITT...OAKLEY...CISCO...HERVEY CITY...
MILMINE AND LA PLACE.

THIS INCLUDES INTERSTATE 72 BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 132 AND 166.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reissued

 

 

 

BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
TORNADO WARNING
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LINCOLN IL
211 AM CDT WED JUN 4 2014

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN LINCOLN HAS ISSUED A

* TORNADO WARNING FOR...
NORTHEASTERN DE WITT COUNTY IN CENTRAL ILLINOIS...
SOUTHEASTERN MCLEAN COUNTY IN CENTRAL ILLINOIS...
PIATT COUNTY IN CENTRAL ILLINOIS...

* UNTIL 230 AM CDT.

* AT 207 AM CDT...A SEVERE SQUALL LINE CAPABLE OF PRODUCING TORNADOES
THAT MAY NOT BE VISIBLE DUE TO HEAVY RAIN WAS LOCATED ALONG A LINE
EXTENDING FROM LE ROY TO WELDON TO 6 MILES SOUTHWEST OF MONTICELLO
TO CERRO GORDO...AND MOVING EAST AT 55 MPH.

HAZARD...TORNADO.

SOURCE...RADAR INDICATED ROTATION.

IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT
SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. DAMAGE
TO ROOFS...WINDOWS AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR. TREE DAMAGE IS
LIKELY.

* LOCATIONS IMPACTED INCLUDE...
MONTICELLO...FARMER CITY...BEMENT...WHITE HEATH...MANSFIELD...
LODGE...GALESVILLE AND BELLFLOWER.

THIS INCLUDES INTERSTATE 72 BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 157 AND 172...AND
THIS INCLUDES INTERSTATE 74 BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 150 AND 167.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

re: the NAM being way too far north...it's a bad model but this was definitely one of the situations where there was no reason to trust it...northern outlier + a general setup that almost always goes south of guidance = toss

 

ended up with like 14 drops of rain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re: the NAM being way too far north...it's a bad model but this was definitely one of the situations where there was no reason to trust it...northern outlier + a general setup that almost always goes south of guidance = toss

ended up with like 14 drops of rain

Last night's 00z NAM had 1.4" of rain for you from 12z to 15z alone today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night's 00z NAM had 1.4" of rain for you from 12z to 15z alone today.

 

 

 

Even the 12z GFS took a fakeout shift north yesterday with the QPF bullseye. When it comes to summer MCS action, I always want to be on the southern end of the target zone and firmy in the warm sector. We do best when complexes ride SE from MSP or so. LOT did a pretty solid job downplaying the thunder chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debating a Midwest storm chase on the way home from KC to Tenn. We will stop in STL to decide over lunch. Hopefully some of the previous convection issues will start to resolve. 4km NAM would say chase. Everything else says just drive home.

Outflow boundary will be in place well to the south of the synoptic warm front. Turning of surface winds, however, won't be as robust on the OFB. Still all models have some speed shear. NAM has sups going in IL/IN but better inflow Indiana only. HRRR says no! Surface winds stay veered and/or storms go too far south into hilly jungle. That said HRRR has somewhat favorable shear vector. Perhaps it is a day to use tried and true methods. Watch surface chart and visible satellite.

I would not chase this on its own. However a more scenic drive home may be in order. After the Nebraska excitement, we just want more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...