Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Spring/ Summer 2014 Convection Discussion


weatherwiz

Recommended Posts

People around my neck of the woods generally are concerned with precipitation, and will definitely hammer on a forecaster for getting that wrong. However, most of the general public would not know if a thunderstorm verified severe if they were standing in the middle of an open field naked during it.

Only weather weenies care about severe verification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Only weather weenies care about severe verification.

And the NWS. Kinda matters for social investigations too. That sorta stuff. In fact, there is a possibility that warnings might be scaled for different regions (low reqts here, more severe reqts out in the Midwest, etc.). You can't improve your system without doing an analysis of its effectiveness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do that and if you base a forecast or expectation on TORCON you have a lot to learn

Lol, maybe back when I was 5... I feel like TWC has been hurting on the good forecasting side in recent years. Even still, I'd rather work with the raw data and learn how to use it than to do whatever someone tells me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the NWS. Kinda matters for social investigations too. That sorta stuff. In fact, there is a possibility that warnings might be scaled for different regions (low reqts here, more severe reqts out in the Midwest, etc.). You can't improve your system without doing an analysis of its effectiveness.

Okay obvously the ones giving out the warnings care about verification scores. I do believe that they tend to warn more frequently in highly populated areas. Often you can look at cells over the plains and think wow if that was here it would probably be the most severe storm we've ever had, and it won't even be warned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay obvously the ones giving out the warnings care about verification scores. I do believe that they tend to warn more frequently in highly populated areas. Often you can look at cells over the plains and think wow if that was here it would probably be the most severe storm we've ever had, and it won't even be warned.

That is actually true, and is addressed in the warning decision training branch's courses. You worry what would happen if you didn't warn a marginal storm that suddenly drops a tornado down in the middle of Boston, for example, but that same storm in, say, the OK panhandle would only gain a little bit of extra attention from forecasters. In fact, they do have to teach forecasters not to focus on one zone! All you NWS guys here, you do a stressful, sometimes thankless job, but man, we'd really be in a rut without you, so thank you guys for what you do! I'm not a weenie... Mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one worry I have is generating enough MLcape to generate robust enough updrafts to really utilize the shear. With poor Mlvl lapse rates it's hard to get good MLcape but the low 70's dews will compensate for that so we just need strong enough sfc heating.

Would like to see values around 1000-1200 J/KG, however, 750 J/KG should sufficice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is actually true, and is addressed in the warning decision training branch's courses. You worry what would happen if you didn't warn a marginal storm that suddenly drops a tornado down in the middle of Boston, for example, but that same storm in, say, the OK panhandle would only gain a little bit of extra attention from forecasters. In fact, they do have to teach forecasters not to focus on one zone! All you NWS guys here, you do a stressful, sometimes thankless job, but man, we'd really be in a rut without you, so thank you guys for what you do! I'm not a weenie... Mostly.

Was the Springfield, MA cell tornado warned when it dropped the EF2 a few years back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one worry I have is generating enough MLcape to generate robust enough updrafts to really utilize the shear. With poor Mlvl lapse rates it's hard to get good MLcape but the low 70's dews will compensate for that so we just need strong enough sfc heating.

Would like to see values around 1000-1200 J/KG, however, 750 J/KG should sufficice

OKX 12z sounding had a good amount of MUCAPE

 

OKX.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who in the general public cares if the winds maxed out at 50 MPH and the severe didn't verify? You're also forgetting that 99% of the general public has no idea what the severe criteria is.

People seem to be affected a great deal more by lack of verification than actual verification. If they didn't see it, it didn't happen. That's why storm based warnings were a masterstroke on the NWS' part.

SPC has a 2% for area for the Hudson valley to ORH and south to NYC, then 30% wind south of that. Seems to me that suggests we might be a bit more, shall I say discreet, with our thunderstorms. Remember, Springfield happened on a 5% day, so does the tor fcst really matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some very strong wording was just put out down here

 

SPECIAL WEATHER STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MOUNT HOLLY NJ
930 AM EDT TUE JUL 15 2014

DEZ001-002-MDZ008-012-015-019-020-NJZ001-007>010-012-015-PAZ054-
055-060>062-070-071-101>106-151530-
NEW CASTLE-KENT-CECIL-KENT MD-QUEEN ANNES-TALBOT-CAROLINE-SUSSEX-
WARREN-MORRIS-HUNTERDON-SOMERSET-MIDDLESEX-MERCER-CARBON-MONROE-
BERKS-LEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON-DELAWARE-PHILADELPHIA-WESTERN CHESTER-
EASTERN CHESTER-WESTERN MONTGOMERY-EASTERN MONTGOMERY-UPPER BUCKS-
LOWER BUCKS-
INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...WILMINGTON...DOVER...ELKTON...
CHESTERTOWN...CENTREVILLE...EASTON...DENTON...NEWTON...
WASHINGTON...MORRISTOWN...FLEMINGTON...SOMERVILLE...
NEW BRUNSWICK...TRENTON...JIM THORPE...STROUDSBURG...READING...
ALLENTOWN...BETHLEHEM...MEDIA...PHILADELPHIA...HONEY BROOK...
OXFORD...WEST CHESTER...KENNETT SQUARE...COLLEGEVILLE...
POTTSTOWN...NORRISTOWN...LANSDALE...CHALFONT...PERKASIE...
MORRISVILLE...DOYLESTOWN
930 AM EDT TUE JUL 15 2014

...SWATHS OF HIGH IMPACT DAMAGING THUNDERSTORMS WITH FLASH FLOODING
EXPECTED LATER TODAY OR THIS EVENING...

THE PRIMARY LINES OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS SHOULD DEVELOP IN NEAR
90 DEGREE HEAT OVER EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA BETWEEN 1 PM AND 3 PM AND
THEN MOVE INTO THE INTERSTATE 95 CORRIDOR BETWEEN 4 PM AND 8 PM.

THESE STORMS ARE LIKELY TO BE STRONGER THAN YESTERDAY WITH POTENTIAL
FOR MORE EXTENSIVE AND GREATER DAMAGE.

RAINFALL OF 1 TO 2 INCHES WITHIN ONE HOUR WOULD PROMOTE POCKETS OF
RENEWED FLASH FLOODING IN URBANIZED AREAS. THERE IS THE POTENTIAL
FOR MORE EXTENSIVE SMALL STREAM FLOODING THAN WHAT OCCURRED
YESTERDAY...ESPECIALLY IF STORMS REPEATEDLY ROLL THROUGH AN AREA
FOR 2 HOURS AND PRODUCE 4 TO 5 INCH AMOUNTS.

THOSE LIVING IN OR TRAVELING THROUGH EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND THE
INTERSTATE 95 CORRIDOR FROM NEW BRUNSWICK TO TRENTON...PHILADELPHIA
AND WILMINGTON INTO NORTHEAST MARYLAND SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR DANGEROUS
THUNDERSTORMS LATE TODAY. THESE STORMS WILL FORCE TRAVEL DELAYS IN
SOME AREAS AND POTENTIALLY CAUSE ROAD CLOSURES.

POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY LIGHTNING AND TREE DAMAGE COULD BE EXTENSIVE.

THE RISK FOR STRONGEST THUNDERSTORMS WILL DIMINISH AFTER 10 PM.

HAVE YOUR SAFETY PLAN IN MIND WHEN WARNINGS ARE ISSUED.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some very strong wording was just put out down here

SPECIAL WEATHER STATEMENT

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MOUNT HOLLY NJ

930 AM EDT TUE JUL 15 2014

DEZ001-002-MDZ008-012-015-019-020-NJZ001-007>010-012-015-PAZ054-

055-060>062-070-071-101>106-151530-

NEW CASTLE-KENT-CECIL-KENT MD-QUEEN ANNES-TALBOT-CAROLINE-SUSSEX-

WARREN-MORRIS-HUNTERDON-SOMERSET-MIDDLESEX-MERCER-CARBON-MONROE-

BERKS-LEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON-DELAWARE-PHILADELPHIA-WESTERN CHESTER-

EASTERN CHESTER-WESTERN MONTGOMERY-EASTERN MONTGOMERY-UPPER BUCKS-

LOWER BUCKS-

INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...WILMINGTON...DOVER...ELKTON...

CHESTERTOWN...CENTREVILLE...EASTON...DENTON...NEWTON...

WASHINGTON...MORRISTOWN...FLEMINGTON...SOMERVILLE...

NEW BRUNSWICK...TRENTON...JIM THORPE...STROUDSBURG...READING...

ALLENTOWN...BETHLEHEM...MEDIA...PHILADELPHIA...HONEY BROOK...

OXFORD...WEST CHESTER...KENNETT SQUARE...COLLEGEVILLE...

POTTSTOWN...NORRISTOWN...LANSDALE...CHALFONT...PERKASIE...

MORRISVILLE...DOYLESTOWN

930 AM EDT TUE JUL 15 2014

...SWATHS OF HIGH IMPACT DAMAGING THUNDERSTORMS WITH FLASH FLOODING

EXPECTED LATER TODAY OR THIS EVENING...

THE PRIMARY LINES OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS SHOULD DEVELOP IN NEAR

90 DEGREE HEAT OVER EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA BETWEEN 1 PM AND 3 PM AND

THEN MOVE INTO THE INTERSTATE 95 CORRIDOR BETWEEN 4 PM AND 8 PM.

THESE STORMS ARE LIKELY TO BE STRONGER THAN YESTERDAY WITH POTENTIAL

FOR MORE EXTENSIVE AND GREATER DAMAGE.

RAINFALL OF 1 TO 2 INCHES WITHIN ONE HOUR WOULD PROMOTE POCKETS OF

RENEWED FLASH FLOODING IN URBANIZED AREAS. THERE IS THE POTENTIAL

FOR MORE EXTENSIVE SMALL STREAM FLOODING THAN WHAT OCCURRED

YESTERDAY...ESPECIALLY IF STORMS REPEATEDLY ROLL THROUGH AN AREA

FOR 2 HOURS AND PRODUCE 4 TO 5 INCH AMOUNTS.

THOSE LIVING IN OR TRAVELING THROUGH EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND THE

INTERSTATE 95 CORRIDOR FROM NEW BRUNSWICK TO TRENTON...PHILADELPHIA

AND WILMINGTON INTO NORTHEAST MARYLAND SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR DANGEROUS

THUNDERSTORMS LATE TODAY. THESE STORMS WILL FORCE TRAVEL DELAYS IN

SOME AREAS AND POTENTIALLY CAUSE ROAD CLOSURES.

POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY LIGHTNING AND TREE DAMAGE COULD BE EXTENSIVE.

THE RISK FOR STRONGEST THUNDERSTORMS WILL DIMINISH AFTER 10 PM.

HAVE YOUR SAFETY PLAN IN MIND WHEN WARNINGS ARE ISSUED.

Sounds like they expect a derecho/major ff event. Turn around don't drown didn't turn up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...