Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

0Z Guidance Discussion 12/20/2010


Dr No

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Are you being sarcastic? No 500mb map from two models is going to look identical, but the major features are in relatively the same position on both maps....

i agree, the differences from the 84 hr panel arent that drastic, the overall setup is the same..Shortwave digging to China, heights building in the midwest, Pac low off the coast.... all is good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you being sarcastic? No 500mb map from two models is going to look identical, but the major features are in relatively the same position on both maps....

Nobody claimed identical. The height field over the east coast and the wavelength of the central US ridge are vastly different....even for a 3.5 day lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it have such a different solution simply since it is the 84 hour nam?

I don't get into "stereotyping" models, when they're run, or other generalizations....it always boils down to some physical process that a model sees or doesn't see, to create such diverse outputs at such lead times. There are many setups where such outputs would be reasonably similar at these leads, and then you have this pattern where many shortwaves are circling/interacting around a closed h500 low, and ejecting into a pattern that is sensitive to minute pertabations.....thus run to run and model to model inconsistencies/differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...