wolfie09 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Model diagnosis CYCLOGENESIS OVER THE NORTHEAST GULF OF MEXICO LATE MON......RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING SURFACE LOW OFF THE SOUTHEAST/MID-ATLANTICSTATES BY TUES...PREFERENCE: BLEND OF THE 12Z GFS/12Z GEM GLOBAL AND 00Z ECENS MEANCONFIDENCE: BELOW AVERAGETHE UPR PATTERN BEGINS TO STRONGLY AMPLIFY ENTERING THE BEGINNINGOF NEXT WEEK WITH A LARGE POSITIVE HEIGHT ANOMALY SETTING UPACROSS THE WESTERN U.S. AND AN INCREASINGLY AMPLIFIED EASTERN U.S.LONGWAVE TROUGH WHICH WILL BE ENHANCED BY THE DIGGING OF AWELL-DEFINED SHORTWAVE TROUGH WHICH WILL RACE FROM THE DAKOTASSEWD INTO THE OH/TN VALLEYS BY EARLY TUES. THIS FEATURE IS OFSIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE AS IT ALLOWS FOR THE LARGER SCALE TROUGHAPPROACHING THE EAST COAST TO BEGIN TAKING ON ANEGATIVE-TILT...AND IT WILL BE INTERACTING WITH A STRONG FRONTALZONE OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO AND JUST OFFSHORE THE SOUTHEASTCOASTLINE. THE GUIDANCE SHOWS SIGNIFICANT CYCLOGENESISOCCURRING...WITH LOW PRESSURE INITIALLY DEVELOPING OVER THE NERNGULF OF MEXICO AND THEN INTENSIFYING RAPIDLY OFF THE SOUTHEAST ANDMID-ATLANTIC COASTS ON TUES.THE LATEST NAM DEPICTS AN ELONGATED BUT NEGATIVELY TILTED TROUGHBY TUES STRETCHING FROM THE GRT LAKES REGION DOWN TO THEMID-ATLANTIC STATES...BUT TENDS TO BE SLOWER WITH THE NRN PORTIONOF THE TROUGH AXIS. IT IS QUITE ENERGETIC WITH IS SHORTWAVEDYNAMICS CROSSING THE OH VLY AND CNTRL APPALACHIANS AND SO MUCH SOTHAT IS PLACES A RATHER DOMINANT AREA OF LOW PRESSURE OVER THE OHVLY...WHILE SUGGESTING CONSIDERABLY MORE MODEST CYCLOGENESIS OVERTHE NERN GULF OF MEXICO AND OFFSHORE THE EAST COAST BY COMPARISON.THE 12Z GFS/12Z ECMWF/12Z GEM GLOBAL AND 12Z UKMET SHOW MUCH LESSEMPHASIS ON AN OH VLY LOW AND SUPPORT CONSIDERABLE CYCLOGENESISJUST OFF THE SOUTHEAST COAST BY EARLY TUES...AND WITH RAPIDINTENSIFICATION TO OFFSHORE THE MID-ATLANTIC BY WED. THE 12Z GFSIS QUICKER WITH THE LOW CENTER OFF THE EAST COAST COMPARED TO THE12Z ECMWF...BUT WITH RESPECT TO TIMING THE 12Z UKMET AND 12Z GEMGLOBAL ARE TRENDING TWD A SOMEWHAT FASTER SOLN LIKE THE GFS. THE12Z UKMET IS THE DEEPEST SOLN OVERALL AND TRACKS ITS LOW CENTERFARTHEST LEFT...WHICH HAS VIRTUALLY NO ENSEMBLE SUPPORT ATTM. THE12Z GEM GLOBAL IS A LITTLE WEAKER THAN THE 12Z UKMET...FOLLOWEDTHEN BY THE 12Z GFS AND 12Z ECMWF. IT WAS NOTICED THOUGH THAT THE12Z GFS MAY BE SUFFERING FROM SOME DEGREE OF FEEDBACK NEAR THEMID-ATLANTIC COAST ON TUES...WHICH HAS SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR ITSQPF DISTRIBUTION...BUT ITS MASS FIELDS OTHERWISE SEEM REASONABLE.THE STRONGEST MODEL CLUSTERING AT THIS POINT NOW TENDS TO FAVORTHE 12Z GFS/12Z GEM GLOBAL AND 00Z ECENS MEAN...WITH THEDETERMINISTIC ECMWF APPEARING TOO SLOW AND PROBABLY TOO FARSOUTHEAST OFF THE EAST COAST ON TUES. THE 12Z GEFS MEAN FAVORS THEMORE PROGRESSIVE CAMP GFS-LED CAMP. THEREFORE...BASED ON THELATEST TRENDS AND MODEL CLUSTERING...WILL PREFER A BLEND OF THE12Z GFS/12Z GEM GLOBAL AND 00Z ECENS MEAN...HOWEVER CONFIDENCEWILL REMAIN LIMITED. http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/pmdhmd.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 If it's snowing lightly or even moderate in the middle of the day it will not accumulate..come on,we have seen so many March and April storms..if there is heavy snow it's a different story..probably most of the snow that accumulates on the Euro is from late afternoon and night..it's March 25th Euro had .55" of precip AFTER 8pm and only .09" before 8pm. For KLGA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Part of the problem here is that the mid-level centers are closing off just a tad late for our area. You can see here the hour 81 panel of the 12z GFS and the 850mb low just now closing off. You would want this to happen 6-12 hours sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 There were a few positives today at 12z. The GEFS GGEM EURO all sneak .5 into KNYC and .75 just to the east across long island. The GGEM is only 0.3" at the park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanksfan Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 A quote from a well respected Met: "Yeah but even a monkey can figure out that the European model surface depiction is completely wrong. Sometimes people say that to be weenies, but I'm telling you it is more obvious than Marilyn Monroe having an affair with JFK." Bobby Martrich Chief Meteorologist for EPAWA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Still, if you follow the upper level wind structure on the GFS, this shows why it's tracking from near OBX to just SE of the benchmark. Despite the winds being more north to south the isobars are more SW to NE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 A quote from a well respected Met: "Yeah but even a monkey can figure out that the European model surface depiction is completely wrong. Sometimes people say that to be weenies, but I'm telling you it is more obvious than Marilyn Monroe having an affair with JFK." Bobby Martrich Chief Meteorologist for EPAWA. I tend to agree that the Euro is a bit wacky, but FYI, he's not a met. At least, not a degreed one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 The GGEM is only 0.3" at the park..Yeah, but it's 10-15mm for Queens and Brooklyn. .40"-.60" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 . Yeah, but it's 10-15mm for Queens and Brooklyn. .40"-.60" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I tend to agree that the Euro is a bit wacky, but FYI, he's not a met. At least, not a degreed one. Can you call yourself a meteorologist w/o a degree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Can you call yourself a meteorologist w/o a degree? Lol apparently u can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanksfan Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Still, if you follow the upper level wind structure on the GFS, this shows why it's tracking from near OBX to just SE of the benchmark. Despite the winds being more north to south the isobars are more SW to NE. I read on another forum that a met stated that the 12z EURO and GFS both suffered from convective feedback issues, due to the new info starting to be picked up by the models, and the complex dynamics of the storm itself. He said the low should have developed closer to the coast and to toss them both. Ride the ensembles for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Reilly Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I tend to agree that the Euro is a bit wacky, but FYI, he's not a met. At least, not a degreed one. Agreed .... Bobby is not a Met a nice guy though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Hpc is saying feedback on the gfs and euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelocita Weather Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Looks like model consensus today is 2-4" ne nj, 3-6" NYC and w li, 5-10" c and e li Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I read on another forum that a met stated that the 12z EURO and GFS both suffered from convective feedback issues, due to the new info starting to be picked up by the models, and the complex dynamics of the storm itself. He said the low should have developed closer to the coast near OBX, and to toss them both. Ride the ensembles for now. Not sure about the GFS but the Euro looked very funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+SNfreak21 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I don't know if anyone mentioned this, UKMET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDMK6GLI Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I don't know if anyone mentioned this, but UKMET destroys us, closed off H5That looks amazing! Being the ukmet im hesitant to believe that, however the EURO suffering from what looks like from what i hears convective feedback the ensembles will be very important here folks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanksfan Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I don't know if anyone mentioned this, but UKMET destroys us, closed off H5 I strongly feel if not for the strange surface depiction of the 12z Euro, it would of shown something very similar to this. Very eager to see the EURO ensembles. Got a good feeling its going to be west of the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GD0815 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 I don't know if anyone mentioned this, UKMET per the model discussion at the top of this page, dismissed as an outlier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Can you call yourself a meteorologist w/o a degree? Can you disprove UFO's and Ghosts without a scientific study? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Very little change so far on the Euro ensemble mean. At 72 hours the spread is from the SC coast all the way to the Bahamas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Euro ensemble mean is identical to the 00z ensemble mean run regarding track and a hair drier on the western side. Sub 980mb low well east of the BM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 There were a few positives today at 12z. The GEFS GGEM EURO all sneak .5 into KNYC and .75 just to the east across long island. I wouldn't have expect thermal profiles to be followed so closely 96 hours out but it's part of the process. A late march winter event looks to b shaping up from NYC east. Not every storm is a blizzard although a foot of snow for someone on this board isn't out of the question as Suffolk County is close If the BL cooperates We can settle that inside 48 hours. For now. There was NO shift east as the models held the 0z euro serve. Now here comes the but. Not a lot of room for error here. Between surface temps with lighter rates and the chance ths still goes east. But as a whole. 12z didnt blow up . So you have to take it. Finer details can be worked out but closer to the coast is prob where you Wana be for this one. Even if the BL looks marginal today. Middlesex and Union are extremely close to NYC, so I wouldn't say that. I thjink most models show accumulating snow making it to eastern Jersey. Western Jersey is a different story. Usually, with nor'easters, the precip gradient sets up from SE to NW (perpendicular to the NE path of the storm), which means that areas to the SW of NYC, along the NJ TPK, will tend to get very similar precip amounts as NYC (although as one heads NE along the I-95 line, precip will increase as the storm is intensiftying as it moves NE, so more precip is falling, in general). Could be one of those storms with a pretty steep NW to SE gradient, i.e., 2" in Newton, 4" in Parsippany, 6" in Newark, and 8" in the Rockaways. Could be a similar gradient line to the SE of that line, i.e., 1" in Stroudsburg (PA), 3" in Chester, 5" in Woodbridge and 7" in Asbury Park. And any precip that falls after about 5 pm will be largely unaffected by the indirect sunlight and perhaps the first 1/4" of snow will be melted in cooling down the ground to 32F and snow will accumulate easily after that, assuming air temps are around 32F and not 35-36F (sounds like they'll be around freezing by late in the afternoon). We won't need a fast snowfall rate to overcome melting rates once the sun has lost its power after about 5 pm. Earlier than that, as I discussed in an earlier post, melting rates increase with every hour towards midday, up to probably about 3/8"-1/2" per hour, meaning one needs at least moderate snowfall between maybe 11 am and 3 pm to get accumulation. But it sounds like little precip will fall during the high melting rate daytime period. Still need a better track to get more snow falling in the first place... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 The mean looks well west of the op. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcad1 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 New England forum says the euro ensemble mean maybe a tad west of 0z!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Can you disprove UFO's and Ghosts without a scientific study? Given the public interest, I really favor licensing for meteorologists. If you need licensing to cut hair or give a massage ( the real kind ) you ought to need one to forecast weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 The GGEM is only 0.3" at the park. Thought the Canadian ensembles were .5 at the park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Usually, with nor'easters, the precip gradient sets up from SE to NW (perpendicular to the NE path of the storm), which means that areas to the SW of NYC, along the NJ TPK, will tend to get very similar precip amounts as NYC (although as one heads NE along the I-95 line, precip will increase as the storm is intensiftying as it moves NE, so more precip is falling, in general). Could be one of those storms with a pretty steep NW to SE gradient, i.e., 2" in Newton, 4" in Parsippany, 6" in Newark, and 8" in the Rockaways. Could be a similar gradient line to the SE of that line, i.e., 1" in Stroudsburg (PA), 3" in Chester, 5" in Woodbridge and 7" in Asbury Park. And any precip that falls after about 5 pm will be largely unaffected by the indirect sunlight and perhaps the first 1/4" of snow will be melted in cooling down the ground to 32F and snow will accumulate easily after that, assuming air temps are around 32F and not 35-36F (sounds like they'll be around freezing by late in the afternoon). We won't need a fast snowfall rate to overcome melting rates once the sun has lost its power after about 5 pm. Earlier than that, as I discussed in an earlier post, melting rates increase with every hour towards midday, up to probably about 3/8"-1/2" per hour, meaning one needs at least moderate snowfall between maybe 11 am and 3 pm to get accumulation. But it sounds like little precip will fall during the high melting rate daytime period. Still need a better track to get more snow falling in the first place... Good discussion. I think we had 7 inches last March during the day that was down to 5 inches by the end of the storm, and mostly gone the next day. it was earlier in March too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Thought the Canadian ensembles were .5 at the park .65 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.