Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Do We have one More in Us?


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, sounds as if it held serve more than anything.

 

 

Pretty close, though it def pinched the precip gradient a bit. Its a really small movement but it matters verbatim since 20 miles is a big difference between 8" and 3" in this storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The high res nam loop really illustrates the differences well.  Watch it develop the low way offshore with the convection and really have a tough time getting the significant precip west.  It's really the difference in an hour or three for it to get pulled further west and subsequently the whole thing develop/blossom more like the wetter solutions.    Thing is most of this year has featured slower developing/delayed.

 

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fnam-hires%2F12%2Fnam-hires_namer_033_1000_500_thick.gif&model=nam-hires&area=namer&storm=&cycle=12&param=1000_500_thick&fhr=033&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20140324+12+UTC&ps=area&scrollx=0&scrolly=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The changes at 500 were in the + IMO through hr 36. I'm just getting around to looking at other stuff and there were some improvements believe it or not.

 

Would you say that because the east low was actually further west this run, it allowed it to capture the west low sooner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The changes at 500 were in the + IMO through hr 36. I'm just getting around to looking at other stuff and there were some improvements believe it or not.

 

 

Yeah it did look good at 24-36...I actually thought it would come west a tad...I guess we'll just have to wait and see how things evolve in the final 12 hours before precip onset.

 

 

I still think it won't be THAT big of a deal west of PYM-EWB...but it could still be a moderate storm akin to 2/15 this year...like a 4-6 inch type deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty close, though it def pinched the precip gradient a bit. Its a really small movement but it matters verbatim since 20 miles is a big difference between 8" and 3" in this storm.

h85 is nearly identical, some of the vorticity is focusing further east compared to previous runs, however, the overall h85 track is extremely similar to previous runs. Overall some more consolidation rather compared to previously.

 

7h is arguably all around better than previous.

 

5h looking earlier in the run did seem to dig the trof more, but overall look is slightly flatter so the difference in the digging becomes negligible. I like the slower look overall because I think the only potential scenario for this to deliver is improved timing of the interaction of these shortwaves. 5h actually looks closer than it did @ 0z.

 

What I take out of having the chance to actually sit down and look at the past two euro runs is that they are overall pretty damn similar. Be careful looking at purely qpf fields here. some of the mid level tracks actually improved on this euro run while the qpf printout may have shifted east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

h85 is nearly identical, some of the vorticity is focusing further east compared to previous runs, however, the overall h85 track is extremely similar to previous runs. Overall some more consolidation rather compared to previously.

 

7h is arguably all around better than previous.

 

5h looking earlier in the run did seem to dig the trof more, but overall look is slightly flatter so the difference in the digging becomes negligible. I like the slower look overall because I think the only potential scenario for this to deliver is improved timing of the interaction of these shortwaves. 5h actually looks closer than it did @ 0z.

 

What I take out of having the chance to actually sit down and look at the past two euro runs is that they are overall pretty damn similar. Be careful looking at purely qpf fields here. some of the mid level tracks actually improved on this euro run while the qpf printout may have shifted east.

 

 

The mid-level lift shifted slightly east...it wasn't a qpf phantom.

 

Early on it was decent, but later it wasn't quite as good. But these small shifts are not necessarily significant in terms of the actual storm evolution since they are orders of magnitude smaller than the mean model error at this time range.

 

 

But thanks for telling the inventor of the term "QPF Queen" not to only look at QPF. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looking at Euro...

 

Western most low does reach slightly more NW, but eastern low pivots it out pretty quickly and you have a consolidated low by 12z Wed.

 

Trough looked a little better through 30hr... small nudge in the right direction, but I wonder if all this is moot relative to Phil's point. 

 

If convection at the best baroclinicity is the key driver of the speed/intensity of eastern-most low, you wonder if this can trend even further east as we get closer. 12z models shifty, don't feel like we have a good handle of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mid-level lift shifted slightly east...it wasn't a qpf phantom.

 

Early on it was decent, but later it wasn't quite as good. But these small shifts are not necessarily significant in terms of the actual storm evolution since they are orders of magnitude smaller than the mean model error at this time range.

 

 

But thanks for telling the inventor of the term "QPF Queen" not to only look at QPF. :lol:

Come on, nowhere in there did I direct it at anyone in particular... Amateur Andy who lurks in the shadows might not know otherwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looking at Euro...

 

Western most low does reach slightly more NW, but eastern low pivots it out pretty quickly and you have a consolidated low by 12z Wed.

 

Trough looked a little better through 30hr... small nudge in the right direction, but I wonder if all this is moot relative to Phil's point. 

 

If convection at the best baroclinicity is the key driver of the speed/intensity of eastern-most low, you wonder if this can trend even further east as we get closer. 12z models shifty, don't feel like we have a good handle of this.

 

 

It ends up potentially feeding on itself and could create some significant shifts east - or turn out to be the sticking point in the model presentations to date.  We'll see soon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned a few days ago the 2/15 comparison, and someone mentioned it again today. Seems like that could be pretty close. That's pretty much what the euro shows, maybe more prolific amounts on the outer cape however

If only we could get the last minute shift west this time instead of east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See that laughing ol' smiley face at the end of his post...  that is Happy Jolly Will...

 

The cutoff for this is going to be sick, as has been mentioned for several days

Doctor Data himself, nah I didn't take it the wrong way. It sucks how easily emotion is misinterpreted online.

 

GEM really focused everything on the western low @12z, that's why we saw such vast improvements. (forgive me I am catching up)

 

Like 55-60 knot sustained on ACK :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...