Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Do We have one More in Us?


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I get where you're coming from but the variability in solutions has become accepted as part of what the Euro does nowadays. I remember a day when the Euro would be very consistent and had a literal deadly range within 96 hours or so when it would rarely budge from its solution. Those days are long gone.

 

Part of it is a product of the pattern too. Some models perform well in patterns 4 days out some don't. I agree it hasn't been the illustrious model everyone claims it is..but the fact of the matter is model error bars for operational models 96 hrs or whatever out are pretty high. We hold models like the euro to high standards because of events like Sandy, but shame on you if you think operational models nail storms over 5 days out. When it comes down to the critical time for operational forecasters, it's usually the best with QPF and thermal profiles. That's all most people care about when it comes to forecasting....it's the period under 72 hrs..esp under 48hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing as you all asked and care so much about my opinions on matters ... ehem.

 

I don't think this was a horrible finish to winter, at all. 

 

Why?

 

Because for me, the futility of 'hoping for snow', whether for the interest of seeing 'just how deep can the pack get', the sensation of perpetuity when pattern persistence locks down the region ... and the storms themselves, all of it, enters futility for me pretty quickly after the 15th of February, and just about absolutely by the ides of March.  If anything the last 30 days was favored in my mind because... at some point, the objective observation that seasons don't last forever must somehow get a voice in the chorus of reasoning here.  

 

Granted, some years get a protracted snow storm, ...or two, or even three.  But I think you will find those to be the rarer seasons. It's best to adjust one's expectations accordingly ...then, should the vagarious fortunes of the wind be kind, instead the orgastic surprise actually seems divine.

 

I really wish a lot of you guys had a lust for summer, because it makes the warm up next week end, at least for me, coveted and liked.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of it is a product of the pattern too. Some models perform well in patterns 4 days out some don't. I agree it hasn't been the illustrious model everyone claims it is..but the fact of the matter is model error bars for operational models 96 hrs or whatever out are pretty high. We hold models like the euro to high standards because of events like Sandy, but shame on you if you think operational models nail storms over 5 days out. When it comes down to the critical time for operational forecasters, it's usually the best with QPF and thermal profiles. That's all most people care about when it comes to forecasting....it's the period under 72 hrs..esp under 48hrs.

 

I agree with you, but even inside of 72 hours the model has become less reliable at least in my experience over the past two years or so. That's not to argue that the GFS or NAM are better, because that's entirely other debate of massive sh*T show proportions.

 

Regarding this storm I think the idea that the Euro was way off at any point is pretty silly. The ensemble mean track of the low pressure system at 144 hours is almost dead-nuts to what the model is showing today, the only difference being the low pressure is deeper and a tick farther west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro has been pretty horrible now for 2-3 years...its tendency to evolve slowly to a changing forecast has made it look very bad this winter because we've had so many radical changes inside 4 days and the Euro takes 3 runs to respond.

BS,every single high impact storm it has done well, maybe you forget Jan 11 Sandy Irene Feb 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread itself may be award worthy. This could be the first 50+ page thread for an event where most see next to nothing in the boards existence.

18z rgem is brutal too

That is a ridiculous statement. We have had 2 or 3 in the last 30 days.

Edit: OK maybe not this bad in the last 30 days. But these threads have existed before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't posted much today for various reasons, but Snowgoose did think the euro would move east last night so good call by him. I personally wanted one more model run to verify this euro solution last night and make sure it wasn't out to lunch, but 12z said no go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you, but even inside of 72 hours the model has become less reliable at least in my experience over the past two years or so. That's not to argue that the GFS or NAM are better, because that's entirely other debate of massive sh*T show proportions.

Regarding this storm I think the idea that the Euro was way off at any point is pretty silly. The ensemble mean track of the low pressure system at 144 hours is almost dead-nuts to what the model is showing today, the only difference being the low pressure is deeper and a tick farther west.

Anyone who understands models knows this John. Good post
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing as you all asked and care so much about my opinions on matters ... ehem.

I don't think this was a horrible finish to winter, at all.

Why?

Because for me, the futility of 'hoping for snow', whether for the interest of seeing 'just how deep can the pack get', the sensation of perpetuity when pattern persistence locks down the region ... and the storms themselves, all of it, enters futility for me pretty quickly after the 15th of February, and just about absolutely by the ides of March. If anything the last 30 days was favored in my mind because... at some point, the objective observation that seasons don't last forever must somehow get a voice in the chorus of reasoning here.

Granted, some years get a protracted snow storm, ...or two, or even three. But I think you will find those to be the rarer seasons. It's best to adjust one's expectations accordingly ...then, should the vagarious fortunes of the wind be kind, instead the orgastic surprise actually seems divine.

I really wish a lot of you guys had a lust for summer, because it makes the warm up next week end, at least for me, coveted and liked.

Everyone here is ready now to move on to summer. Once you hit late Morch and April it's over. But the issue is it's boring season . No one wants to talk about sunny dry days with winds gusting to 25 mph and red flag warnings. Warm weather season is very boring when we don't have high dews and tstorms and folks that enjoy weather aren't going to have anything to post about. So we hang onto any snow threats and look for ways they can still happen. There's a reason why the warm wx thread you started hasn't illicitled any discussion. It's just not exciting to weather folks. Most of us hate spring with a passion. It's far and away the worst time of year and this year the cold lurking to north and the -Nao showing now in days 11-15 mean we have days and days of backdoor hell. So as the last snow of the season occurs on Wed .. We are going to lose the fun and energy and many posters will disappear until we get severe and dews or a cane in Sept.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread itself may be award worthy. This could be the first 50+ page thread for an event where most see next to nothing in the boards existence.

18z rgem is brutal too

 

 

Meh, not really ... I mean, I get you, but this was sort of an unfair, untenable situation. We are actually at a point in tech history where we can ...maybe the best word is "quasi" depend on a D 3.5 solution. 

 

The key to being 80 % of the way there, over a 100 occurrence, the bear's going to get you. The rub?  there's no real way to know if a given event is going to be a lemon sucker, or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spiked football's bouncing around like ping pong balls at a Chinese table tennis tourney.Whats amazing is virtually only one or two peeps thought huge storm yet some here have the need for ego boosting to point out how smart and correct they were. Meh. And as far as PV s comment on thread length, well a 960 within 100 miles of the BM deserves in depth discussion. Final outcomes apparently are sealed congrats to all who thought there would be a huge near historical storm near us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone here is ready now to move on to summer. Once you hit late Morch and April it's over. But the issue is it's boring season . No one wants to talk about sunny dry days with winds gusting to 25 mph and red flag warnings. Warm weather season is very boring when we don't have high dews and tstorms and folks that enjoy weather aren't going to have anything to post about. So we hang onto any snow threats and look for ways they can still happen. There's a reason why the warm wx thread you started hasn't illicitled any discussion. It's just not exciting to weather folks. Most of us hate spring with a passion. It's far and away the worst time of year and this year the cold lurking to north and the -Nao showing now in days 11-15 mean we have days and days of backdoor hell. So as the last snow of the season occurs on Wed .. We are going to lose the fun and energy and many posters will disappear until we get severe and dews or a cane in Sept.

 

 

In a rare show of sapient lucidity ... Kevin shines!  

 

j/k dude.  Seriously, I agree that April is futile, bu for an entirely different reason.  Now ... we get to look forward to the sting of back-door cold vomit from off the Labrador Current -- particularly during an ensuing spring that is launching off the coldest New England SSTs in decades. 

 

Nice...  I hope I'm out at hole 9 when the 40F air fists in like Tyson during the pre-cannibal years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may need to revise this after the 18z GFS :axe:

000

FXUS61 KBOX 232009

AFDBOX

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAUNTON MA

409 PM EDT SUN MAR 23 2014

.LONG TERM /TUESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY/...

*/ HIGHLIGHTS...

- STRONG OFFSHORE STORM TUESDAY INTO WEDNESDAY WITH SNOW/WIND

- SEASONABLE AND DRY FOR THURSDAY WITH HIGH PRESSURE

- MILDER WITH RAIN SOMETIME FRIDAY THROUGH SATURDAY

- BRIEFLY COLD BEFORE TURNING MILDER SUNDAY INTO NEXT WEEK

*/ OVERVIEW AND MODEL PREFERENCE...

MAIN FOCUS IS ON THE TUESDAY NIGHT INTO WEDNESDAY SIGNIFICANT AND

POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS OCEAN STORM. THOUGH 12Z GUIDANCE HAS COME

INTO BETTER AGREEMENT...VARIANCE CONTINUES SO MUCH SO THAT THE

WOBBLE OF SOLUTIONS YIELDS SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES FOR SE NEW ENGLAND.

JUST A 50 MILE CHANGE IN TRACK CAN MAKE ALL THE DIFFERENCE.

A VERY DIFFICULT AND CHALLENGING FORECAST...AND JUST TRYING TO

CONVEY BOTH THOUGHTS AND UNCERTAINTY IS IN AND OF ITSELF A

CHALLENGE. HAVE DONE THE BEST TO CONVEY THINKING BASED ON SIGNALS

AND MODEL CONSENSUS WHILE WEIGHTING WITH CIPS ANALOGS. BROKE DOWN

THE DISCUSSION TO CLEARLY CONVEY THE MESSAGE OF POTENTIAL THREATS

AND IMPACTS. IT MAY BE A BIT TOO LONG BUT FEEL ITS IMPORTANT TO

DELIVER THE MESSAGE WITH SUCH AND IMPRESSIVE STORM.

MODERATE CONFIDENCE ALL-AROUND CONTINUES WITH THE HIGHEST OVER SE

NEW ENGLAND INCLUDING CAPE COD AND THE ISLANDS WHERE THE GREATEST OF

IMPACTS IS EXPECTED. DID GIVE SOME HIGHER WEIGHTING TO THE 12Z

GFS/CANADIAN/ECMWF AS THEY FELL CLOSER TO THE GFS/ECMWF ENSEMBLES.

AGAIN...NO ONE SOLUTION IS PREFERRED.

*/ OFFSHORE STORM...

TUESDAY INTO WEDNESDAY...

E-CONUS BROAD-SCALE TROUGHING IS AMPLIFIED BY A ROBUST SHORTWAVE

CYCLONICALLY DIGGING S OUT OF CANADA TUESDAY INVOKING A NEGATIVE-

TILT THAT CLOSES OFF OVER THE GULF OF MAINE WEDNESDAY. INTERACTING

WITH A SURFACE FRONTAL-ZONE ACROSS THE GULF OF MEXICO...AN AREA OF

LOW PRES DEVELOPS OFF THE CAROLINAS ON TUESDAY...DEEPENING NE AND

PASSING SE OF THE 40N/70W BENCHMARK AROUND MIDNIGHT WEDNESDAY...

BOMBING OUT AND UNDERGOING OCCLUSION ACROSS THE GULF OF MAINE INTO

HALIFAX DOWN TO A CENTRAL PRES OF 960-970 MB WEDNESDAY NIGHT. SUCH A

STORM OF 3-4 STANDARD DEVIATIONS IN TERMS OF STRENGTH AND MAGNITUDE

POSES A SERIOUS THREAT TO SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND.

ABSOLUTELY NO CERTAINTY WITH THIS FORECAST AS TO EXACT SPECIFICS.

CONTINUED SPREAD OF OUTCOMES PER 12Z FORECAST GUIDANCE IN BOTH LOW

TRACK...STRENGTH...AND POSITION LIKELY DUE TO DIFFERENCES IN TIMING

AND AMPLITUDE OF UPSTREAM ENERGY TOWARDS THE EVOLUTION OF THE MID-

TO UPPER-LEVEL NEGATIVE-TILT OF THE TROUGH...DESPITE BETTER

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ECMWF/GFS/CANADIAN. WOBBLES-VARIANCE ARE

ALSO APPARENT WITHIN INDIVIDUAL FORECAST GUIDANCE. SUCH SLIGHT

DIFFERENCES CAN EQUATE TO ROUGHLY A 50 MILE SHIFT IN THE LOW TRACK

MAKING ALL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND NEARLY

NEXT TO NOTHING.

FEEL WE CAN MAKE EDUCATED-GUESSES PER CONSISTENT SIGNAL OF BOTH

DETERMINISTIC AND ENSEMBLE SOLUTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THE ANTICIPATED

OFFSHORE STORM. PER SYNOPSIS DISCUSSION ABOVE...BELIEVE THE LOW WILL

PASS SE OF THE 40N/70W BENCHMARK AROUND MIDNIGHT WEDNESDAY...BOMBING

OUT OVER THE GULF OF MAINE INTO EASTERN HALIFAX WEDNESDAY. THUS HAVE

HIGHEST CONFIDENCE OF IMPACTS ACROSS THE CAPE AND ISLANDS INCLUDING

ADJACENT WATERS...WITH LESSER CONFIDENCE N AND W.

WILL CONTINUE YESTERDAYS FORECAST THEME FOCUSING ON THE POTENTIAL

WHAT/WHERE/WHEN OF IMPACTS BASED ON COLLABORATION BETWEEN THOUGHTS

ABOVE...LATEST FORECAST GUIDANCE AND SIGNALS...AND FINALLY CIPS

ANALOGS.

*/HEAVY SNOW...

SYNOPSIS...COMBINATION OF SW-NE SNOW-BANDING TO THE NW-QUADRANT OF

THE SURFACE LOW /PER TROWALING AND DEFORMATION/ WITH AN ISALLOBARIC/

AGEOSTROPHIC COMPONENT FROM THE INTERIOR WILL LIKELY MAKE FOR A

SHARP NW-SE GRADIENT OF SNOWFALL.

TIMING: TUESDAY NIGHT TOWARDS MIDDAY WEDNESDAY.

IMPACTS:

- SNOW WILL BE HEAVY AT TIMES RESULTING IN HAZARDOUS TRAVELING

CONDITIONS AS WELL AS VISIBILITIES DOWN TO A QUARTER MILE OR LESS

FOR FAR E/SE CAPE COD AND NANTUCKET. BLOWING AND DRIFTING OF SNOW

MAY BE AN ISSUE AS WELL.

CONFIDENCE:

- WINTER STORM WARNINGS POSSIBLE FOR CAPE COD AND THE ISLANDS...

PERHAPS INTO SOUTHEAST PLYMOUTH COUNTY. WINTER WEATHER ADVISORIES

FOR E/SE MA AND E/SE RI. MODERATE CONFIDENCE.

- BLIZZARD CONDITIONS POSSIBLE...ESPECIALLY FOR BETWEEN HYANNIS AND

CHATHAM ON THE EASTERN CAPE...AND NANTUCKET. LOW CONFIDENCE.

- CIPS ANALOGS IN GOOD AGREEMENT WITH LATEST SNOWFALL PROBABILITIES

WITH THE HIGHEST PROBABILITY OF MEETING/EXCEEDING WARNING CRITERIA

OVER FAR SE NEW ENGLAND.

*/STRONG TO DAMAGING WINDS...

SYNOPSIS...BOMBING LOW AND STRONG PRESSURE FALLS LENDS TO A SURFACE

LOW PRESSURE CENTER OF 960-970 MB OVER THE GULF OF MAINE TOWARDS

HALIFAX AROUND WHICH NORTHERLY WINDS WILL AMPLIFY ROUGHLY 3-4

STANDARD DEVIATIONS /ANOMALOUS/ THROUGH A WELL-MIXED BOUNDARY LAYER.

TIMING: TUESDAY NIGHT INTO WEDNESDAY NIGHT.

IMPACTS:

- NORTHERLY WIND GUSTS OF 45 TO 60 MPH WILL RESULT IN DOWNED TREE

LIMBS AND POWER LINES. STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WILL ALSO BE POSSIBLE.

ISOLATED TO SCATTERED POWER OUTAGES.

- WINDS WILL ALSO AID IN THE BLOWING AND DRIFTING OF SNOW AND

POSSIBLY MAKE FOR BLIZZARD CONDITIONS OUT ON THE FAR EASTERN CAPE AS

WELL AS NANTUCKET..

- WORST OF THE WINDS WILL BE ALONG NORTH-FACING EXPOSED SHORELINES

SUCH AS CAPE ANN...CAPE COD...AND NANTUCKET.

CONFIDENCE:

- HIGH WIND WARNINGS MAY BE NEEDED FOR FAR EASTERN CAPE COD AND

NANTUCKET WITH WIND GUSTS OF AT LEAST 58 MPH. MODERATE CONFIDENCE.

- WIND ADVISORIES MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOCATIONS ALONG THE E-SHORE SUCH

AS CAPE ANN AND DOWN THROUGH SE MA WITH GUSTS OF AT LEAST 45 MPH.

MODERATE CONFIDENCE.

- GALE WARNINGS LIKELY FOR ALL WATERS WITH WINDS IN EXCESS OF 34 KTS

WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF STORM WARNINGS FOR THE E/SE OUTER WATERS AND

BOTH CAPE COD BAY AND NANTUCKET SOUND WITH WINDS IN EXCESS OF 48 KTS.

- CIPS ANALOGS HIGHLIGHT THE GREATEST PROBABILITY OF WINDS GREATER

THAN 45 MPH OVER SE NEW ENGLAND. LOCAL IN-HOUSE CLIMATOLOGY AFTER

EVALUATING UPPER-LEVEL WINDS SUPPORTS POTENTIAL HAZARDS AND HEAD-

LINES OUTLINED ABOVE.

*/COASTAL IMPACTS...

TIMING: WEDNESDAY MORNING HIGH TIDE NEAR 8 AM.

IMPACTS:

- COMBINED WITH WINDS AND PERHAPS A 1-2 FOOT SURGE...THERE IS THE

POTENTIAL FOR SPLASHOVER AND MINOR COASTAL FLOODING...ESPECIALLY FOR

EXPOSED NORTH-FACING SHORELINES.

CONFIDENCE:

- COASTAL FLOOD HEADLINES MAY BE NEED FOR THE NORTH-FACING

SHORELINES SUCH AS CAPE ANN...WITHIN CAPE COD BAY...AND NANTUCKET.

MODERATE CONFIDENCE.

- WAVE HEIGHTS OF 15 TO 20 FEET POSSIBLE ON THE E/SE WATERS.

MODERATE CONFIDENCE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that isn't fair at all. I did very well with both are big storms last year and within the critical point of some of our storms this year including March 12-13.

 

It absolutely nailed that March 12-13 event up here...from like 90 hours out it was rock steady when the GFS and NAM and others were trying to go more south.  The ECM even in the long range had that event as an Upstate and NNE big snowstorm.  Sure it waffled back and forth a little bit but for the most part, it kept putting the direct hit in the same area until the other models finally ticked north in the final 36 hours or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...