Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,911
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ianlian7
    Newest Member
    Ianlian7
    Joined

Do We have one More in Us?


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  On 3/24/2014 at 5:38 PM, phil882 said:

This should be the image that captures the biggest issue with this system right now. The uncertainty HAS NOT decreased much in the last 2-4 days. This is because most of the uncertainty is driven by convective processes which haven't yet taken place. I was trying to key on a shortwave feature ejecting out of NW Canada, but truth be told, the uncertainty is really being driven by this shortwave interacting with the strong baroclinicity downstream in the eastern US. This is why we are seeing a double barrel low situation, where one sea level pressure minima is driven by the dynamics and the other driven by the explosion of convection expected in the 24-48 hour range.

 

The problem is that convective processes in the global models are still parameterized and are likely helping to increase the uncertainty between the different model agencies.  

 

100% right on.   Clearly we're seeing a real struggle in how this all plays out.  As always it's a real deal it's not raw feedback but there are issues with how models will handle the convective processes and that immediately plays out in the development location and intensity at 48-60.

 

The Euro ENS mean was 60-75 miles east of the op but there was decent clustering to the west.  Seems safe to assume some movement towards the ens mean track from last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/24/2014 at 5:38 PM, phil882 said:

This should be the image that captures the biggest issue with this system right now. The uncertainty HAS NOT decreased much in the last 2-4 days. This is because most of the uncertainty is driven by convective processes which haven't yet taken place. I was trying to key on a shortwave feature ejecting out of NW Canada, but truth be told, the uncertainty is really being driven by this shortwave interacting with the strong baroclinicity downstream in the eastern US. This is why we are seeing a double barrel low situation, where one sea level pressure minima is driven by the dynamics and the other driven by the explosion of convection expected in the 24-48 hour range.

 

The problem is that convective processes in the global models are still parameterized and are likely helping to increase the uncertainty between the different model agencies.  

I made this post in the NYC sub-forum and it was dismissed faster than the Pope at a Muslim convention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/24/2014 at 5:57 PM, PolarVortex said:

The clicking you hear is everyone hitting refresh for the next panel of the Euro

 

Haha, right there with ya.

 

Out 30 hours seems to be a tad west with precip as trough digs just slightly more. Trough digs more, but doesn't go quite as negative, therefore resulting in a more easterly track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/24/2014 at 5:59 PM, TheSnowman said:

I have tabs that can go back and forth on my phones browser and have the last 4 EURO runs saved.  

 

And yes the clicking you hear is everyone hitting F5.   Or the Circle button.   

 

I don't have access to the early look.

 

I'd rather see a stronger/faster redevelopment off the Carolinas than a consolidated low.  Consolidated will be further east and much more like the others than the 0z last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/24/2014 at 6:02 PM, CoastalWx said:

Through 18z Wed 0.75 to the canal. 0.5 to my house 0.25 to Ray. 1" HYA.

 

 

Finals thru 00z Thu...a little more for Cape:

 

 

1.5" for ACK to CHH, 1" to canal, 0.75" to PYM to Wareham, all the others unchanged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/24/2014 at 6:07 PM, ORH_wxman said:

Finals thru 00z Thu...a little more for Cape:

 

 

1.5" for ACK to CHH, 1" to canal, 0.75" to PYM to Wareham, all the others unchanged.

 

That's still pretty extreme and almost hard to believe, but we'll see.  I would think that puts it as a top late March storm for most of the Cape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...