Random Chaos Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/DGEXEAST_18z/dgexloop.html Hrs 90 to 126 Yep, looks like ~30mm, then ~70mm, then tail end is steep, but could give us another ~20-50mm depending on location. That's 100-150mm. 100mm = 3.9" 150mm = 5.9" GFS isn't anything close to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Anyone have the 18z RGEM @ 54 hrs? Its on meteocentre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Whats hurting this is all the energy on the backside of the shortwave, forces it to keep digging southward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Yep, looks like ~30mm, then ~70mm, then tail end is steep, but could give us another ~20-50mm depending on location. That's 100-150mm. 100mm = 3.9" 150mm = 5.9" GFS isn't anything close to that. QPF is in inches, not mm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Anyone have the 18z RGEM @ 54 hrs? http://meteocentre.com/models/models.php?lang=en&map=na&mod=gemreg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I'm with you. 3-5" is perfectly acceptable, worth the track, and would be thrilled if it verifies. It's a fluke setup with perfect timing. Expecting a fluke monster is a but much. Good point. The strong cutoff secondary piece is well overplayed on the DGEX. It would be an anomalous event to see the second piece bomb into a classic nor'easter. First piece with good front running thump is the best shot. Perfect timing yields 3-6 and mainly west of 95. Initially there may be some warmer air in the BL if earlier start time is realized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Good point. The strong cutoff secondary piece is well overplayed on the DGEX. It would be an anomalous event to see the second piece bomb into a classic nor'easter. First piece with good front running thump is the best shot. Perfect timing yields 3-6 and mainly west of 95. Initially there may be some warmer air in the BL if earlier start time is realized. The cutoff coming up favorably is in the back of my mind. There are hints of it but cutoffs behave a little nutty on models as time goes on. We'll see how things look on Saturday. Maybe we score the fluke of the century. I wouldn't bet 10-1 odds on it right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 The cutoff coming up favorably is in the back of my mind. There are hints of it but cutoffs behave a little nutty on models as time goes on. We'll see how things look on Saturday. Maybe we score the fluke of the century. I wouldn't bet 10-1 odds on it right now. recall 3/1/09 had the decent u/l come thru early in the morning that gave us a decent shot, 2"+/- after the slp's 4"+/- but some of the models have the trailer as a decent event all on its own ....fun few days coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 recall 3/1/09 had the decent u/l come thru early in the morning that gave us a decent shot, 2"+/- after the slp's 4"+/- but some of the models have the trailer as a decent event all on its own ....fun few days coming The euro ens mean precip panels show potential for a 1-2 punch. Looking at member output there are some in the mix where the initial comes in from hr 84-96 or so then a lull and back into precip from 108-126. I don't feel like figuring out how many show a 2 phase event but there are enough showing the possibility to keep it in the back of the mind. I need 8" to hit 50" on the year. Would be pretty wild doing it in mid march. We'll see how it goes. ULL's are always fun any time of year. Nothing like a cold pool of spinning air 18k up. The dynamic nature of the precip is entertaining to say the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 recall 3/1/09 had the decent u/l come thru early in the morning that gave us a decent shot, 2"+/- after the slp's 4"+/- but some of the models have the trailer as a decent event all on its own ....fun few days coming I was thinking about that a little while ago. I got 9" during that event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxMan1 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Euro control is ok. 6-8" for most of us. Has accum snow south of RIC too so that's a good sign for temps (even with the flawed algorithm). I know it's been a while since this was posted, but I'd thought I'd chime in. I haven't seen the deterministic EC snow amounts, but I will say, don't be fooled by the accumulations south of RIC if they are noted west of I95. Now, if they are noted east of the fall line, then we've got a great thermal signal. As we realized from the 3/6 and 3/25 events last year, in marginal BL to 850 mb temp cases, higher terrain areas west of 95 (fall line) down by RIC latitude can do just as well or better than those of us east of I95 between DC and Balt. At least IMBY here in northern AA county, I'm going to be very careful with the forecasts with this one. Folks were improperly over-emphasizing the 3/6/2013 analog prior to the much colder 3/25 event, or even during colder earlier season events this year. However, for this event, at least the way it looks now, temps would be a legitimate concern for DC-Balt and areas east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I know it's been a while since this was posted, but I'd thought I'd chime in. I haven't seen the deterministic EC snow amounts, but I will say, don't be fooled by the accumulations south of RIC if they are noted west of I95. Now, if they are noted east of the fall line, then we've got a great thermal signal. As we realized from the 3/6 and 3/25 events last year, in marginal BL to 850 mb temp cases, higher terrain areas west of 95 (fall line) down by RIC latitude can do just as well or better than those of us east of I95 between DC and Balt. At least IMBY here in northern AA county, I'm going to be very careful with the forecasts with this one. Folks were improperly over-emphasizing the 3/6/2013 analog prior to the much colder 3/25 event, or even during colder earlier season events this year. However, for this event, at least the way it looks now, temps would be a legitimate concern for DC-Balt and areas east. climo says we should be concerned, but right now the models paint a different picture, at least for BWI on the Euro, 6Z Monday surface is -.9C and the 18Z GFS (top link) and NAM (bottom link) maps below for Monday 6Z also say there's nothing to worry about http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?fhr=084ℑ=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_084_10m_wnd_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer¶m=10m_wnd_precip&group=Model+Guidance&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20140313+18+UTC&imageSize=M&ps=model http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?fhr=084ℑ=data%2Fnam%2F18%2Fnam_namer_084_10m_wnd_precip.gif&model=nam&area=namer¶m=10m_wnd_precip&group=Model+Guidance&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20140313+18+UTC&imageSize=M&ps=model idk, climo is certainly important, but no one can deny this winter has been different wrt to boundary layer temps and the pattern just keeps repeating so I guess I'm saying, seasonal pattern says surface temps on models as now progged can be believed imho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 WxMan, I agree that bl could be a big problem for some folks. Me included. My post about wiggle room was midlevels but I wasn't specific. Seeing the models push the 850 line down as far as va/nc is a good thing. The period from onset through at least midnight(prob later) is going to have some issues. I could see the first inch or 2 fall with 0:1 ratios. Lol Hopefully if the front running slug does in fact hit us pretty good that the heaviest falls after 2am. This is definitely a better setup than the early march storm last year irt to temps. We could have a pretty decent period of snow fall with temps several degrees below freezing. Fun storm to track Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 Surface forecasts are really tricky until the day of. With the -10c in central PA I have to believe it's a decent airmass with plenty of CAD. SE of DC can always have problems though. Can't really start worrying until we get closer in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 climo says we should be concerned, but right now the models paint a different picture, at least for BWI on the Euro, 6Z Monday surface is -.9C and the 18Z GFS (top link) and NAM (bottom link) maps below for Monday 6Z also say there's nothing to worry about http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?fhr=084ℑ=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_084_10m_wnd_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer¶m=10m_wnd_precip&group=Model+Guidance&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20140313+18+UTC&imageSize=M&ps=model http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?fhr=084ℑ=data%2Fnam%2F18%2Fnam_namer_084_10m_wnd_precip.gif&model=nam&area=namer¶m=10m_wnd_precip&group=Model+Guidance&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20140313+18+UTC&imageSize=M&ps=model idk, climo is certainly important, but no one can deny this winter has been different wrt to boundary layer temps and the pattern just keeps repeating so I guess I'm saying, seasonal pattern says surface temps on models as now progged can be believed imho But there were more than a couple cases this winter too where the models were too cold in the short term for the boundary layer and surface temps. Even 1/21 was a pretty big bust temp-wise for the city in the beginning phase of the storm, let alone 12/10 and 2/3. Even the warmer model outputs for 12/10 and 2/3 still showed more accumulating verbatim (or falling snow at all in the case of 2/3) than what verified. It's just that we scored so many times, those examples don't sting as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxMan1 Posted March 13, 2014 Share Posted March 13, 2014 It certainly is a fun storm to track! Especially after this winter -- everything past March 1st continues to be added icing on the cake. This will be even more fun to track than the 3/25 event last year. Some of us were desperate for a 3+ inch event that it sorta took away from the enjoyment late last season. Now, as I said, it's all bonus! :-) WxMan, I agree that bl could be a big problem for some folks. Me included. My post about wiggle room was midlevels but I wasn't specific. Seeing the models push the 850 line down as far as va/nc is a good thing. The period from onset through at least midnight(prob later) is going to have some issues. I could see the first inch or 2 fall with 0:1 ratios. Lol Hopefully if the front running slug does in fact hit us pretty good that the heaviest falls after 2am. This is definitely a better setup than the early march storm last year irt to temps. We could have a pretty decent period of snow fall with temps several degrees below freezing. Fun storm to track Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 What's climo anymore? I had accumulating snow on October 26 a few years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 But there were more than a couple cases this winter too where the models were too cold in the short term for the boundary layer and surface temps. Even 1/21 was a pretty big bust temp-wise for the city in the beginning phase of the storm, let alone 12/10 and 2/3. Even the warmer model outputs for 12/10 and 2/3 still showed more accumulating verbatim (or falling snow at all in the case of 2/3) than what verified. It's just that we scored so many times, those examples don't sting as much. Agreed. There were multiple times this winter that the models (Euro, GFS, and NAM in particular) were all a little too cold in the BL. The 00z RGEM and 00z GGEM the night before the early March storm advertised the latest changeover of all the models (4-5 am) which turned out to be right. If the models are spitting out -1C 850 temp, I'd worry that would turn out to be 0 to +1 (and so forth throughout the column), thus delaying our changeover, yadda yadda. I think we need to hedge our expectations with climo and the "cold-bias" the models have been showing this winter. OTOH, this winter has been anomolous with the cold shots so the models could be right this time. Still 60+ hours out so small changes will have a big impact on the type of precip we see. Pretty cool that we're still tracking snowstorms in mid-March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 This is a very legit air mass with a very favorable high position/wind direction at the surface and looks like the heaviest snow falls before daylight. Very different from our march busts. I wouldn't be surprised if the models sniff out more cold air damning and trend colder across VA as we get closer to the event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Agreed. There were multiple times this winter that the models (Euro, GFS, and NAM in particular) were all a little too cold in the BL. The 00z RGEM and 00z GGEM the night before the early March storm advertised the latest changeover of all the models (4-5 am) which turned out to be right. If the models are spitting out -1C 850 temp, I'd worry that would turn out to be 0 to +1 (and so forth throughout the column), thus delaying our changeover, yadda yadda. I think we need to hedge our expectations with climo and the "cold-bias" the models have been showing this winter. OTOH, this winter has been anomolous with the cold shots so the models could be right this time. Still 60+ hours out so small changes will have a big impact on the type of precip we see. Pretty cool that we're still tracking snowstorms in mid-March. Good post and same to those who above discussed the same thing. Will be interesting re the GGEM for now, since its the GGEM showing the most snow. Will it be right this go around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 21z SREFs def colder in the long range... hr 72 already has 850s below 0 at DCA... 0c 850 line is nearby to the SE rest of run but slowly slips SEward by 84 and 87 2m 0c line comes through around 4am or so Mon morning 24 hr QPF has 1" contour off to our SW, but somewhat nearby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 21z SREFs def colder in the long range... hr 72 already has 850s below 0 at DCA... 0c 850 line is nearby to the SE rest of run but slowly slips SEward by 84 and 87 2m 0c line comes through around 4am or so Mon morning 24 hr QPF has 1" contour off to our SW, but somewhat nearby Man it looks wet by mon morning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Man it looks wet by mon morning More like snow I know its a different system, but don't forget the SREFs took forever to move the 0c line south in the 3/3 storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I like the early NAM trends, farther west with energy in Texas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 More like snow I know its a different system, but don't forget the SREFs took forever to move the 0c line south in the 3/3 storm Yeah, I meant QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 But there were more than a couple cases this winter too where the models were too cold in the short term for the boundary layer and surface temps. Even 1/21 was a pretty big bust temp-wise for the city in the beginning phase of the storm, let alone 12/10 and 2/3. Even the warmer model outputs for 12/10 and 2/3 still showed more accumulating verbatim (or falling snow at all in the case of 2/3) than what verified. It's just that we scored so many times, those examples don't sting as much. I was talking about BWI we didn't have the temp busts this year that DCA had this year, and every year for that matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 NAM looks really good...This might be a crushing run for DC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Nam looks pretty damn good. EDIT. Ninja'd by hizen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowsonWeather Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I'm sure I'll live to regret these words, but I do believe we are about to get NAM'd. #weenieanalysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillyBlizzard17 Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Really juiced up at hr 60 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.