Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Saint Patrick's Day Snow Event


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

.5 to .6 is good in Jan but its meh in march. Not worth the trouble if we cant get an inch of qpf or more

 

Yea, the run is good and bad. A little later and colder but weaker and less qpf. I think surface freezing @ 8am through the cities is suspect but that's before the better rates. 2-5" for most of us imo on the the run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BWI

MON 00Z 17-MAR   0.1    -4.6    1022      64      98    0.02     554     537    MON 06Z 17-MAR  -4.3    -5.7    1020      95      99    0.32     553     537    MON 12Z 17-MAR  -6.6    -5.9    1018      94      98    0.10     550     536    MON 18Z 17-MAR  -4.6    -6.1    1018      91     100    0.10     549     535    TUE 00Z 18-MAR  -4.3    -5.4    1018      94      30    0.01     551     536    

DCA

MON 00Z 17-MAR  -0.1    -4.2    1021      77      98    0.06     555     538    MON 06Z 17-MAR  -3.3    -4.9    1020      96      99    0.38     553     538    MON 12Z 17-MAR  -6.3    -5.4    1018      95      98    0.07     551     537    MON 18Z 17-MAR  -4.4    -5.4    1018      92      99    0.09     550     536    TUE 00Z 18-MAR  -4.1    -4.8    1018      96      33    0.02     552     537    
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am guessing between evaporative cooling and air mas intrusion we can get into the 32-34 range by 9-10pm....forget about DCA...doesnt really matter if they are 36 if me and you are 33...

 

Understandable... 1-3/2-4 is pretty much the limit on the GFS for us anyway... so we should just take that and run I suppose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yoda...latest MOS is 40 degrees at 8pm

I like to split the difference between MOS and the raw numbers, as it tends to underestimate the more anomalous air masses. The cold blast two nights ago was the latest instance where temps ended up closer to the raw guidance.

The airmass for this storm doesn't look too crazy, but it's still quite impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to split the difference between MOS and the raw numbers, as it tends to underestimate the more anomalous air masses. The cold blast last night was the latest instance where temps ended up closer to the raw guidance.

The airmass for this storm doesn't look too crazy, but it's still quite impressive.

 

yes...I don't think it will be 40 degrees at 8pm....unless we end up hitting 50 late afternoon...hopefully the combo of cooling and penetrating air mass will be enough to give accumulating snow to everyone mid evening to early morning...those that can get 6-8 hours of thump could do pretty well....I could also see this completely busting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see 0.7" by  3-4am

 

 

There's quite a jackpot in wva. 1.25+/-. It's not really an upslope event either. I know we are a bit further from the 850/slp so there's that in play. But seeing such consistency with a pretty wet solution so close by leads me to believe the upside is real here and not fantasy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes...I don't think it will be 40 degrees at 8pm....unless we end up hitting 50 late afternoon...hopefully the combo of cooling and penetrating air mass will be enough to give accumulating snow to everyone mid evening to early morning...those that can get 6-8 hours of thump could do pretty well....I could also see this completely busting

Thanks for the input. Yeah I'm usually bearish on snow in mid-March...almost anything can go wrong.

That said, I felt the same way before 3/27/13, and ended up with 2.5" covering all surfaces including a busy street. This airmass is similar to that one..so I don't know what to think yet. I think if we can get this to fall at night we have a good shot at grass/deck accums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what your point is- so you're saying we should discard all records before the 1920's? That requires an additional argument, such as you believing climate change has taken away the possibility of it, the records aren't accurate, etc.

 

In the 130 years since measurements began in 1883, there have been 6 years in which there have been a total of more than 2 inches of snow in the entire month of April in Baltimore, and no such years within the last 70 years. Based on data alone, not mere belief, therefore, "significant" snowfalls into the first half of April in Baltimore are extremely rare (once every 22 years on average at the most, and that's only if you first count anything over 2 inches as significant and if there were not multiple smaller snowfalls in a few of those years) and increasingly non-existent (0 times in the last 70 years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...