ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I totally agree. I wish we could have more computing power to do both. Because the RAP and HRRR are great, and particularly when it comes to convection and convective ensemble products. I know we scoff at severe in New England, but for the forecasters to our west, that stuff is a huge improvement in guidance. Its also basically why they punted the NAM synoptic ability I feel like....they really improved the NAM's convection performance, but it seems to have come at the expense of synoptics...at least in the winter up here. But in all honesty...given that the NAM is a mesoscale model, and the severe in the plains is more important than winter storms up here, I can see why the sacrifice was made. It is worth it in the scheme of things even if we don't like it in our backyards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 If I'm seeing it correctly, it looks like the srefs would get a couple inches too powderfreak lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Its also basically why they punted the NAM synoptic ability I feel like....they really improved the NAM's convection performance, but it seems to have come at the expense of synoptics...at least in the winter up here. But in all honesty...given that the NAM is a mesoscale model, and the severe in the plains is more important than winter storms up here, I can see why the sacrifice was made. It is worth it in the scheme of things even if we don't like it in our backyards. Exactly, weather is all relative. This board is hyper sensitive to IMBY weather, but even us mets can fall into the IMBYism when it comes to New England or the Northeast. For example, we've mentioned the Euro hasn't been its usual killer self this winter, but on the global scale it's been crushing all other guidance. Sometimes it's hard to the see the forest for trees in your local area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I've heard the op Euro will be going down to 10 km soon (in the next two years). They have bought two new supercomputers for 15 times our current computing power over here. It would be funny if the better resolution resulted in NAM like solutions. it probably would not happen knowing the data and assimilation scheme, but for the amount they charge...it better have good results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Exactly, weather is all relative. This board is hyper sensitive to IMBY weather, but even us mets can fall into the IMBYism when it comes to New England or the Northeast. For example, we've mentioned the Euro hasn't been its usual killer self this winter, but on the global scale it's been crushing all other guidance. Sometimes it's hard to the see the forest for trees in your local area. We have places in Japan and up in Hokkaido that have similar coastal storms such as we do and the euro is good with thermal profiles there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 It would be funny if the better resolution resulted in NAM like solutions. it probably would not happen knowing the data and assimilation scheme, but for the amount they charge...it better have good results. I find it funny that the higher ups get bonuses based on beating the GFS. Then again, we are mostly tracked on improvement on the GFS (especially in aviation). So that's job security right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Why do the Israelis need 7 km? To forecast sunny vs hazy vs rain in winter? And srefs/nam/CMC blow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Hrrr has made bounds of improvement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Why do the Israelis need 7 km? To forecast sunny vs hazy vs rain in winter? And srefs/nam/CMC blow. Israel has a lot of micro climates and topography is huge there. Global models weren't doing a good job with the more coarse resolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I find it funny that the higher ups get bonuses based on beating the GFS. Then again, we are mostly tracked on improvement on the GFS (especially in aviation). So that's job security right there. Wow bonuses? Jeez. Didn't know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Ya think these are a tad overdone? LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 It would be funny if the better resolution resulted in NAM like solutions. it probably would not happen knowing the data and assimilation scheme, but for the amount they charge...it better have good results. As long as the Euro remains hydrostatic, I don't think you'll see nam solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Wow bonuses? Jeez. Didn't know that. High fives all over Reading, England when they heard our new Sandy supercomputer isn't close to being purchased yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 As long as the Euro remains hydrostatic, I don't think you'll see nam solutions. That's a good point. Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Ya think these are a tad overdone? LOL. f87.gif Already 40% for over 8" in spots over SNE...lol. What a joke. The worst was right before this last storm, literally 24 hours lead time, they had over 50% for 8"+ at ORH, almost all from the backlash/ULL stuff. That's just brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 14, 2014 Author Share Posted March 14, 2014 Israel has a lot of micro climates and topography is huge there. Global models weren't doing a good job with the more coarse resolution. That's actually essentially bullshiat. Their govt loves to piz away $$. I've been in all the micros enough to know that the only issue is water which I would think current technology works for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I don't think the 12z run is going to be quite as ridiculous as the 06z run of the NAM. Still pretty decent looking though at 48h. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 That's actually essentially bullshiat. Their govt loves to piz away $$. I've been in all the micros enough to know that the only issue is water which I would think current technology works for. It might be, I don't know...that's what I was told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Even though it's quite positively tilted, NAM is keeping the energy more consolidated which is absolutely key. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Forky knows his stuff, and makes valid points, but the pleasure that he takes in dissapointing snow and cold enthusiasts is palpable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 I don't think the 12z run is going to be quite as ridiculous as the 06z run of the NAM. Still pretty decent looking though at 48h. Watch that lobe rotating S of Hudson Bay. Agree, looks ok thus far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruinsyear Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 My dark sky weather app had 15-20" for Monday lol, it's now backing off showing 9-15" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 NAM looks great thru 66h. Focusing on trailer ULL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Ya think these are a tad overdone? LOL. I'll take NMB6 please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 The one thing I wish we could change is that fast flow over the nrn Rockies. Would be nice for more amplitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruinsyear Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 My dark sky's weather app was calling for 15-20", backing down to 9-15" lol. I posted a screenshot on fb and people were all up in arms about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 NAM looks great thru 66h. Focusing on trailer ULL. Well scratch that thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 The spread in the 6z GEFS members was huge. From monster snowstorm to not even cirrus. This storm is really struggling with predictability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Forky knows his stuff, and makes valid points, but the pleasure that he takes in dissapointing snow and cold enthusiasts is palpable.thats how i see it too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 Kind of a scraper this run (better for SE MA/RI/S CT)....but we're really getting into territory on the NAM not even worth discussing. I'm mostly looking inside of 48h to see how that energy is handled out of the rockies. Hopefully RGEM keeps it more consolidated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.