HoarfrostHubb Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Good lesson as to why past does not equal future. Are you specifically referring to the disaster last week? lol Yeah, 2 completely different things. I initially though this thing would slide to the east and maybe scrape. I though the PV would be pushing more W to E and would muscle this over. I was not thinking supression south Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 The hope in SNE is that the sw comes in stronger and the back end snow is more dynamic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Nice to see the 6z GEFS cooler. That's a big hit from here to dryslot. They're always cooler. I'd be worried about a mix up into S VT and NH..of course you guys will have plenty of snow..but it's likely not done coming NW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 The hope in SNE is that the sw comes in stronger and the back end snow is more dynamic. As of now there's not much backend snow anywhere in SNE unless you're up in N and NW Mass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 As of now there's not much backend snow anywhere in SNE unless you're up in N and NW MassYup, that's why it's the hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice Warrior commander Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Mood flakes out there now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 They're always cooler. I'd be worried about a mix up into S VT and NH..of course you guys will have plenty of snow..but it's likely not done coming NWThey're not always cooler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 They're not always cooler. I thought Scooter said they were. My bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Nice to see the 6z GEFS cooler. That's a big hit from here to dryslot. Makes the OP run a little more suspect,We will see how today's runs go, I think we still see some ticks along the way and in a positive direction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 gyx seems to be going pretty early on the start time. CON snowing by Wed morning it would appear, but the heavy comes late afternoon and at night. does that seem right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 FWIW, Looks like GEFS tracks the low from LI to ACK There are a lot more amped members than there were at 00z... no idea what the mean looks like but the individuals seem much further north than the 00z individuals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Box playing the data-sparse-Pacific card heavily: As the parent system was still over the Pacific at the time of initial conditions...insufficient confidence to move to categorical probability of precipitation. Instead we have held at high-end likely...68 to 74 percent. The parent system moves ashore this morning...and so one wouldexpect confidence to increase during the day....This analysis is of course based on the 00z models...and as noted earlier this could change as the parent system moves into the North American weather balloon domain. A headline may eventually be needed when forecast confidence increases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 I thought Scooter said they were. My bad I said most of the time in these setups they are SE of the ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Box playing the data-sparse-Pacific card heavily: As the parent system was still over the Pacific at the time of initial conditions...insufficient confidence to move to categorical probability of precipitation. Instead we have held at high-end likely...68 to 74 percent. The parent system moves ashore this morning...and so one would expect confidence to increase during the day. ... This analysis is of course based on the 00z models...and as noted earlier this could change as the parent system moves into the North American weather balloon domain. A headline may eventually be needed when forecast confidence increases. Overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 i savored my flurries and snow grains this morning walking the dogs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Overrated.agreed, sounds better than it really is like a used car salesman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Overrated. Help me Obi-Wan-not-sampled, you're our only hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 I thought Scooter said they were. My badUsually they are cooler, but not always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Help me Obi-Wan-not-sampled, you're our only hope Other then getting an actual pressure reading, I think with today's technology, They can see where the s/w is located by satellite and water vapor imagery easily enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Box playing the data-sparse-Pacific card heavily: As the parent system was still over the Pacific at the time of initial conditions...insufficient confidence to move to categorical probability of precipitation. Instead we have held at high-end likely...68 to 74 percent. The parent system moves ashore this morning...and so one would expect confidence to increase during the day. ... This analysis is of course based on the 00z models...and as noted earlier this could change as the parent system moves into the North American weather balloon domain. A headline may eventually be needed when forecast confidence increases. How can they not feel confident in categorical POPs? I can understand p-type uncertainties, but I would be pretty confident that you could go 100% POPs as something will fall from the sky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Help me Obi-Wan-not-sampled, you're our only hope That card is way overplayed IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 That stupid data sparse argument is maddening and assinine. i wish they would stop that crap..It's a cop out for them not having to commit to a forecast. That's exactly why they do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 Makes the OP run a little more suspect,We will see how today's runs go, I think we still see some ticks along the way and in a positive direction heh, how much more positive can it get for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 How can they not feel confident in categorical POPs? I can understand p-type uncertainties, but I would be pretty confident that you could go 100% POPs as something will fall from the sky. Yeah, If your tossing out probs and are not real confident then they should go with a lower number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 There is some truth to it because nothin beats good hard data, but that has been way overplayed recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 heh, how much more positive can it get for you? lol, Keeping H85 to my SE.......... , That run we were playing with fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack66 Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 This is the snowfall forecast from the 0z ecmwf run this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 lol, Keeping H85 to my SE.......... , That run we were playing with fire That was an over-amped run... but honestly at this point, I'd say ride the Euro until proven otherwise. Its been pretty rock steady and the others seem to be coming somewhere in the vicinity of its solution its had for several runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 How exciting it would be to be majority rain after freezing our balls off for weeks and getting no happy ending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 That was an over-amped run... but honestly at this point, I'd say ride the Euro until proven otherwise. Its been pretty rock steady and the others seem to be coming somewhere in the vicinity of its solution its had for several runs. Euro is always my model of choice, Even when it had a few hiccups this winter, I did not even totally write off its solutions then because of its record Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.