Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

March 2-4 Snowstorm Potential Part 3


Sickman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 629
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Does anyone know why it takes upton so long to admit they were wrong again? 3 storms in a row now huge bust for no reason less than 24 hours out! They still have 2-4" for northern areas?! Just admit you are wrong tell the public the truth! I hate the lowering totals slowly ideas! Our job is to get the forecast right and inform the public what is going to happen! Not try to change our initial forecast as little as possible..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And its because social media started hyping 6-18" of snow 3 days ago. They'll never learn

Nothing wrong with all of us including the NWS looking at models three days ago and thinking we might get more snow. The problem I think is that the NWS is too slow to lower totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z RAP shows the precip getting into CNJ by around 6pm...very sharp cutoff for the metro area with flurries...and then more of a light but does look to be steady light light snow Monday AM with second batch on future RAP radar

 

Yes. HRRR and Hi-Res Nam is on board with this as well. Interestingly the situation has flipped. Yesterday around this time we were expecting a bigger hit from wave 1 and a whiff for wave 2, whereas now it appears the models are showing the opposite: a graze from wave 1 and a small hit from wave 2. This would also corroborate the currently poor radar representation in our area...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And its because social media started hyping 6-18" of snow 3 days ago. They'll never learn

 

Agree! They are there own worse enemy! Going to unnecessarily give the nws a black-eye after a relative strong season….MT holly has been spot on all year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said a few days ago, it does not make me comfortable being in the jackpot zone for a storm like this 3-4 days out. It is bound to trend north or south. However, look at it this way : if social media only called for 3-6 inches and it showed a possible 10-15" there'd be so many complaints for so many reasons such as New York schools staying open due to the conservative forecast, people being unaware, etc

Sent from my iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said a few days ago, it does not make me comfortable being in the jackpot zone for a storm like this 3-4 days out. It is bound to trend north or south

Sent from my iPhone

Normally I disagree with this, but in this case there was some merit to that. There was no way the models were going to show the same solution for 4 days straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I disagree with this, but in this case there was some merit to that. There was no way the models were going to show the same solution for 4 days straight.

Your post quoting Craig Allen on the vendor thread is what I was trying to say there. But of course he said it all so much better. Weathermen have it tough. Unless the forecast is nearly nearly prefer, forecast will be bashed for being either too conservative or overdone

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your post quoting Craig Allen on the vendor thread is what I was trying to say there. But of course he said it all so much better. Weathermen have it tough. Unless the forecast is nearly nearly prefer, forecast will be bashed for being either too conservative or overdone

Sent from my iPhone

The public is somewhat to blame because they don't read and most can't understand when a map is posted its what a particular model is showing not a forecast but they run with it. It seems like the various facebook weather sites don't seem to mind or clarify though except for DT and then he just starts calling people morons and idiots lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plfdwxdude.....that is true. In general, when the public sees a map from any "weather source", they take it as something that could be very close to the outcome. If someone sees 10 to 20 inches.....most people would think "wow we could get almost 2 feet of snow!" And not think....most places will get 10", and people would definitely not think "well that is just an interpretation of a model's snow output that shows around 8-12" but snow ratios are great". The reality of it is that we could get 5" or even 2" from that forecast, especially if it is made days in advance. I think it is safe to say that the weather models and technology used today simply cannot accurately predict the weather or amount of snow or even rain that will fall over a specific area (even within 100-200 miles of that area) past 2 days

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At a party and only had a few minutes to skim the thread - looks ugly - but then why is Upton not lowering snowfalls by a lot more if it's that dry?  They still have 2-4" for NYC/NENJ, which implies Mt. Holly will likely still have at least 2-4", if not 3-6" for Central Jersey.  Can't believe they would just "hold on" to try to save face - they must be seeing something, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At a party and only had a few minutes to skim the thread - looks ugly - but then why is Upton not lowering snowfalls by a lot more if it's that dry?  They still have 2-4" for NYC/NENJ, which implies Mt. Holly will likely still have at least 2-4", if not 3-6" for Central Jersey.  Can't believe they would just "hold on" to try to save face - they must be seeing something, no?

I don't know what to think at this point. I dont think they can just drop all snowfall totals completely, we also still have a few models with .25" south of 78 which could support the 2 to 4" (forgetting the look of radar)

 

updated forecast for Middlesex....seems high even 4" for the northern parts and 6 south

MIDDLESEX-INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...NEW BRUNSWICK330 PM EST SUN MAR 2 2014...WINTER WEATHER ADVISORY IN EFFECT UNTIL 10 AM EST MONDAY....TONIGHT...SNOW. RAIN THIS EVENING. SNOW ACCUMULATION OF 2 TO4 INCHES. LOWS AROUND 19. NORTH WINDS 10 TO 15 MPH. CHANCE OFPRECIPITATION NEAR 100 PERCENT. .MONDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. SNOW...MAINLY IN THE MORNING. TOTAL SNOWACCUMULATION OF 4 TO 6 INCHES. HIGHS IN THE MID 20S. NORTH WINDS10 TO 15 MPH. CHANCE OF SNOW 90 PERCENT. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it still looks like a 1-3" snowfall is possible. Snow will be coming in while it's dark, it'll be cold, and there might be JUST enough moisture to squeeze out a couple inches....probably not 2-4", but technically, the 2" could verify

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advisories dropped for northern zones

 

WESTERN PASSAIC-EASTERN PASSAIC-WESTERN BERGEN-EASTERN BERGEN-
314 PM EST SUN MAR 2 2014

...WINTER WEATHER ADVISORY IS CANCELLED...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN NEW YORK HAS CANCELLED THE WINTER
WEATHER ADVISORY.

1 TO 3 INCHES OF SNOWFALL IS EXPECTED ACROSS THE AREA TONIGHT INTO
EARLY MONDAY MORNING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even now they r playing the down stepping game. Call it what it likely is : a trace to 2 ianches and be done with it but dont wait till the 10p package to do that because many are asleep by then bec of work in am!!

Exactly my point! I've been saying this all week and especially since they put out their first forecast Friday of 8-10" when most of us knew that it was trending south. Then this morning when it was game over they put out a briefing for locally heavy snow 1/4 mile visibility tomorrow am and 6" of snow for NYC and Long Island?! I don't get it it's unacceptable , if all of us pretty much knew it was going to miss, why can't the weather service get it right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...