Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

March 2-4 Snowstorm Potential Part 2


REDMK6GLI

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yes it is the NAM, but no doubts about it....it looks terrible

Sent from my iPhone

How does this look terrible for a 66 hr depiction?

f66.gif

 

please log off the computer and go have a few drinks to tone down your psychosis 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again Mixed Signals on here one post says Squashed and South than I'm reading Mod Snow by Hr 66..

 

Where are you seeing mixed signals? Compared to 18 this is more squashed and south. But yes as Allsnow said it does still snow SOME. Just because its south doesn't mean its not going to snow at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

every solution in the last 12 hours has given this subforum nothing particularly interesting, surprised that there's still so much discussion of the vagaries of a ho hum early March overrunning situation, seriously we're not looking at a '93 miller a or anything vaguely like the overrunning of the PD storms, so silly, just don't commit suicide, there will be more winters for at least 3-4 billion years on this planet (barring any catastrophic comet impacts here or on our moon)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you seeing mixed signals? Compared to 18 this is more squashed and south. But yes as Allsnow said it does still snow SOME. Just because its south doesn't mean its not going to snow at all.

 

 

IF it is still a 6 inch storm than it has my attention I am still hoping it can become the 12+ it looked like yesterday. My point is by reading some of the posts it sounded like barely any appreciable moisture would make it past Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF it is still a 6 inch storm than it has my attention I am still hoping it can become the 12+ it looked like yesterday. My point is by reading some of the posts it sounded like barely any appreciable moisture would make it past Philly.

 

Oh okay I gotcha. It's definitely less than 18z but still not terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea when I said rain I was speaking to the first part. Was wondering if Allsnow was including that first wave in the qpf or not.

Def south of 18z. At 18z I counted .95 in Monmouth county as frozen. 0z is closer to .70 now.

NYC looks closer to .4 to .5 frozen. At 0z

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Def south of 18z. At 18z I counted .95 in Monmouth county as frozen. 0z is closer to .70 now.

NYC looks closer to .4 to .5 frozen. At 0z

That's my point, this is trending slighty worse with each run....by tommorrow, it might really look bad barring a dramatic change of events

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This run looks ridiculous, toss it out I do not see that much support for the first wave. Where is the vort max, to me the second wave looks stronger, I will wait for the other models then decide.

agree 100% - the 0Z NAM is putting too much emphasis on the lead wave Sunday thus robbing the second wave of energy and precip coverage - you can tell by the lack of precip coverage - alot of warm air is going to be overrunning and precip is way underdone on that model

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...