Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

March Madness 03/03/2014 -------> The EURO abides


winterymix

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 996
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Dca is .70. I'd say 2-3 inches of snow

 

that seems about right...maybe a little higher...the profiles are so tight, this won't be an easy one in terms of dissecting precip type...

 

but the euro evolution is simple....one consolidated thump after a light rain/zr start....how the thump falls is TBD....but I imagine you would flip by 4-5am....and probably get 6-8"...based on this particular run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The storm is faster this run. Only 18 hour event compared to 24 plus at 12z. Not sure if the placement of the low has anything to do with it.

 

For those interested the zero line crosses BWI at 12z Mon. Looks like .43 falls between then and 18z. Surface temps in upper 20's at 12z crashing to low 20's by 18z. Total qpf. for event is .83

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not quite sure what is up with the GFS. It's tracking the storm north of the ECMWF and the NAM (yeah, yeah, too long range for the NAM to be reliable yet...but I like the NAM track - major snow for us!). GEFS spaghetti models from NCEP look like the bulk of the ensemble runs are south of the GFS, with only a couple outliers that pull the mean north.

 

Thinking the 0z ECMWF is probably a good system track based on all this, but maybe a little dry (it's been a bit dry the last several big storms we've had this winter, so I'm just assuming a continuation of that trend).

 

Right now I am just ignoring the GGEM. It looks like it really doesn't know what to do with this storm :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sleet is a colder sounding and you're almost always closer to snow, so I'll take sleet over zr

Yeah I dont get why anyone would rather have zr than sleet. I guess to some, bent over and broken trees and no power is appealing, but probably only to those that work with chainsaws and for electric companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is going to be a tough storm for the forum - reactions are going to vary widely based on expectations. Perhaps people should baseline what they are hoping for.

 

I am hoping for a majority or all frozen event - type of frozen doesn't concern me. Given the time of year, an interesting, almost all frozen long duration high impact event of some type is what I am hoping for. 

 

ETA: I am also going to mostly miss whatever we get. This is the stretch I am doing a long weekend in Burlington, VT with my better half.  We are taking the train up and back. Will be trying to train back on Monday with the train due back in Balt around 9:00 pm. Not sure how that is going to go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I dont get why anyone would rather have zr than sleet. I guess to some, bent over and broken trees and no power is appealing, but probably only to those that work with chainsaws and for electric companies.

 

Maybe he is thinking a light ZR coating (1/8" or less) which makes for beautiful trees. But that's not this storm. Way too much QPF for that.

 

Sleet is much more likely than ZR with this system, and latest models have me leaning toward snow over sleet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not quite sure what is up with the GFS. It's tracking the storm north of the ECMWF and the NAM (yeah, yeah, too long range for the NAM to be reliable yet...but I like the NAM track - major snow for us!). GEFS spaghetti models from NCEP look like the bulk of the ensemble runs are south of the GFS, with only a couple outliers that pull the mean north.

 

Thinking the 0z ECMWF is probably a good system track based on all this, but maybe a little dry (it's been a bit dry the last several big storms we've had this winter, so I'm just assuming a continuation of that trend).

 

Right now I am just ignoring the GGEM. It looks like it really doesn't know what to do with this storm :)

The NAM track would be ideal, but odds of it occurring are probably fairly low. One thing to remember, the NAO is positive so that supports the idea of a more northward track, plus seasonal trend. Need the PV to do its work and overwhelm the low and mid levels with cold, which per most guidance will occur eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just going to skip ahead from the Monday storm for a few minutes. Has anyone looked at the temperatures Wednesday morning? Near zero or sub-zero F temperatures across most of our region!

 

wunderground's wundermap models really show it well for ECMWF and GFS at around 12z on Wednesday.

 

Brrr. This is March, not mid-January!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't the NAM one of the last "warm" holdouts? Fact it has switched to a cold solution is encouraging.... even if it is the NAM and beyond 48 hours. GFS and EURO seem to have the same general idea with a few differences ... now it is just figuring out temps and what type of frozen precipitation we get. Still time for models to throw wrenches into all of this as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...