Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

March 2- 4 Snowstorm Potential


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

It amazes me that people like you are treating this as if it were April already. The antecedent air mass is more typical of January and the sun angle will have little to no effect. Maybe in Manhatten proper which always has sticking issues. UHI factor.

guess as soon as march 1st hits the sun wakes up.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It amazes me that people like you are treating this as if it were April already. The antecedent air mass is more typical of January and the sun angle will have little to no effect. Maybe in Manhatten proper which always has sticking issues. UHI factor.

 

Exactly, It's early March, not April. We won't have impressive ratios to work with, but we can still get a significant snowstorm if the GFS/EURO (850T/precip rates) are somewhat close to verifying. 

 

Things look very decent as of now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the euro shows temps falling into the teens as the storm progresses

Yea I posted that last night. Starts out at 40 and light rain and drops quickly into and through the 20s and it stops snowing when we are in the teens. The Euro also shuts off the precip a good 24+ hours before the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday, I had to sift through 2 pages of talk about the sun angle.  Look at history and look outside right now (sticking to everything!).  This air mass is remarkably anomolous and cold and it's March 2 --- which is really February if we're splitting hairs. 

Talking about the sun angle on March 2nd with an event modeled for 1.5" QPF and -10C 850s is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday, I had to sift through 2 pages of talk about the sun angle. Look at history and look outside right now (sticking to everything!). This air mass is remarkably anomolous and cold and it's March 2 --- which is really February if we're splitting hairs.

The only time Sun angle really comes into play is during the middle of the day if it's snowing lightly and temps are around freezing or above..and that can mean anytime of the year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its possible that if the northern ULL becomes more of a player we will see the overrunning squashed and this ends being a coastal storm that redevelops on a stalled front. 

 

So far the Euro doesn't drop the PV into the Lakes and it's more progressive than GFS . But we'll see if it starts

moving in a more amplified direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only is it not April but it's the very, very beginning of March. Might as well call it the tail end of February which it would be if February had a least 30 days like every other month. The storm will begin less than two weeks after President's Day, one of our most historically snowiest days, that should tell you something. Early March can deliver and has done so in the past. Another two to three weeks from now it would be a bit of a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time Sun angle really comes into play is during the middle of the day if it's snowing lightly and temps are around freezing or above..and that can mean anytime of the year

Exactly.  It's frustrating!  You get 30 hours of mod snow, it's going to pile up with this airmass and this time of year...  Simple. 

 

Now on to the next models!  So far, the first just knocked it out of the park (of course if you want a snowy event...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only is it not April but it's the very, very beginning of March. Might as well call it the tail end of February which it would be if February had a least 30 days like every other month. The storm will begin less than two weeks after President's Day, one of our most historically snowiest days, that should tell you something. Early March can deliver and has done so in the past. Another two to three weeks from now it would be a bit of a different story.

Actually it wouldn't. In 03 we had snow accumulate mid day in april.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some individuals tried to use the 'sun-angle argument' during the October 2011 noreaster and we had 1 to 2 ft across  much of interior.

Oh that one.  Wow.  That would have been a problem but the snow was SOOOO heavy, the sun could do nothing!  Much like April '82. 

 

Bottom line - if it snows hard enough, it will accummulate any time of year.

 

Just like hail in the summer time!  (conceptually different, but you get it....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it wouldn't. In 03 we had snow accumulate mid day in april.

That's a rare occurrence, and as you get closer to April sun angle does begin to play a role. The beginning of April sun angle is equivalent to the end of August. Not saying it can't happen, because it obviously has and will again, if you can get heavy enough rates and a cold enough air mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a rare occurrence, and as you get closer to April sun angle does begin to play a role. The beginning of April sun angle is equivalent to the end of August. Not saying it can't happen, because it obviously has and will again, if you can get heavy enough rates and a cold enough air mass.

May 1977 I believe in New England proves that snow can accumulate despite sun angle. Cold and rates play more of a role obviously than late December, but it's difficult getting much accumulation if temps are borderline and the snow is light during January. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...