Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 25th-26th snow threat disco and obs


attml

Recommended Posts

It wouldn't surprise me to kinda suck with this one. We seem to have a knack for doing ok with sneaky events but then weaking out with the more advertised events. We might have used up our lucky chips today. Or atmospheric memory and a winning season prevails. My bar Is another clean inch.

Despite the lack of scientific prevalence in that theory, its one I share with you. It just always seems that way. One would think this could deliver 2-4" in spots, but I'm with you, 1"+ makes me happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 769
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Radar trends indicate a band might set up right across Richmond. However much of the state will get hit tonight and tomorrow morning. You can bet I will be GLUED to that radarscope all night long. Radar trends indicate snow coverage is increasing with time.

 

Northern Virginia and DC are right on track for 1-2 inches of snow. No need to update headlines at this time

 

Another plus is that the dewpoints are fairly close to the ambient dry bulb temps. We wont waste much snow on moistening up this column

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, weather question. What are the physical processes that cause a precip forecast like the NAM I saw earlier. Why does the precip seem to skip the 81 corridor and develop east? Just curious as it seems to happen a couple times each winter.

BTW congrats on the snow today. It didn't do much out here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, weather question. What are the physical processes that cause a precip forecast like the NAM I saw earlier. Why does the precip seem to skip the 81 corridor and develop east? Just curious as it seems to happen a couple times each winter.

BTW congrats on the snow today. It didn't do much out here

 

downsloping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    The NCEP 1.33 km NAM fire weather nest tonight was run over the DC area.

 

        http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/

 

   The 1 km reflectivity loop is kinda interesting.    It starts as a swath of light precip that overspreads the entire area and then breaks into some WNW-ESE oriented heavier bands with gaps of lighter precip in between.  Each of the bands generates over 0.1" of liquid;  in areas that don't get under one of the bands it's generally just under 0.1".

 

   The HRRR runs this evening also suggest a banded structure, although the RAP/HRRR are little later with the timing of the heavier bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    The NCEP 1.33 km NAM fire weather nest tonight was run over the DC area.

 

        http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/

 

   The 1 km reflectivity loop is kinda interesting.    It starts as a swath of light precip that overspreads the entire area and then breaks into some WNW-ESE oriented heavier bands with gaps of lighter precip in between.  Each of the bands generates over 0.1" of liquid;  in areas that don't get under one of the bands it's generally just under 0.1".

 

   The HRRR runs this evening also suggest a banded structure, although the RAP/HRRR are little later with the timing of the heavier bands.

 

 

Cool model-- any comparison to other Hi res for viability? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool model-- any comparison to other Hi res for viability? 

 

    The fire wx nest is very viable if you believe that the parent NAM has a handle on the current synoptics.    It's a one-way nest, meaning that the parent model synoptics are feeding into the nest (but the 1.33 km details are not feeding back to the parent).   It's basically the same model as the parent but with explicit convection.   The evolution of precip can vary significantly from the parent in a convective environment, but it often follows the parent in non-convective events like this;  it just resolves the structure within the precip shield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    The fire wx nest is very viable if you believe that the parent NAM has a handle on the current synoptics.    It's a one-way nest, meaning that the parent model synoptics are feeding into the nest (but the 1.33 km details are not feeding back to the parent).   It's basically the same model as the parent but with explicit convection.   The evolution of precip can vary significantly from the parent in a convective environment, but it often follows the parent in non-convective events like this;  it just resolves the structure within the precip shield.

 

Thanks for the explanation :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...