Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chargers10
    Newest Member
    Chargers10
    Joined

Pattern reload cold and snow discussion last week of February


Ginx snewx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 825
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, relative to normal, per given latitudinal distinction (if you will... call them, MA/SNE/NNE) this does appear to be an SNE winter. That March/April thing you mention, obviously we don't have upslope and other mountain effects to contend with, but we will have the proverbial "bowling season" yet to possibly really make things special.

Those can really save a season, and even you guys up there can cash in on bigger balls. haha. Seriously, we could be 175% of normal down here on March 15, then get an equinox cut-off bomb and really put the screws to the record books. Or, obviously you could struggling to get to seasonal quotas when boom, saved by the bell.

I hate April -- I've gone on record in my opining diatribes... But I would never discount the possibility of an interesting encore

Yeah the end of the season really is the wild card...sort of where does it all finally fit in the historical record. All it would take is a couple big ones and all looks good in the raw snowfall totals up here. Like you said for you guys, a couple big ones and this winter is truly historic.

The upslope up here has really been whats handicapped us as it's been missing due to a missing cyclonic flow to our NE. The flow aloft has been really westerly or SWly, and we haven't had storms slow down and spin up to the north/east. It's an interesting phenomenon to think about how a mesoscale feature like that just can never develop due to the background synoptic pattern. Season isn't over, but we usually have a couple big upslope events of 1-3 feet per winter, amid a lot of 3-6 inchers. Without those, it's hard for the mountains to achieve normal snowfall...it's like taking lake effect snow from the Great Lakes region (which some winters just don't produce a lot of Lake Effect for whatever reason, while other winters can bury), and their chances for average snowfall drop off a cliff. Not that 99% of this board cares, and in fact is probably glad to not have upslope every other day posts from me, haha. 2011-2012 really seemed to breed animosity towards upslope when everyone else suffered in snowfall that winter but we piled it up at times, including a 36" in 36 hour event in February 2012. But then we get pay back like this year with little to none.

I'm hopeful we can end up near average at least, but the flavor of this winter is known so I'm fine with it....I mean there will be winters (maybe sooner rather than later) when maybe we are the southern end of the good snows, and it's atrocious down south. Or a winter where every storm seems to be a deep interior snow bomb and the frustrations aren't W/NW New England but eastern sections.

It comes and goes from winter to winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a little concerned that basically no other piece of guidance is showing a euro type solution for Wednesday. We aren't really in lala land anymore, and it does look like the euro cut back slightly from the 00z run. Hopefully that's not the start of a trend, but I'm not really feeling all that great about this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Wed is not going to be a miss or just for the coast. The pattern as it has all winter argues for an in closer solution. We saw thus same thing happen in Dec an Jan with storms

 

I hate to say it but I actually agree with this. A few GEFS members also have some fun solutions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mountains up here are running some decent negative departures in snowfall...the valleys are pretty close to normal though. It's more stark though when I'm say in the upper 70s for snow right now (not a far pace from normal which is 125" for the season), with March and April left. However the Boston suburbs are at about the same values which has to be like 200% of normal to date. So we have not been privy to the same note-worthy snows as further south...and overall it'll be a forgettable winter most likely (as most average or a tick below average winters are).

At the end of January though, the mountains up here were below normal by values that are similar to most SNE annual snowfalls. We'd have to have a big March and April for the mountains to have a shot at normal (say 140" in two months, not unheard of but takes a pattern we haven't seen yet this year).

What comes around goes around, each winter has it's flavor and different areas remember different winters in the lore of "good winters."

 

I guess in my first year here I was hoping it would be one of the "good ones", and it just didn't really work out, but it's still better than a sub 40 season (like 2011-2012). February was good, until this most recent rainer. As for the mountains you are right, there have been no big upslope events. That is certainly a major missing element. My current guess is that we come in slightly below normal at BTV on snowfall at the close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Wed is not going to be a miss or just for the coast. The pattern as it has all winter argues for an in closer solution. We saw thus same thing happen in Dec an Jan with storms

 

Who said a miss or just for the coast? I'm saying what it shows now and given the pattern..I don't think it has much room to come west..it actually went SE of 00z. If you have a GFS/Euro compromise..it isn't much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said a miss or just for the coast? I'm saying what it shows now and given the pattern..I don't think it has much room to come west..it actually went SE of 00z. If you have a GFS/Euro compromise..it isn't much.

I agree with you here. As much as I would love this to work out, the euro deff ticked SE, which is concerning given where all other guidance currently stands. As you said, something even in the middle is still pretty meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you here. As much as I would love this to work out, the euro deff ticked SE, which is concerning given where all other guidance currently stands. As you said, something even in the middle is still pretty meh.

 

It could still come NW...I'm  not saying it won't.....and I want it to...but it only has so much room I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could still come NW...I'm not saying it won't.....and I want it to...but it only has so much room I think.

Yeah, we've seen this winter that a good majority have come nw in the end, but I don't necessarily think anyone should be banking on that, or assuming it's likely even.

We will see what happens, but even if it does come nw, this type of storm will favor southeast areas regardless, that's just how it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we've seen this winter that a good majority have come nw in the end, but I don't necessarily think anyone should be banking on that, or assuming it's likely even.

We will see what happens, but even if it does come nw, this type of storm will favor southeast areas regardless, that's just how it is

 

I don't disagree it will come NW, I just wish Kevin would look at a model instead of blindly commenting on what a pattern may or may not do. Hopefully 00z runs are bullish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to incite resentment ... but seriously, are you folks running negative snow anomalies on the season -- or what are your averages, curiously.

Often times we find that winter seems to favor bands (relative to their local norms) in latitude from year to year. This can be MA/SNE/NNE for example, and looking back at the past 5 years, it seems each has had their share.

Running at normal at BTV (57" to date) and below in the elevations (not sure of those exact departures). After this week BTV will likely be below again. We were as much as a foot below normal in January.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MEX MOS seems really warm for the end of the week. I guess getting skewed by climo but I have a hard time buying 13/31 and 12/32 for BDL on Thursday/Friday with 850s near/below -20C. 

 

I was just saying how this will be a "MOS For the Loss" airmass and more of a 2m temp type deal. IOW 2m temps are probably going to be closer to correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In any case, look at the huge arctic high building south. Thicknesses should be ignored especially the further south one goes because it becomes more of a shallow arctic airmass at that point. You can see this on the 2m temp departures vs 850 and even 500mb height departures. Those temp departures are not what you would expect if one just looks at the height anomalies at 500mb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...