Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Tuesday over running event


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

About 99% of the posts I make to this board are ignored...while "OMG will they close the schools???" get 37 replies on average...so I assume no one's looking that closely anyhow.

Nah ur stuff is never ignored. Ur great my man. Just was trying to sift through model stuff.

I like upton s 2 to 4. Will add to the totals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 634
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nah ur stuff is never ignored. Ur great my man. Just was trying to sift through model stuff.

I like upton s 2 to 4. Will add to the totals

 

It was nothing personal pal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don that's weird...the weatherbell snow maps from that same run give NW areas 2-4 and a small area in NE NJ 4-6....and NYC 2-3 or so. I wonder why the discrepancy

Sent from my iPhone

Don's map is not snow accumulation.

It's the amount of total precip that has fallen as snow. Not how much has accumulated.

How much of it would stick, depends on temps.

That's why I think meteocentre's maps are the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don's map is not snow accumulation.

It's the amount of total precip that has fallen as snow. Not how much has accumulated.

How much of it would stick, depends on temps.

That's why I think meteocentre's maps are the best.

Yeah, but I find it weird then....NW areas get more precip as snow, yet less accumulation. SE areas get less precip as snow and more accumulation? If anything, it'd usually be opposite, except if the model is picking up on some kind of banding with dynamic cooling...I doubt it

Update : it makes sense. I didn't realize that NENJ is the jackpot on this map. It does go along with weatherbell's map. There's just such a sharp cutoff that I missed it

Sent from my iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don's map is not snow accumulation.

It's the amount of total precip that has fallen as snow. Not how much has accumulated.

How much of it would stick, depends on temps.

That's why I think meteocentre's maps are the best.

 

Are you positive on that? I find it odd that a precip map would cut totals right on the I-95 line, that seems something a snow map would do...

 

EDIT: I misread you, it makes sense that snow could fall and not accumulate, woops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...