Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Tuesday over running event


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

I don't see that as a problem at all.  Upto 156 dm thickness for that layer is usually fine for snow in our region.  The devil is usually in the details at specific levels, but other things being equal, averaged across the 700-850 layer that partial thickness is usually snow in our area and not even close to borderline.  I've never understood the color coding for that partial thickness as it is very misleading.

 

To Illustrate this, compare the 850-700 thickness from today's 12z NAM at 15z tomorrow to the NAM forecast soundings for KNYC at that same hour.  Well below OC throughout that layer:

 

post-290-0-05935200-1392656243_thumb.jpg

 

post-290-0-33071400-1392656717_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 634
  • Created
  • Last Reply

When aren't the nmm & arw really wet? Cut them in Half and it's somewhat realistic

Don't be so sure.. GGEM in my opinion has been the most underrated medium/shortrange model of the year.. Did near perfect with the big storm last Thursday as well as this Saturdays storm and is showing between .50 and .75 area wide. However only north and west burbs stay all snow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs text output is good critical thickness wise for Long Island, but the 925-1000 hpa layer is warm (hr.27-hr 30) leading to an eventual mix.

 

kfrg:(Nassau)

 

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kfrg.txt

 

kisp:(Suffolk- central)

 

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kisp.txt

 

kmtp:(Suffolk- east end)

 

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kmtp.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs text output is good critical thickness wise for Long Island, but the 925-1000 hpa layer is warm (hr.27-hr 30) leading to an eventual mix.

kfrg:(Nassau)

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kfrg.txt

kisp:(Suffolk- central)

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kisp.txt

kmtp:(Suffolk- east end)

http://68.226.77.253/text/GFS/GFS_kmtp.txt

Yea boundary layer issues look inevitable there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say lock it. 6-9" Just NW of NYC from NE NJ on NW including the rest of Northern NJ and LHV

I still think this is going to be nowcasting event regarding totals in any specific area of the metro since this is such a fragile dynamic setup - amount of precip and temp profiles etc etc which are very tricky in these situations - will definetly be a few surprises along the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...