Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Tuesday over running event


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 634
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

The trend this morning has been Wetter and colder. And I assume WSW with 6 plus go up from mercer all the way up in the LHV for everyone west of 95 and 2 to 4 for most others with the exception of Ocean Counties the 12z suite has bought the deeper slp and evaporative cooling

 

Given we still don't have model consensus on 6" or more for Mercer to Lehigh Valley and for interior north/central NJ, I'd be surprised if the NWS went to more than advisories (except maybe Poconos/Sussex/Orange/Putnam). I think they'll be confident in 3" amounts verifying, but not 6" amounts, plus they don't tend to jump on model trends, but rather adjust, so I'd predict advisories go up soon, which can always be upgraded to warnings tonight if the cold/snowy trend continues with the 0Z models. Next question, as usual, is how far to the S/E do the advisories go, i.e, just to I-95 and points N/W of there or will they include Monmouth, NW Burlington, Ocean, etc. Just my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Given we still don't have model consensus on 6" or more for Mercer to Lehigh Valley and for interior north/central NJ, I'd be surprised if the NWS went to more than advisories (except maybe Poconos/Sussex/Orange/Putnam). I think they'll be confident in 3" amounts verifying, but not 6" amounts, plus they don't tend to jump on model trends, but rather adjust, so I'd predict advisories go up soon, which can always be upgraded to warnings tonight if the cold/snowy trend continues with the 0Z models. Next question, as usual, is how far to the S/E do the advisories go, i.e, just to I-95 and points N/W of there or will they include Monmouth, NW Burlington, Ocean, etc. Just my two cents.

Looks like high end advisory for most areas, except for the coastal sections of counties like Monmouth/Ocean. Same further north, Upton will likely issue advisories for all except southern Queens, Nassau, and eastern Suffolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like high end advisory for most areas, except for the coastal sections of counties like Monmouth/Ocean. Same further north, Upton will likely issue advisories for all except southern Queens, Nassau, and eastern Suffolk.

 

I don't think northern Nassau will be left out of the advisory if and when they issue one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trend this morning has been Wetter and colder. And I assume WSW with 6 plus go up from mercer all the way up in the LHV for everyone west of 95 and 2 to 4 for most others with the exception of Ocean Counties the 12z suite has bought the deeper slp and evaporative cooling

WSW I assume means going straight to winter storm warnings and skipping the watch - whens the last time that happened ? I wouldn't believe it was even possible except in this particular winter - if NYC somehow manages to get to 60 inches seasonal after this storm the record 95 - 96 of 75.6 inches is on the radar screen and possible IMO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I meant northern Nassau and NW Suffolk also. The dividing line might be the Southern State Parkway, maybe even Sunrise Highway. That's where it essentially was last storm and could be this time.

I'm literally a few hundred yards off the Southern State, and maybe 1.6 miles away from Sunrise HGWY, Usually the LIE is the line of demarcation with South to North events over Long Island. However, we'll see. I might ride the storm out at my upstate house as there is a solid 30+ inch base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the 12z data (gfs/nam). I think it's safe to put Long Island in the 1-3 inch range with a change to a mix after 16z. 3 inches would be confined to areas on the north shore with the eastern end seeing less accumulations maybe an inch. I think the NAM is a little too amped, and cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

388

FXUS61 KPHI 171549

AFDPHI

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MOUNT HOLLY NJ

1049 AM EST MON FEB 17 2014

SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH 6 AM TUESDAY/

1048 AM NOTE: WE ARE AWARE OF THE ROBUST 12Z/17 NAM AND RGEM

MODELS AND THE LESSER BUT STILL MORE ROBUST 12Z GFS WHEN COMPARED

TO THE 06Z VSN...ALL THIS FOR THE NJT AND I95 REGION TUESDAY

MORNING AND EVALUATING TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBORING OFFICES AND

THE NCEP. NO CHANGES IN THE FCST AT THIS TIME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the 12z data (gfs/nam). I think it's safe to put Long Island in the 1-3 inch range with a change to a mix after 16z. 3 inches would be confined to areas on the north shore with the eastern end seeing less accumulations maybe an inch.

At this pont, any ideas what it looks like for NE Sussex Co. In NJ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given we still don't have model consensus on 6" or more for Mercer to Lehigh Valley and for interior north/central NJ, I'd be surprised if the NWS went to more than advisories (except maybe Poconos/Sussex/Orange/Putnam). I think they'll be confident in 3" amounts verifying, but not 6" amounts, plus they don't tend to jump on model trends, but rather adjust, so I'd predict advisories go up soon, which can always be upgraded to warnings tonight if the cold/snowy trend continues with the 0Z models. Next question, as usual, is how far to the S/E do the advisories go, i.e, just to I-95 and points N/W of there or will they include Monmouth, NW Burlington, Ocean, etc. Just my two cents.

The way I see it is we have pretty good consensus of .5 plus. NAM GGEM JMA SREF RGEM for me the issue will resolving the mid levels east of I95

Would like to have the Euros physics here but its been weak all year out of the northern branch. I agree w NAO. We go right to a warning west of the tpke for nothing more than the rates out west are high and ths comes during the morning rush.

IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't see that as a problem at all.  Upto 156 dm thickness for that layer is usually fine for snow in our region.  The devil is usually in the details at specific levels, but other things being equal, averaged across the 700-850 layer that partial thickness is usually snow in our area and not even close to borderline.  I've never understood the color coding for that partial thickness as it is very misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...