JetsPens87 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Just not sure with minus 5 with .5 falling the BL doesn't cool. ( as long as the 925 sr ok) That was 850 to 700mb critical thicknesses. It's Showing an EWL somewhere in there most likely due to the strong flow into the significant mid level Ridge. However there also may be the potential there for some decent frontogenesis. Potential is certainly there for an elevated warm front as the incoming warmer air rides over the cold pool. This is reflected nicely on 700mb. I haven't looked at frontogenesis maps for the nam or 4k nam but suspect it would show this nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 GFS is up to an inch for the NYC area. Up to 2" far NW. Looks like most of the precip falls as rain Sent from my iPhone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsPens87 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I've always assumed the fetch of moist air coming in with a storm off the coast includes air originating hundreds of miles away, like off the Gulf Stream, which is much warmer than the mid-30s. Not sure what the aggregate air temp coming in via SE winds is, but I imagine it's warmer than just the air right off the coast. Your assumption is correct. All those mid 30 temps near the coast can't do much when the fetch stretches much further than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weathergun Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I've always assumed the fetch of moist air coming in with a storm off the coast includes air originating hundreds of miles away, like off the Gulf Stream, which is much warmer than the mid-30s. Not sure what the aggregate air temp coming in via SE winds is, but I imagine it's warmer than just the air right off the coast.[ SSTs in 40s about 25 to 50 miles offshore: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdp146 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 SSTs off the coast are in the lower to mid 30's, SE wind isnt going to hurt like in Dec I think it depends on where you are. If you are on the immediate coast by about 5-8 miles a low level SE wind at 15-30knts, even with 850s at -5, can still end as liquid at the surface. I am right near the coast and spiked to 42 degrees yesterday before the precip really picked up and winds came out of the NE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 -TILT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 SE winds are an absolute killer for anyone near the coast. A stronger solution may be great a little ways inland but near the coast it could be a quick burst of snow to a washout. 850s can show whatever it wants, but those surface winds are bad, for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Will probably ride the RGEM on Ptype again and as of now it's mostly snow for LGA and JFK goes over to PL or SNPL about 13z, everyone gets sine drizzle or light rain at the end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Your assumption is correct. All those mid 30 temps near the coast can't do much when the fetch stretches much further than that. Thanks for confirming... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 We had snow here a few weeks ago with strong SE winds and a surface temp of around 25. Deference then and now is we had a very cold antecedent air mass to our south. The air mass we have now is much warmer than that plus we have no real HP to north, only the existing one that moves into an unfavorable spot east of Newfoundland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitchel Volk Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 Not so straight forward, if the secondary develops a little faster then the se winds will be weaker and then shift quicker to a more easterly position then the BL holds off the warmer a little longer. Another important thing to watch is the trajectory of the wind at this point it is not very good. Another factor will there be a little cold air damming, if so then the snow would last longer. These are some of the issues to look at. It is not the easiest forecast to make. The exact time of the changer over can be from 12Zto 15Z for Central Park. Every minute will make a big difference of accumulations. Areas at the immediate coast the accumulations will be minimal . While HPN will see mainly snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherfreeeeak Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Anything on RGEM, GGEM, UKIE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Not so straight forward, if the secondary develops a little faster then the se winds will be weaker and then shift quicker to a more easterly position then the BL holds off the warmer a little longer. Another important thing to watch is the trajectory of the wind at this point it is not very good. Another factor will there be a little cold air damming, if so then the snow would last longer. These are some of the issues to look at. It is not the easiest forecast to make. The exact time of the changer over can be from 12Zto 15Z for Central Park. Every minute will make a big difference of accumulations. Areas at the immediate coast the accumulations will be minimal . While HPN will see mainly snow. True, Feb 22 2008 might be a decent analog here, although that had the secondary further south and dumped 4-8" area wide ending in drizzle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 True, Feb 22 2008 might be a decent analog here, although that had the secondary further south and dumped 4-8" area wide ending in drizzle. 3/9/82 is now the best analog appearing on CIPS...the setup is not as good as this one as the initial low went more inland and no coastal formed...but LGA did see snow for a few hours before the BL torched but as you can see in the obs even with a southerly of 15 knots it took hours to get substantial warmth and that was with very little snow falling, more sustained snow would likely have allowed temps to stay cooler. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NARR/1982/us0309.php http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KLGA/1982/3/9/DailyHistory.html?req_city=La+Guardia&req_state=NY&req_statename=New+York Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scooter13 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Nothing interesting on the ECMWF I'm guessing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 0z JMA is still going with .50+ for the NYC area http://grib2.com/jma/CONUS_JMA_1000-500_SLPTHKPRP_48HR.gif http://grib2.com/jma/CONUS_JMA_SFC_ACCUM-PRECIP_48HR.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Meh, I'm regardless expecting an inch or two here and within 15 miles or so of the coast despite any redevelopment. If it's really weak we see the inch or two and then precip ends as drizzle, if stronger the inch or two and then soaking rain. Of course inland has more riding on it. Best of luck Manhattan/Bronx on NW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Anything on RGEM, GGEM, UKIE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Looks like a general 1-3 inch storm for the area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 ARW NMM Both impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 ARW NMM Both impressive Very likely not for you and I unless winds can pivot away from SE. Unless that happens we have a very low ceiling for how much snow we can get before rain. Maybe very heavy rates can hold that off, but SE winds are very dangerous to play around with any time of the year. It had hopefully be in the low-mid 20s at highest when the snow moves in to give some breathing room. The ocean is pretty cold as well but the SE fetch is pretty far and can still overwhelm with warm enough boundary layer air for near the shore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Very likely not for you and I unless winds can pivot away from SE. Unless that happens we have a very low ceiling for how much snow we can get before rain. Maybe very heavy rates can hold that off, but SE winds are very dangerous to play around with any time of the year. It had hopefully be in the low-mid 20s at highest when the snow moves in to give some breathing room. The ocean is pretty cold as well but the SE fetch is pretty far and can still overwhelm with warm enough boundary layer air for near the shore. If the SE winds are not strong, we will be fine. We also need good rates. I like the look of the mesoscale models ( NMM and ARW ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJWeather201 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Yummy, imagine a surprise attack such as the NMM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherfreeeeak Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 How have these performed this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
odwalla Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 This is morphing from an overrunning event into a combo that could include precipitation from a coastal. Both hi-res models are impressive and their solutions aren't terribly different from the NAM and EURO -- temp profiles on the ARW/NMM are favorable for the duration of the event, as well. It seems that they may be picking up on yet another last-minute trend. This is something to watch, and while 2-4" for the metro looks likely, a narrow swath of 6"+ totals is within the realm of possibilities; it would come in an extreme thump late Tuesday AM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
odwalla Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The 06z NAM is responding; at 24, more digging of the (stronger) shortwave, more ridging ahead, and a stronger presence on SIM radar by hr 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJWeather201 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The 06z NAM is responding; at 24, more digging of the (stronger) shortwave, more ridging ahead, and a stronger presence on SIM radar by hr 27. Me thinks we see a cave to higher QPF. Last minute trend here it looks like. .5" contour back to Eastern NJ and east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
odwalla Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Me thinks we see a cave to higher QPF. Last minute trend here it looks like. .5" contour back to Eastern NJ and east. Indeed. 06z NAM is 4-6" for NYC. Impressive increase in QPF. If the hi-res models are any indicator, we will see additional increases; could parts of the region see another event of 10"+? We shall see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WE GOT HIM Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 4k has .75+...I don't know how believable this event is yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.