Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 0z RGEM looks nothing like the 12z RGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juliancolton Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 My RGEM is out to 30. out to 44 here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM crushes CThttp://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 My RGEM is out to 30. It's the state of NJ further south as we approach 48 hours. It's not as wound up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I like the RGEM solution tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Roughly 990-992 vs 978 at 48 hours compared to the earlier run. Nice hit for Steve Will..and the same stripe Beast-SR. Definitely S&E of earlier RGEM runs though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 If indeed the RGEM were significantly less wound up, then that would be intriguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I like the RGEM solution tonight there's our toaster bath up here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 nam + rgem = not the team you want to play for (but at least we are fielding one). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I like the RGEM solution tonight 850 crashes south too, porno 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 man GFS is a crush job for the SE in terms of ICE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 At 48 hours around 990-92 mb a decent bit east of NJ. NH and Maine getting smoked with snow, it's warmed everywhere south of NH but there's not a ton of precip VS 976 parked off the Jersey coast on the 60hr GGEM panel. LOL. This is miserable for the pros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I like the RGEM solution tonight You think that little weenie appendage near rt 128 if cf attributed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I think the GFS may go SE at first glance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 gfs looks slower or further se Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS is ugly again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS is a mess again...pretty weak and not overly impressive on the front end. Prob advisory stuff or maybe low end warning for most of SNE. We'll see if it tries any type of stinger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 that is a weird look. looks se but warmer and theres a thin backlash snow down to SC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I think the GFS may go SE at first glance. Way SE, like OTS SE? Sorry that was a rhetorical question. LOL Showtime! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Ha! NAM gets warmer but still gives me 12" then 0.5 of rain then 3" on the backside. I'll take that! GFS gives me about 2" then 2"? RGEM is what about 10". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 LOL...GFS has a massive stinger. Maybe even a flash freeze type thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Rgem did somethin funky hr 36-39 big neg tilt early...love the weenie screw zone n of bos running west on rgem snowfall map..and know i dont buy it. Now for gfs to cook somethin up. Gfs is sort of the guy you dont want batting in a big position..late in a playoff game...chokes soo many times @36-48 hrs on "big ones" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Wow, then it goes apesh*t after hr 48 ad redevelops a massive CCB. It;s rather warm though, but very interesting. Edit...holy stinger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 that is a weird look. looks se but warmer and theres a thin backlash snow down to SC. Weird look (weak sauce) correlates to a warmer solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 978-977 @54 south of SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 It goes to town right over Mass before it moves into maine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 The H5 low was further SW so it was a bit slower and further S. The H5 s/w being further south was able to close off in time to keep the low further south and redevelop a CCB. This is what I alluded too. It then had a mega stinger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Ha! NAM gets warmer but still gives me 12" then 0.5 of rain then 3" on the backside. I'll take that! GFS gives me about 2" then 2"? RGEM is what about 10". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bboughton Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 So moral of the story is we still don't know much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.