N. OF PIKE Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Backlash dumping snows are as frequent as actual Bigfoot sightings...ultimate weenie fodder ...happens every well..ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 saw in the nyc forum that only half of the hunters data got put into the 0z nam but all of it should make it for the gfs That was a porno run, too bad it's just a movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 NAM has 1.85" total qpf for bedford.. about 1.6 as snow maybe.. only above freezing at 850-800 for about 6 hrs? sleet I assume? http://68.226.77.253/text/NAM80km/NAM_Kbed.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 ummmm...? where do i sign for that? NAM decided to down a few red bulls tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 If only the nam was reliable lol. Nice run for all. It refuses to waver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 When do the RGEM/GGEM and UK come out? Sleepy minds want to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 The mid/upper lows really start to go to town over SNE. Yeah it looks good, but nothing to do with sfc pressure or bombogenesis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leesun Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 huh, it's a function of bombogenisis, physically its correct now the NAM having it right is another thing. Many models have shown it in some form or another, looks like a secondary low at long range then in close it becomes part of the dynamic. Look up stinger jet on Google Yeah it's on the back side of the 700 mb closed low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Well it is the NAM, but also we are 6 hrs closer to the event with ROAB data. So, it means something anyways. The problem is that sometimes the "something" is worth little...lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 there's nothing bombing about this system on the NAM.check your facts, 1001-975 in 24 hrs equals 26 mb, bombogenisis is 24 mb in 24 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 If this all plays out correctly, this will be a KU. Just on the shear magnitude of population it will eventually effect. The ice down south etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Backlash dumping snows are as frequent as actual Bigfoot sightings...ultimate weenie fodder ...happens every well..yaI saw Bigfoot 12/09/05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 no doubt about that.. Nam gives 12+ for a ton of people If this all plays out correctly, this will be a KU. Just on the shear magnitude of population it will eventually effect. The ice down south etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Good H7 track for you. Yeah we'll see...I was sort of surprised how lacking the NAM was up here with the H7 low going over SNE. Typically that's a great climo track here with QPF being unloaded in the CCB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Englander Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Much better spot than North Attleboro, where I'm from. Ironically only ~10 miles or so NW. There were seemingly endless storms I remember in the 80's-90's where Franklin doubled the Attleboro's snowfall. Dec '92 classic example - 12" in Franklin, 6" in N. Attleboro. You'll do okay, not a perfect setup though. It is quite amazing with the difference in a relatively small area. It seems as if this is the edge of many setups where one stays frozen. Dec 92 was awesome. I did not realize Attleboro got 6 inches. Quite amazing. I was living in Ashland at the time and we ended up with 26 inches. One of the most classic examples of that occurrence. At my age, I remember the 80s quite well and there were cold and snowless winters but 86/87 and 87/88 were good ones in Ashland.... but I have to say that the Dec 1992 storm was one of my favorites of all time. We changed over exactly at 11pm that Friday night and it just came down like crazy. ORH was snow for most of that day if I recall correctly. But yes this setup is not prime for this area but not a rainstorm either. Nice to talk to someone who knows the area well. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I was going to say it but held off NAM kind of reminds me of that I saw Bigfoot 12/09/05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Yeah it looks good, but nothing to do with sfc pressure or bombogenesis. Well the sfc redevelops and deepens rapidly. Not sure if it's 24mb in 24hrs...didn't count it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 check your facts, 1001-975 in 24 hrs equals 26 mb, bombogenisis is 24 mb in 24 hrs The NAM has a 975mb low? Not doubting you but what I see doesn't show it, crude maps? nor does it show the deepening you are talking about. And yes it's the NAM so it's probably incorrect anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I saw Bigfoot 12/09/05Most of your cell phone pics have Bigfoot in them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 NAM is a huge omega bomb. 0.86" in 6hr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 NAM is a huge omega bomb. 0.86" in 6hr.Lots of Thundersnow if that were to verify Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 (24 millibars or more) in 24 hour period is referred to as bombogenesis, and is usually present during the formation of a nor'easter.[2] How is a 1009MB L off the Virginia coast then 24 hrs. later 981MB in the GOM not a bomb? Ah it's a bomb. Dynamic cooling oh pretty please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 and remember...he likes euro in big EC systems. interesting first call: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 When do the RGEM/GGEM and UK come out? Sleepy minds want to know. You should sleep well. Unless this gets shoved 100+ mi. E you (and hopefully me) are getting warning criteria snows and quite possibly double digits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Are we all looking at different NAM's or something? lol Maybe the resolution of output is greater on the Americanwx stuff than what I'm looking at? Ginx says 1001 to 975, Roosta 1009 to 981. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 and remember...he likes euro in big EC systems. interesting first call: He's not really sure where New England is, is he? He left out like half of New England land mass, lol. Maine seeing only 4-8" add in the fact that he has higher amounts in the CT Valley than the Berks and southern Greens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Whre is Ray, he would love the NAM clown map Even if it were right, knock the 1.5" down to about 1". I always doubt backlashes until I see the white of their flakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Se folks say rgem went from near hatteras @33 to a near stall near Virginia beach from 6 hrs or so ...maybe lil loop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Se folks say rgem went from near hatteras @33 to a near stall near Virginia beach from 6 hrs or so ...maybe lil loop That is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 That is terrible. It had a ridiculous outlier track last run there won't be loops that has to be completely discounted rofl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.