weathercoins Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 With this and other guidance, wouldn't the latest lwx snow map be a little low? I think it's on the low end for sure, but we've seen enough busts when rain gets mixed in for this area to stay on the cautious side. I think it's a good map. If the GFS and EURO move in a colder direction they will up it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Can someone post NAM wxbell map please? Need it !! pink.. as far as the eye can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinylfreak89 Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 only because it was asked for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I'm not comparing it to this storm other than there was a front end thump everyone was excited about (one which didn't happen). I'm not new here.. obviously don't need the responses that "wow what a dumb comparison." ? My post was nothing about you at all... Just was trying to remind people about the different conditions heading into last March. Really.. Please don't read beyond... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 There was not one scheduled for tonight. good plan, because.. you know /banter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM track looks sick to me...way better than 18z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Strange run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM about 1.1"? Roughly 0.9 of snow, per meteograms. http://meteocentre.com/models/get_mgram.php?stn=Washington&mod=gemreg&run=00&var=prcp〈=en&map=us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 ? My post was nothing about you at all... Just was trying to remind people about the different conditions heading into last March. Really.. Please don't read beyond... apologies.. i was responding to you and matt and others who jumped in saying it wasn't like mar 2013 immediately. my initial comment started "this is no mar 2013" but my overall point was more related to how we bust all the time and it's impossible not to be nervous. i'm starting to think today's trends might mostly be reversed anyway.. no 0z euro from last night perhaps but things look pretty good thus far (till the GFS drops 1" of rain). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 With this and other guidance, wouldn't the latest lwx snow map be a little low? 850 temps on the other hand could rise above freezing so you still might have sleet or freezing rain mess up accumulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM track looks sick to me...way better than 18z As Student noted above in his post, doesn't it look a bit weird? I guess it gets captured by the h5 low and becomes vertically stacked... but how it gets there with the reforming low seems odd to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jebman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I'm not either....we should get a front end thump, how long it lasts is more problematical. We should see a period of S plus or I'll be disappointed. I have 21 degrees 9 dews, should see some great snows, gonna stay up all night tomorrow night maybe on into the mid morning. Great times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM is just odd, elongates then stacks with precip hanging from SC/NC border to Nova Scotia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 With this and other guidance, wouldn't the latest lwx snow map be a little low? It is a probabalistic pivot point. They can adjust up or down and maintain continuity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM we flip to sleet and then rain after 12z and then back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Why is March 2013 being discussed. It's like 15 degrees right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Why is March 2013 being discussed. It's like 15 degrees right now time Marches on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM we flip to sleet and then rain after 12z and then back Didn't the RGEM lead the way out front of the other models at least one time several years ago? Everyone was shocked and the RGEM was correct in scaling accumulations way back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 0Z GFS looks slightly east at hr 33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huffwx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS has closed ull 2 frames in a row..hours 33 and 36 Way south, like in TN/GA and SC intersect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueapple Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Much drier. ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 RGEM we flip to sleet and then rain after 12z and then backThe main point is nice low track, was a decent bit east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twax1 Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 SHORT TERM /WEDNESDAY NIGHT THROUGH THURSDAY/...WINTER HEADLINE UPDATE...AFTER ANALYZING THE 18Z NAM AND GFS AND 21Z SREFS...WE HAVEUPGRADED THE WINTER STORM WATCH TO A WINTER STORM WARNING FOR MUCHOF THE CWA.ONE EXCEPTION IS CALVERT AND ST MARYS COUNTIES IN LOWER SOUTHERNMARYLAND WHERE WE THINK THAT MIXING WITH OR CHANGING OVER TOSLEET/RAIN WILL CUT DOWN ON SNOW ACCUMULATIONS AND THUS WILL BE INA WINTER WEATHER ADVISORY FOR 3 TO 5 INCHES. THE OTHER EXCEPTIONIS THE FAR NORTHWEST CWA WHERE IT WILL BE COLD ENOUGH FOR ALLSNOW HOWEVER THIS AREA MAY WIND UP BEING ON THE NORTHWEST FRINGEOF QPF AND THUS CONFIDENCE IN REACHING WARNING CRITERIA IS LOWERTHAN THOSE AREAS WE HAVE UPGRADED.THE WSW...DIGITAL AND TEXT PRODUCTS AND ALSO WINTER WEATHERGRAPHICS HAVE ALL BEEN UPDATED AND REFLECT THE HEADLINE CHANGESAND THE UPDATED STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL AMOUNT FORECAST.PREV...NORTHERN STREAM SHORT WAVE IS DIVING SOUTHEAST OVER MONTANA WHILESOUTHERN STREAM TROUGH IS PUSHING ACROSS THE SOUTHWESTERN US THISAFTERNOON PER LATEST WATER VAPOR LOOP. PHASING OF THESE PIECES OFENERGY REMAINS AN ISSUE AS IT AFFECTS THE TRACK OF THE SURFACE LOWAND PLACEMENT OF THE LOW LEVEL THERMAL GRADIENT...WITH THE ECMWFCONTINUING TO BE THE WETTEST/WARMEST/SLOWEST AND FARTHEST WEST. THENAM IS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE...BUT THE GFS HAS THE LOWEST QPF.PREFERENCE IS THE TRACK OF THE GFS...HOWEVER...SINCE THIS IS ASOUTHERN STREAM DOMINATE STORM WITH THE SURFACE LOW ORIGINATING OVERTHE GULF OF MEXICO...THE QPF LOOKS WELL ON THE LOW SIDE...AND HAVEINCREASED QPF TO MORE OF A BLEND OF ECMWF/GFS/WPC. SNOW RATIOS WILLSTART OUT BETWEEN 11:1 AND 12:1 NEAR THE I-95 CORRIDOR WITH UP TO15:1 TO THE WEST AS ANTECEDENT CONDITIONS WILL BE COLD. AS WARM NOSEPUSHES IN ACROSS THE EAST...SNOW RATIOS WILL LOWER...ESPECIALLY ASSLEET THEN RAIN MIXES GENERALLY ALONG AND EAST OF I-95. POTENTIALFOR HEAVY SNOW BANDING EXISTS ESPECIALLY IN SWATH ON NORTHERN SIDEOF 700MB FGEN FORCING WHERE NEGATIVE EPV INSTABILITY SITS JUST ATOPFORCING IN THE 700-600 MB LEVEL ON A CROSS-SECTION. AT THISTIME...THIS BANDING POTENTIAL LOOKS TO SET UP TO THE WEST OF I-95 ONA CORRIDOR FROM NEAR CHO TO IAD TO N/NE MD. MAXIMIZED OMEGA INDENDRITIC GROWTH LAYER WILL ALSO SUPPORT HIGH SNOWRATES...ESPECIALLY LATE WED NIGHT INTO THURS MORNING. SNOW TOTALSLOOKING IMPRESSIVE WITH OVER A FOOT POSSIBLE ACROSS THE BLUE RIDGEDUE TO INITIALLY UPSLOPE COMPONENT WITH THIS STORM SYSTEM. WILLLIKELY BE SOME TUNING OF THE SNOW AMOUNTS AS THE STORM NEARS...ANDWILL MAINTAIN WATCH FOR NOW WITH CONTINUED UNCERTAINTY. THE EDGESREMAIN MOST QUESTIONABLE DUE TO POTENTIAL RAIN/SLEET/SNOW LINEACROSS METRO AREAS AND SOUTHERN MARYLAND...AND ALSO WITH THELOCATION OF THE CUTOFF ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SNOW BANDS TOWARDWESTERN MARYLAND/EASTERN WV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS is blah for the front thump, but trying for the CCB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS has closed ull 2 frames in a row..hours 33 and 36 Way south, like in TN/GA and SC intersect and way warmer, wth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Closer to consensus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinylfreak89 Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 As Student noted above in his post, doesn't it look a bit weird? I guess it gets captured by the h5 low and becomes vertically stacked... but how it gets there with the reforming low seems odd to me my hunch is models are not resolving the capture properly yet. IIRC, they did something similar to this in Feb. 4-5, 2010 and everyone got worried. I would bet the lull is a lot shorter if existent at all and the CCB will overperform. Even without the CCB, its a solid 10" storm for most of the CWA. My worry about the lack of a CCB was due to the convective signature in the W Atl which now is gone on the 00Z suite. I think you will see the models trend toward a more defined CCB. These type of dynamics are very hard to model. I think when all is said and done, seeing 6-8" out of the CCB is not out of the question. However, the TSSN potential definitely exists on the front end... but thats fine with me, night time TSSN is much more fun anyway. I would not be surprised if models don't catch on to the CCB, which the alignment doesn't make sense given h5 and it ends up 50 mi north or so of where the RGEM/NAM puts what it has of it. These type of capture situations are very rare, and therefore, difficult to model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 GFS is terrible. It is dry and warm. H5 is almost euro like though so I am confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 It's cool how the GFS gives us a nice track with no precip. It'll probably be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.