Ian Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Cold high way off the Canadian coast, not where you want it for I-95 to stay all snow :/ we've tried to ignore that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 GFS precip is kinda weird on the western flank when the model is off OC The GFS is blowing up some sick W. Atlantic convection which works in-tandem with the dry-conveyor belt. This could be a reason it is limiting QPF in your area, but I am guessing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohleary Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Back end snow on the GFS is there. Doesn't appear to be a very long shot of rain. not much there after 18Z qpf-wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 same almost every winter...the models are flawed, including euro, to give DC snow and snow amounts that are totally inconsistent with climo and their OWN advertised longwave patterns...It is hard to snow in DC even in a good pattern..and Resolution will do nothing to stop it....LWX will have like their 100th bust in the last 4 years.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 look like 4" for me and then sleet and then rain next Matt, the run is bizarre, It's gotten wetter but I don't understand why the deformation zone doesn't have heavier precip or why when the low pulls east the 850 temps are slow to respond. A closed 500 with a low winding up offshore should be wetter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 we've tried to ignore that. yep...wash rinse repeat...the models show solutions that are adverse to their own advertised 500mb patterns and climo..we buy them...and Sterling busts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Cold high way off the Canadian coast, not where you want it for I-95 to stay all snow :/ Everyone is grasping at jan 23 1987. That had the same mo but somehow stayed snow. Can't think of any other big hits with a similar pattern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Matt, the run is bizarre, It's gotten wetter but I don't understand why the deformation zone doesn't have heavier precip or why when the low pulls east the 850 temps are slow to respond. A closed 500 with a low winding up offshore should be wetter. yes...both this run and the euro look goofy....I believe the GFS is closest to being correct...I'd be surprised if I see more than 2-3" from this storm before I mix... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swimmatte Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 DCA THU 06Z 13-FEB -2.9 -4.9 1021 96 100 0.16 555 539THU 12Z 13-FEB -1.3 -0.4 1011 97 99 0.42 551 542THU 18Z 13-FEB 0.9 0.3 1001 99 99 0.14 543 543FRI 00Z 14-FEB 0.9 -0.8 998 94 98 0.15 536 538FRI 06Z 14-FEB -0.8 0.0 1000 88 21 0.01 537 537 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 yep...wash rinse repeat...the models show solutions that are adverse to their own advertised 500mb patterns and climo..we buy them...and Sterling busts To be fair, LWX hasn't even put out a warning yet with snow total ranges.. I don't see how this can be ascribed to them as a bust no matter what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 To be fair, LWX hasn't even put out a warning yet with snow total ranges.. I don't see how this can be ascribed to them as a bust no matter what happens. true.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 true.. I mean, some of the eastern counties might never be under a Winter Storm Warning if they do wait until 0Z runs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 To be fair, LWX hasn't even put out a warning yet with snow total ranges.. I don't see how this can be ascribed to them as a bust no matter what happens. people are giving them a hard time for that but i think today's models show it's pretty wise.. perhaps could hoist out west tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Matt, the run is bizarre, It's gotten wetter but I don't understand why the deformation zone doesn't have heavier precip or why when the low pulls east the 850 temps are slow to respond. A closed 500 with a low winding up offshore should be wetter. It does look kind of unusual. Just looking at the low track and nothing else, one might think that's pretty good. But the thermals go to pot. It is certainly wetter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I mean, some of the eastern counties might never be under a Winter Storm Warning if they do wait until 0Z runs... right..but they will have to bite if 5" looks reasonable..models might not completely kill our storm until tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 The surface high extends westward into the mid-level confluence over the N. Mid Atlantic before cyclonic flow takes over with nor'easter. The high did its job and is being overused here as a reason. The problems are with the mid-level lows 850-700 track/wind etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 It does look kind of unusual. Just looking at the low track and nothing else, one might think that's pretty good. But the thermals go to pot. It is certainly wetter. the trough starts to go negative pretty early tho .. the pass is fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 people are giving them a hard time for that but i think today's models show it's pretty wise.. perhaps could hoist out west tho. yeah...caution is good.. and I am not blaming them entirely...it is our reliance on models in DC that lead us to bust so much...I hate to be right, but I am right...models almost NEVER trend to snowier solutions.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miller.b.time Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Updated Heavy Snow disco from WPC: PROBABILISTIC HEAVY SNOW AND ICING DISCUSSIONNWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD451 PM EST TUE FEB 11 2014VALID 00Z WED FEB 12 2014 - 00Z SAT FEB 15 2014...SOUTHERN PLAINS/LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TO SOUTHEAST AND ALONGTHE EAST COAST... A WINTER STORM WITH HIGH SOCIETAL IMPACT IS IMMINENT ACROSS THESOUTHERN TIER OF THE COUNTRY AND VERY LIKELY TO PROCEED UP THEEAST COAST ON WED AND THURS... ESSENTIALLY EXTENDING FROM THELOWER MS VALLEY TO NEW ENGLAND OVER THE THREE DAY PERIOD.A WELL-DEFINED SHORTWAVE TROUGH EMBEDDED WITHIN THE SOUTHERNSTREAM IS FORECAST TO MOVE OUT ACROSS TX/OK THISEVENING...REACHING THE LOWER MS VALLEY BY TOMORROW MORNING WHILESPURRING THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE EAST-NORTHEASTWARD TRACK OF ASURFACE LOW ALONG A STALLED FRONTAL BOUNDARY OVER THE NORTHERNGULF. INCREASING LOW LEVEL SOUTH-SOUTHWESTERLY FLOW WILL AFFORDSTRONG ISENTROPIC LIFT OVER A COLD ARCTIC SURFACE HIGH NOSING INTOTHE REGION...WITH ADDITIONAL LIFT AFFORDED BY THE RIGHT-ENTRANCEREGION OF THE UPPER JET. THIS WILL SET THE STAGE FOR ASIGNIFICANT AND POTENTIALLY PARALYZING ICE STORM FOR PORTIONS OFTHE SOUTHEASTERN U.S. WHILE AT LEAST SOME ICE ACCUMULATIONS CANBE EXPECTED ALONG A WIDE SWATH STRETCHING FROM NORTHEASTERN TX TOEASTERN NC THROUGH DAY 1...THE AREAS MOST LIKELY TO SEESIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATIONS OF A QUARTER-INCH OR MORE ARE CENTEREDACROSS NORTHERN LA/SOUTHERN EASTERN AR INTO W-CENTRAL MS...ANDMORE NOTABLY FROM E-CENTRAL AL TO SOUTHERN EASTERN NC...INCLUDINGNORTHERN-CENTRAL GA AND CENTRAL SC. ACROSS THIS LATTER REGIONTHERE IS A HIGH RISK FOR ICE ACCUMULATIONS OF AT LEAST AQUARTER-INCH...WITH POTENTIALLY MUCH HEAVIER AMOUNTS BY WEDEVENING. FURTHER TO THE NORTH...A SMALLER SWATH OF HEAVY SNOWS ISPOSSIBLE...WITH THE THREAT FOR ACCUMULATIONS OF 8-INCHES OR MORETHROUGH WED EVENING MAINLY CONFINED TO NORTHEASTERN GA...UPSTATESC AND SOUTHWESTERN NC.WHILE THE MODELS GENERALLY AGREED ON THIS SCENARIO UNFOLDINGACROSS THE SOUTH...THE FORECAST BECOMES MORE MURKY ON DAYS 2-3. CONCEPTUALLY THE MODELS ALL SHARE SIMILAR IDEAS...AS THEAFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERN STREAM WAVE PHASES WITH A NORTHERN STREAMTROUGH DROPPING SOUTHEASTWARD OUT OF THE NORTHERN HIGH PLAINS ANDINTO THE LOWER MS/TN VALLEYS BY TOMORROW EVENING...THIS WILL SPURTHE DEVELOPMENT OF A LOW ALONG THE SOUTHEAST COAST THAT ISFORECAST TO TRACK NORTHEASTWARD ALONG THE MID ATLANTIC COAST WEDNIGHT-THU AND THEN ALONG THE NORTHEAST COAST THU NIGHT-FRI MORNINGAS THE PHASED TROUGH ASSUMES A NEGATIVE TILT AND LIFTS ALONG THECOAST. WITH THIS SYSTEM THE POTENTIAL FOR WIDESPREAD DISRUPTIVESNOW/ICE ACCUMULATIONS ALONG THE MID ATLANTIC TO THE NORTHEASTREMAINS...HOWEVER DETAIL DIFFERENCES PERSIST IN THE MODELS THATLOWER CONFIDENCE IN THE PLACEMENT AND MAGNITUDE OF SNOW/ICEACCUMULATIONS. FURTHER COMPLICATING THE FORECAST ARE RUN-TO-RUNDIFFERENCES IN THE MODELS WHICH HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ONTHERMAL PROFILES AND AMOUNTS. THE NCEP MODELS REMAIN SLOWER THANTHE ECMWF/UKMET TO CLOSE OFF A LOW AT 500MB AND IN TURN ARE FASTERTO LIFT THE SYSTEM ALONG THE COAST AND IN TURN ARE LIGHTER WITHAMOUNTS AND/OR PAINT THEIR HEAVIER ACCUMULATIONS FURTHER TO THEEAST. THE UKMET/ECMWF ON THE OTHER HAND HAVE BOTH TRENDED ALITTLE SLOWER...WRAPPING MORE WARM AIR FURTHER INLAND THAN THEIRPREVIOUS RUNS...SHIFTING THE RAIN/SNOW LINE FURTHER TO THEWEST...RESULTING IN LIGHTER ACCUMULATIONS ALONG THE COASTAL PLAINSWITH A TIGHTER ACCUMULATION GRADIENT ALONG THE PIEDMONT BACK INTOTHE MOUNTAINS. WHILE THE MODELS CONTINUE TO WORK OUT THEIRDIFFERENCES...AN INTERMEDIATE SOLUTION...BUT ONE MORE CLOSELY TIEDTO THE UKMET/00Z ECMWF...WAS FOLLOWED THROUGH THE DAY 2-3PERIODS....WHICH IS REFLECTED IN THE HIGHER PROBABILITIES FORHEAVY SNOW CENTERED ALONG AND WEST OF THE I-95 CORRIDOR THROUGHTHE CENTRAL-NORTHERN MID ATLANTIC INTO THE NORTHEAST. MEANWHILESIGNIFICANT ICING WILL STILL BE POSSIBLE EARLY ON IN THE DAY 2PERIOD ACROSS PORTIONS OF CENTRAL SC TO SOUTHEASTERN VA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 yeah...caution is good.. and I am not blaming them entirely...it is our reliance on models in DC that lead us to bust so much...I hate to be right, but I am right...models almost NEVER trend to snowier solutions.... In this range especially. Too soon 2.11 0z Euro.. too soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twax1 Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 SHORT TERM /WEDNESDAY NIGHT THROUGH THURSDAY NIGHT/...NORTHERN STREAM SHORT WAVE IS DIVING SOUTHEAST OVER MONTANA WHILESOUTHERN STREAM TROUGH IS PUSHING ACROSS THE SOUTHWESTERN US THISAFTERNOON PER LATEST WATER VAPOR LOOP. PHASING OF THESE PIECES OFENERGY REMAINS AN ISSUE AS IT AFFECTS THE TRACK OF THE SURFACE LOWAND PLACEMENT OF THE LOW LEVEL THERMAL GRADIENT...WITH THE ECMWFCONTINUING TO BE THE WETTEST/WARMEST/SLOWEST AND FARTHEST WEST. THENAM IS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE...BUT THE GFS HAS THE LOWEST QPF.PREFERENCE IS THE TRACK OF THE GFS...HOWEVER...SINCE THIS IS ASOUTHERN STREAM DOMINATE STORM WITH THE SURFACE LOW ORIGINATING OVERTHE GULF OF MEXICO...THE QPF LOOKS WELL ON THE LOW SIDE...AND HAVEINCREASED QPF TO MORE OF A BLEND OF ECMWF/GFS/WPC. SNOW RATIOS WILLSTART OUT BETWEEN 11:1 AND 12:1 NEAR THE I-95 CORRIDOR WITH UP TO15:1 TO THE WEST AS ANTECEDENT CONDITIONS WILL BE COLD. AS WARM NOSEPUSHES IN ACROSS THE EAST...SNOW RATIOS WILL LOWER...ESPECIALLY ASSLEET THEN RAIN MIXES GENERALLY ALONG AND EAST OF I-95. POTENTIALFOR HEAVY SNOW BANDING EXISTS ESPECIALLY IN SWATH ON NORTHERN SIDEOF 700MB FGEN FORCING WHERE NEGATIVE EPV INSTABILITY SITS JUST ATOPFORCING IN THE 700-600 MB LEVEL ON A CROSS-SECTION. AT THISTIME...THIS BANDING POTENTIAL LOOKS TO SET UP TO THE WEST OF I-95 ONA CORRIDOR FROM NEAR CHO TO IAD TO N/NE MD. MAXIMIZED OMEGA INDENDRITIC GROWTH LAYER WILL ALSO SUPPORT HIGH SNOWRATES...ESPECIALLY LATE WED NIGHT INTO THURS MORNING. SNOW TOTALSLOOKING IMPRESSIVE WITH OVER A FOOT POSSIBLE ACROSS THE BLUE RIDGEDUE TO INITIALLY UPSLOPE COMPONENT WITH THIS STORM SYSTEM. WILLLIKELY BE SOME TUNING OF THE SNOW AMOUNTS AS THE STORM NEARS...ANDWILL MAINTAIN WATCH FOR NOW WITH CONTINUED UNCERTAINTY. THE EDGESREMAIN MOST QUESTIONABLE DUE TO POTENTIAL RAIN/SLEET/SNOW LINEACROSS METRO AREAS AND SOUTHERN MARYLAND...AND ALSO WITH THELOCATION OF THE CUTOFF ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SNOW BANDS TOWARDWESTERN MARYLAND/EASTERN WV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I'm happy with the macro-scale trends upstairs..supports the potential for decent banding and higher precip rates. We still get at least 0.5-0.6" QPF before the nose. I'm not going to fret over specific QPF output from the GFS at this stage. If the higher res models were were dry, I'd be more worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigjohndc Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Comparing the 18z NAM at 51hr and the 18z GFS at 54hr, aren't the location of the lows in basically the same position? Its seems to me the track between the two aren't that different. But, the solutions are . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCAlexandria Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Amost never isn't never. Can't discount the nam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 So let me make sure I have this right... earlier GFS runs were on the eastern end of the model envelope. Now its moved to the western side, and we are all saying its right? Come on now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 In this range especially. Too soon 2.11 0z Euro.. too soon. I really think once the metro area folk get the 12"+ amounts out of our heads, we're kind of around where we were yesterday morning in terms of expectations..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Amost never isn't never. Can't discount the nam Actually you can probably fully discount the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peribonca Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Things to take away: low is in great spot and we get good backside qpf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 yeah...caution is good.. and I am not blaming them entirely...it is our reliance on models in DC that lead us to bust so much...I hate to be right, but I am right...models almost NEVER trend to snowier solutions.... I see what you're saying, but don't totally agree. I don't think that reliance on models by forecasters (or us, or anyone else) causes more busts. I think they know what issues the models may have, what the biases are, etc., and take that into account. I cannot blame LWX or any other forecast outlet for issuing a watch and giving a heads-up at what could be a very disruptive event, when essentially every single major piece of guidance has been screaming for a high potential for warning-criteria snows. We may mix or change over but it still looks very likely will be that level of snowfall through Thursday morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 So let me make sure I have this right... earlier GFS runs were on the eastern end of the model envelope. Now its moved to the western side, and we are all saying its right? Come on now It's not on the western side. The track's not why it's so warm.. Edited: of the surface low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.