Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Southern Ontario winter '13-'14 Discussion part II


Ottawa Blizzard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Parts of the Mid ATL. and NE could end up seeing 40+cm by Sunday night if the models are correct. -_-

The downside to there respective locations is inconsistent snow cover but they have the best climo when it comes to Big Daddy storms. And I wouldn't mind that at all.

This winter for the GTA will go down as being sh!t in the snow department if we dont see atleast another 30cm by the end of March. This is frustrating!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parts of the Mid ATL. and NE could end up seeing 40+cm by Sunday night if the models are correct. -_-

The downside to there respective locations is inconsistent snow cover but they have the best climo when it comes to Big Daddy storms. And I wouldn't mind that at all.

This winter for the GTA will go down as being sh!t in the snow department if we dont see atleast another 30cm by the end of March. This is frustrating!

 

lol, if this winter is **** in terms of snow, what are 2011-12 and 2009-10? I will agree with the frustrating part, seeing what's going on to our SW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, if this winter is **** in terms of snow, what are 2011-12 and 2009-10? I will agree with the frustrating part, seeing what's going on to our SW.

Maybe I got out of hand with that post, my apologizes lol.

And in my personal opinion, I dont consider 2009-10 and 2011-12 as being "winters". More like an extended Fall or early Spring, lol. And you probably feel the same way. Two of the driest winters on record occuring within a 2-3 year period is unheard of in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The winter of 1995-96 was a decent one from the outside, but if you look deep, there could have been more. Most of the big storms affected the US East Coast that winter (eg. Blizzard of '96 on Jan 7) and there were more frequent and intense torch periods, mid-January and late February. On Jan 18th, it got up to 14C in Toronto. A lot of the snow that winter fell in November (31 cm) and April (20 cm). December had 27 cm, January 20 cm and February only 13 cm. March was good with 33 cm, though we got screwed by the March 20th storm (forecasts were calling for 20-25 cm the day before, but only 10 cm of wet snow fell).

This winter, so far, beats 1995-96 by a wide margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't breathe too hard

 

City of Toronto
12:20 PM EST Thursday 13 February 2014
Special air quality statement for
City of Toronto continued

High air quality health index values today.

Today is a day with high air quality health index (AQHI) values of 7 to 9 from Hamilton to the Greater Toronto area. This is due to elevated levels of nitrogen dioxide in the air as the result of light winds and a stagnant air mass. As the winds pick up today the air quality health index values will improve to moderate values but there is a risk that the values may go back up tonight near 7.

Issued jointly: Environment Canada and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we get the cold to return the last week of February and get some overnight lows in the minus teens, I think this February could end up as the coldest of the century thus far, possibly the coldest since 1979. The three to beat are February 2007 and 1993,tied with a mean of -8.4 Celsius, and 1994, with a mean of -8.3 Celsius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sent off an e-mail about the downtown station. Two weeks without an update. It's not just normal lag. Something's up.

I look at how quickly F6 data gets updated by the NWS and it's hard not to be envious.

I did the same a few days ago and Environment Canada told me the downtown TO observer will enter the Feb. data at a later date. Hopefully this will force EC to send the observer a gentle reminder to enter the data ASAP.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did the same a few days ago and Environment Canada told me the downtown TO observer will enter the Feb. data at a later date. Hopefully this will force EC to send the observer a gentle reminder to enter the data ASAP.

 

I got no problem with multiple emails. Hopefully they get the hint that people actually care about this stuff.

 

And what a disgraceful answer. They'll enter it at a later date. Maybe next week. Maybe in April. EC makes it difficult for me not to loathe them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got no problem with multiple emails. Hopefully they get the hint that people actually care about this stuff.

 

And what a disgraceful answer. They'll enter it at a later date. Maybe next week. Maybe in April. EC makes it difficult for me not to loathe them.

 

A few weather weenies on an American weather board probably won't push them over the edge haha. Now if some businesses or other levels of government (municipalities) started making some noise, I'm sure they would update the data ASAP.

 

What makes me despise EC (at times) is simply their lack of transparency. What makes me envious is going to weather.gov or any other NOAA sites and seeing how much info is publicly available and easy to access. Would love it if Environment Canada issued AFD's... would that be so much to ask? I'm sure they have to type their thoughts out somewhere anyway, why not post it to the web?

 

Even Special Weather Statements and Event Summaries are so canned and contain very little information in terms of a meteorological synopsis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few weather weenies on an American weather board probably won't push them over the edge haha. Now if some businesses or other levels of government (municipalities) started making some noise, I'm sure they would update the data ASAP.

 

What makes me despise EC (at times) is simply their lack of transparency. What makes me envious is going to weather.gov or any other NOAA sites and seeing how much info is publicly available and easy to access. Would love it if Environment Canada issued AFD's... would that be so much to ask? I'm sure they have to type their thoughts out somewhere anyway, why not post it to the web?

 

Even Special Weather Statements and Event Summaries are so canned and contain very little information in terms of a meteorological synopsis.

 

They used to have the daily weather synopsis, which they scrapped in September of 2001. It wasn't as technical as an NWS AFD but you at least got some insight into their forecasts.

 

EC does have a general model diagnostic discussion, which you can find here:

 

http://meteocentre.com/cgi-bin/get_prod?STN=CWAO&NUM=01&PROD=FXCN&HR=09

 

It's hit an miss. Sometimes there's substantive meteorological discussion. Other times it's just a summary of what the various models are progging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got no problem with multiple emails. Hopefully they get the hint that people actually care about this stuff.

And what a disgraceful answer. They'll enter it at a later date. Maybe next week. Maybe in April. EC makes it difficult for me not to loathe them.

It's tough since the downtown measurements this season have been spot on. Let's hope this continues once the observer finally gets the chance to enter the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They used to have the daily weather synopsis, which they scrapped in September of 2001. It wasn't as technical as an NWS AFD but you at least got some insight into their forecasts.

 

EC does have a general model diagnostic discussion, which you can find here:

 

http://meteocentre.com/cgi-bin/get_prod?STN=CWAO&NUM=01&PROD=FXCN&HR=09

 

It's hit an miss. Sometimes there's substantive meteorological discussion. Other times it's just a summary of what the various models are progging.

 

Good link, thanks! Didn't even know this existed or was accessible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...