Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

January 30-February 3rd Wave Train Part 2


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

12z NAM is farther south and a bit colder through 15z Saturday. 1000-850 critical thickness is south of I-80 and 850-700 critical thickness is along I-80.

Sent from my SCH-I535

 

It still ended up NW/warmer.

 

It just gets there with a somewhat sharper left turn a little later (flirting with dry slotting issues here now), which happens at an ideal time for Chicago's benefit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 979
  • Created
  • Last Reply

12z NAM is farther south and a bit colder through 15z Saturday. 1000-850 critical thickness is south of I-80 and 850-700 critical thickness is along I-80.

Sent from my SCH-I535

 

That makes me feel better after running through the bufkit profiles from 6z.

 

Even though LL temps got to around -1 at their warmest, snow totals were painted between 8 and 12".  Talk about heart attack snow.  :yikes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really.

It just show a somewhat sharper left turn a little later on (flirting with dry slotting issues here now), which happens at an ideal time for Chicago's benefit.

Yeah, I misspoke a bit on farther south track, it was more so a bit colder than the previous run during the heaviest rates over northern IL, which is important to quell mixing concerns in most of the Chicago area. A sounding along I-80 and I-55 near JOT toes the 0 line at 18z at 850 but easily would support all snow due to good vv's at that time and is colder than that at 15z.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes me feel better after running through the bufkit profiles from 6z.

Even though LL temps got to around -1 at their warmest, snow totals were painted between 8 and 12". Talk about heart attack snow. :yikes:

Even with the 6z NAM I wasn't all that concerned for north of I-80 areas. Hopefully the 12z GFS keeps the sleet/ice threat out of the metro too. Our southern counties are a different story though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with the 6z NAM I wasn't all that concerned for north of I-80 areas. Hopefully the 12z GFS keeps the sleet/ice threat out of the metro too. Our southern counties are a different story though.

 

I wasn't too concerned up here either, just anything cooler to help make the snow less wet and heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. It looks to be a bit weaker, but it still ultimately gets to the thumb region like on the 06z run. At best, it probably led to merely cosmetic improvements for those riding the border right now. 

 

To me, it looks more like Pt. Huron than the thumb on the 12z. But I won't split hairs. The bleeding's been stopped and for those of us on the line that's important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with the 6z NAM I wasn't all that concerned for north of I-80 areas. Hopefully the 12z GFS keeps the sleet/ice threat out of the metro too. Our southern counties are a different story though.

 

Have you taken a look at any of the Hi-Res guidance? Noticed they all have the 0*C 850 mb line approximately 50 miles further South than NAM/GFS/EURO. I wonder if this is a result of Hi-Res guidance producing more adiabatic cooling during the period of greatest lift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you taken a look at any of the Hi-Res guidance? Noticed they all have the 0*C 850 mb line approximately 50 miles further South than NAM/GFS/EURO. I wonder if this is a result of Hi-Res guidance producing more adiabatic cooling during the period of greatest lift.

 

They've been slowly trending towards the model consensus with time. 

 

The 06z NMM and ARW for example are closer to what the other guidance depicts now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...