dryslot Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 GFS following the other guidance with its shift NW but remains cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyewall Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 The RGEM seems quite reasonable for most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 FEB_5TH_2014.png How close will this homegrown weenie map be? Neat looking map, but I think the high totals are overdone. Just my weenie opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 6-10" here. Plymouth shouldn't get screwed too much in this set-up, so we could reach the 10". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 GFS is still frozen even at BOS, but it's close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Classic WSW-ENE gradient on the GFS after 15z tomorrow. Snowing at Phil's and pinging in HFD. That's a nice thump though...big omega. Good hang back moisture too, even possibly down to the pike region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Snowing at Phil's and pinging in HFD. That's a nice thump though...big omega. Good hang back moisture too, even possibly down to the pike region. Yeah pretty classic. I think I'll probably change to drizzle or something at like 33F at the tail end and then maybe another fresh coating or so early evening as the temp drops again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Can't look at 850mb... at least initially the warming that's troublesome is 725-775 mb. GFS definitely snowier than the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Can't look at 850mb... at least initially the warming that's troublesome is 725-775 mb. GFS definitely snowier than the NAM. That wasn't hard to do down by you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 It still pings you, but it is colder. Yeah i don't see any way i don't have an hour or 2 or 3 of sleet. No big deal. I like 8-10 for my area. Could see Union getting a bit more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 It still pings you, but it is colder. Watch the sneaky warm layer... I could see lots of early pinging. And no we're not "buying" the NAM. If we did that we'd forecast no snow up through N CT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Box saying there were convective feedback issues on nam that brought in too much warmth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 What I'd give to be in Rindge or even the Poconos for this one... Oh well, I'll have to suffer from my apartment in southern Brooklyn. Expecting a 1-3"/2-4" snowfall then ice, and eventually rain. Places just north of here in NYC proper probably stay below freezing throughout. Interesting that the initial SE track on models produced a colder outcome as Scott says, but the slight movement northward of the track combined with a poor antecedent airmass are now giving us the expected outcomes. Still think BOX is too widespread with the 10-14" given the mid-level warming showing up. Thinking 6-8" in southern Massachusetts ranging towards a foot near Ashburnham. SWFEs aren't for us, never have been, never will. We have the rare exceptions like 2/22/08, but the majority are the lousy ones like 12/13/07. Upton unfortunately bit on the colder solutions yesterday and painted 4-8" for the city and coast that will be half that if we're lucky. The freezing rain I am concerned about though-if models at the surface are just maybe 2 degs too warm now, we all will have a nasty period of ZR given we never switch to a warm wind direction and we have plenty of snowcover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Yeah pretty classic. I think I'll probably change to drizzle or something at like 33F at the tail end and then maybe another fresh coating or so early evening as the temp drops again. We may see prolonged weenie snow for hours tomorrow night in E MA/NH as there is sort of an inverted trough look with moisture trapped below 800mb...but 850mb cools to like -10C which would be good for dendritic growth. It wouldn't amount to a lot, but it could be the type of thing that gives a half inch or an inch of fluff on top of whatever happened earlier in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlantStickers Anonymous Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Box saying there were convective feedback issues on nam that brought in too much warmth. Pretty typical issue with the nam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 NWS Boston (@NWSBoston) tweeted at 10:50 AM on Tue, Feb 04, 2014: Tech: 12z nam appears to have convective feedback issues resulting in a stronger mid level low and likely too far N with warmer air. Ha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Pretty typical issue with the nam. That's what I thought just from lurking, figured I'd point it out for those riding that solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbutts Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 The nam is just pure garbage..yet many bought it.. Be interesting to see if Euro goes colder again Any reasoning for calling the NAM garbage? Looks nearly identical to the GFS to me: IMO it's your (lack of) analysis that's garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 We may see prolonged weenie snow for hours tomorrow night in E MA/NH as there is sort of an inverted trough look with moisture trapped below 800mb...but 850mb cools to like -10C which would be good for dendritic growth. It wouldn't amount to a lot, but it could be the type of thing that gives a half inch or an inch of fluff on top of whatever happened earlier in the day. Yeah there looks to be some NNE-NE flow aloft off the GOM so I'm hoping to grab an inch of possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 RGEM QPF that falls as snow....guidance seems to be honing in on that Rt 2 corridor up into S VT/S NH I'll take that. Looks like that orange is essentially 1"+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 NWS Boston (@NWSBoston) tweeted at 10:50 AM on Tue, Feb 04, 2014: Tech: 12z nam appears to have convective feedback issues resulting in a stronger mid level low and likely too far N with warmer air. Ha! Was this from the HPC? RGEM was similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Any reasoning for calling the NAM garbage? Looks nearly identical to the GFS to me: GFS_3_2014020412_F30_TMPC_500_MB.png NAM_221_2014020412_F30_TMPC_500_MB.png IMO it's your (lack of) analysis that's garbage. Did you look at 850's, 700? Night and day difference. GFS gives Ct 6-9 inches of snow..Nam=none Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Any reasoning for calling the NAM garbage? Looks nearly identical to the GFS to me: GFS_3_2014020412_F30_TMPC_500_MB.png NAM_221_2014020412_F30_TMPC_500_MB.png IMO it's your (lack of) analysis that's garbage. imo comparing 5H for sensible weather outcome is garbage. GFS is a much colder solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Was this from the HPC? RGEM was similar. RGEM was a little bit colder but not much...it did make the difference though for places like HFD over to PVD getting 6-7" vs 2". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Did you look at 850's, 700? Night and day difference. GFS gives Ct 6-9 inches of snow..Nam=none 6-9 is reasonable for you imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sankaty Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 GFS for MMK area: If I'm reading it correctly, the sounding shows the column comfortably below freezing through 24h (12z). By 27h (15z), part of the column has just edged above freezing. Estimating that we're snowing through about 14z. About .62" qpf has fallen by then, presumably as snow. About .28" falls afterward, presumably IP/FZ (we never get above freezing at the surface). I'm guessing that the changeover will happen a bit faster than the GFS shows, but that the snow will arrive a little faster, too. Also expect that the precip will end significantly sooner than progged (it always seems to in these storms), so the IP/FZ will not be as prolific as advertised. So, based on the GFS, with support from last night's EC, expecting 4-6 inches of snow followed by a couple of hours of sleet and freezing rain, which will add a glaze to the snow pack but not have much of an impact otherwise. I'm totally discounting the NAM. If it's right, though, we'd just have a coating of snow followed by lots of sleet and freezing rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 6-9 is reasonable for you imo. I'm going for a final call of 8-12" here IMBY. Maybe just to the NW of you over toward Dracut or Merrimack, NH pulls off a 13-14" amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 6-9 is reasonable for you imo. i'll be in the 8-10 inch range..Feel very confident in that. I'd like to be in Hunchback's yard for this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 We may see prolonged weenie snow for hours tomorrow night in E MA/NH as there is sort of an inverted trough look with moisture trapped below 800mb...but 850mb cools to like -10C which would be good for dendritic growth. It wouldn't amount to a lot, but it could be the type of thing that gives a half inch or an inch of fluff on top of whatever happened earlier in the day. I'm Kind of excited about that trough. Most models show it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 i'll be in the 8-10 inch range..Feel very confident in that. I'd like to be in Hunchback's yard for this one Yea. Jaffrey, New Ipswich, NH should clean up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.